본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Innovation in Digital Technologies and Priority of Foreign Policy: China’s Innovation in Digital Technologies and Chinese Leaders’ Foreign Travel

이용재
한국국방연구원 (Korea Institute for Defense Analyses)|2023.03|The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis|제35권 제1호|pp. 83-110|DOI 10.22883/kjda.2023.35.1.005

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Chinadigital technologythe United Statesforeign traveldiplomatic priority

초록

It is undisputed that technological innovation is a key driving force of national development. Recently, an intensified technological competition between the United States and China demonstrates that hegemons and contending powers have tried to sprint in the leading of technological innovation facilitating economic and military leadership. This work attempts to examine whether the competition between the United States and China in digital technology influence China’s diplomatic priority by analyzing top Chinese leaders’ foreign visits indicating national diplomatic priority. As China’s innovation in digital technology relatively grows, if Chinese leaders more often travel to rogue states, U.S. allies in the Asian–Pacific region, rising powers, and countries that are hostile to the United States, it can be seen as seeking to challenge the U.S.-led global order. Regression findings verify that with relative improvement of China’s ability in digital technology, top Chinese leaders less frequently visit rogue states, rising powers, and U.S. antagonistic states.

Abstract

It is undisputed that technological innovation is a key driving force of national development. Recently, an intensified technological competition between the United States and China demonstrates that hegemons and contending powers have tried to sprint in the leading of technological innovation facilitating economic and military leadership. This work attempts to examine whether the competition between the United States and China in digital technology influence China’s diplomatic priority by analyzing top Chinese leaders’ foreign visits indicating national diplomatic priority. As China’s innovation in digital technology relatively grows, if Chinese leaders more often travel to rogue states, U.S. allies in the Asian–Pacific region, rising powers, and countries that are hostile to the United States, it can be seen as seeking to challenge the U.S.-led global order. Regression findings verify that with relative improvement of China’s ability in digital technology, top Chinese leaders less frequently visit rogue states, rising powers, and U.S. antagonistic states.

참고문헌 (63)

  1. Min-hyung Kim, "A Real Driver of U.S.–China Trade Conflict: The Sino–U.S. Competition for Global Hegemony and Its Implications for the Future", International Trade, Politics and Development, 3(1), pp.34~ (2019)
  2. Scott Kastner, "Is China a Status Quo or Revisionist State? Leadership Travel as an Empirical Indicator of Foreign Policy Priorities", International Studies Quarterly, 56(1), pp.165~ (2012)
  3. Xiaoting Li, "Dealing with the Ambivalent Dragon: Can Engagement Moderate China’s Strategic Competition with America?", International Interactions, 41(3), pp.480~508 (2015)
  4. Julia Bader, "China, Autocratic Patron? An Empirical Investigation of China as a Factor in Autocratic Survival", International Studies Quarterly, 59(1), pp.23~33 (2016)
  5. Zeng Lian, "Presidential Marketing: Trade Promotion Effects of State Visits", Global Economic Review, 49(3), pp.309~327 (2020), 동서문제연구원
  6. Custer, "Ties That Bind: Quantifying China’s Public Diplomacy and Its “Good Neighbor” Effect" (2018), AidData at William & Mary
  7. Stone, "Chinese Power and the State–Owned Enterprise", International Organization, 76(1), pp.229~250 (2022)
  8. Faqin Lin, "The Impact of Africa–China’s Diplomatic Visits on Bilateral Trade", Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 64(3), pp.317~ (2017)
  9. Yu Wang, "China Visits: A Dataset of Chinese Leaders’ Foreign Visits", The Review of International Organizations, pp.1~25 (2022)
  10. Joseph Nye, "The Changing Nature of World Power", Political Science Quarterly, 105(2), pp.179~ (1990)
  11. Daniel Drezner, "State Structure, Technological Leadership and the Maintenance of Hegemony", Review of International Studies, 27(1), pp.6~ (2001)
  12. Robert Gilpin, "The Theory of Hegemonic War", The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), pp.591~613 (1988)
  13. George Modelski, "Exploring Long Cycles" (1987), Lynne Reiner
  14. George Modelski, "Seapower in Global Politics, 1494–1993" (1988), University of Washington Press
  15. George Modelski, "Leading Sectors and World Powers: The Coevolution of Global Politics and Economics" (1996), University of South Carolina Press
  16. William Thompson, "Long Waves, Technological Innovation, and Relative Decline", International Organization, 44(2), pp.201~233 (1990)
  17. S. V. Bryukhovetskaya, "Management of Digital Technology Development in the National Economy", IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 421(4), pp.1~ (2020)
  18. Mullabayev Bulturbayevich, "The Impact of the Digital Economy on Economic Growth", International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 1(1), pp.5~ (2020)
  19. Inna Irtyshcheva, "The Effect of Digital Technology Development on Economic Growth", International Journal of Data and Network Science, 5, pp.26~ (2021)
  20. The Impact of Digital Technology on Economic Growth and Productivity, and Its Implications for Employment and Equality: An Evidence Review, "Kevin Hernandez", 11~, pp.Evidence Report, no. 207 (2016)
  21. Yuen Khong, "Power as prestige in world politics", International Affairs, 95(1), pp.124~ (2019)
  22. Baohui Zhang, "American Hegemony and China’s U.S. Policy", Asian Perspective, 28(3), pp.87~114 (2004), 극동문제연구소
  23. Avery Goldstein, "Power Transitions, Institutions, and China’s Rise in East Asia : Theoretical Expectations and Evidence", Journal of Strategic Studies, 30(4–5), pp.648~ (2007)
  24. Barry Posen, "Command of the Commons : The Military Foundation of U. S. Hegemony", International Security, 28(1), pp.24~ (2003)
  25. The U.S. and China Technological and Political Competition and How Affect to Argentina and Latin America, "Juan Battaleme", Instituto de Ciencias Sociales y Disciplinas Proyectuales, 5~ (2019)
  26. Yuen Khong, "Power as Prestige in World Politics", International Affairs, 95(1), pp.124~ (2019)
  27. Abramo Organski, "World Politics" (1968), Knopf
  28. Noam Chomsky, "Rogue States : The Rule of Force in World Affairs", pp.1~ (2015), Haymarket Books
  29. Paul Hoyt, "The ‘Rogue State’ Image in American Foreign Policy", Global Society, 14(2), pp.297~ (2000)
  30. "The United Nations Security Council, Sanctions and Other Committees" (2021)[URL]
  31. "Meriam-Webster" (2023)[URL]
  32. Khalid Nadvi, ""Rising Powers"and Labour and Environmental Standards", Oxford Development Studies, 42(2), pp.140~ (2014)
  33. "U.S. Legal" (2023)[URL]
  34. "Sanctions Programs and Country Information" (2021)[URL]
  35. Riitta Katila, "Using Patent Data to Measure Innovation Performance", International Journal of Business Performance Management, 2(1–3), pp.7~ (2000)
  36. Jenő Kürtössy, "Innovation Indicators Derived from Patent Data", Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 12(1), pp.94~ (2004)
  37. "WIPO Statistics Database" (2021)[URL]
  38. "Patent Publication = Published Patent Application"[URL]
  39. "What Does Patent Grant Mean?" (2019)[URL]
  40. "World Development Indicators" (2021)[URL]
  41. Leaders’ Foreign Travel and Foreign Investment Inflows, "Oasis Kodila-Tedika", Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 3~ (2020)
  42. Volker Nitsch, "State Visits and International Trade", World Economy, 30(12), pp.1797~ (2007)
  43. Albert Hirschman, "National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade(Berkeley" (1945), University of California Press
  44. Robert Keohane, "Power and Interdependence" (1977), Pearson
  45. "The Direction of Trade Statistics (DOTS)" (2021)[URL]
  46. Clair Apodaca, "Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics" (2017)
  47. Carol Lancaster, "Redesigning Foreign Aid", Foreign Affairs, 79(5), pp.78~ (2000)
  48. James Meernik, "Testing Models of U. S. Foreign Policy : Foreign Aid during and after the Cold War", The Journal of Politics, 60(1), pp.69~72 (1998)
  49. Samantha Custer, "Tracking Chinese Development Finance : An Application of AidData’s TUFF 2. 0 Methodology" (2021), AidData at William & Mary
  50. Andrew Nathan, "China’s Challenge", Journal of Democracy, 26(1), pp.157~ (2015)
  51. "POLITY5: Dataset Users’ Manual" (2021)[URL]
  52. "Polity V: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2018" (2021)[URL]
  53. Norman Aitken, "The Effect of the EEC and EFTA on European Trade : A Temporal Crosssection Analysis", The American Economic Review, 63(5), pp.881~892 (1973)
  54. Katherine Barbieri, "Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict?", Journal of Peace Research, 33(1), pp.29~49 (1996)
  55. Stuart Bremer, "Dangerous Dyads : Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816–965", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36(2), pp.309~341 (1992)
  56. Gary Geortz, "Territorial Changes and International Conflict" (1992), Routledge
  57. Charles Gochman, "Interstate Metrics : Conceptualizing, Operationalizing, and Measuring the Geographic Proximity of States since the Congress of Vienna", International Interactions, 17(1), pp.93~112 (1991)
  58. Zeev Maoz, "Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–986", American Political Science Review, 87(3), pp.624~638 (1993)
  59. Scott Bennett, "EUGene : A Conceptual Manual", International Interactions, 26(2), pp.196~ (2000)
  60. Douglas Stinnett, "The Correlates of War (cow) Project Direct Contiguity Data, Version 3.0", Conflict Management and Peace Science, 19(2), pp.59~67 (2002)
  61. "ICEWS Automated Daily Event Data" (2021)[URL]
  62. "CAMEO Conflict and Mediation Event Observations Codebook" (2012)[URL]
  63. "ICEWS Events and Aggregations"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

The US-China Digital Innovation Competition and Power Transition: China’s Digital Innovation and Similarity in UN Voting이용재국제학연구소 · Journal of International and Area Studies2022 · 제29권 제1호The Political Economy of Technical Standards : China’s Standardization through the Digital Silk Road현지수인문사회과학연구소 · 인문사회과학연구2022 · 제65권 제3호Breaking Isolation and Distancing from a Buffer Zone: The U.S.-China High-Level Visits and China’s Policy Toward North Korea이용재통일학연구원 · Journal of Peace and Unification2022 · 제12권 제2호Shift in the Regional Balance of Power From Europe to Asia: A Case Study of ICT IndustryJin Hua, Liu Ximei, Muhammad Zahid Tunio, Shafaq Salam, Shen Tiyan, Zahid Latif, Zulfiqar Hussain Pathan한국정보처리학회 · JIPS(Journal of Information Processing Systems)2018 · 제14권 제3호The Fourth Industrial Revolution and China’s Defense Innovation in Intelligent Systems정용준, Shuting Dai한국국방연구원 · The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis2022 · 제34권 제2호Diplomatic Engagement and Economic Influence: The Interplay of Chinese OFDI and High-Level VisitsChoi Youngjun, Li Jiaen대외경제정책연구원 · East Asian Economic Review2024 · 제28권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

Designating North Korean Nuclear Weapons as Proliferation Risks: A Proposal for Forestalling Major Power Conflict in the Event of North Korea’s Internal CollapseJustin Andersonpp. 1-17Exploring Information Warfare Strategies during the Russia–Ukraine War on TwitterShao–Yi Lai, Shu–Min Hou, Wen-Cheng Fupp. 19-44Alliance Burden-Sharing in System Polarities김희연, 김성우pp. 45-64China’s Diplomatic Overture toward North Korea and North Vietnam in the Early Cold War Era유현주pp. 65-82China’s Defense Industry Development Policy—With Focus on the Implications Using the Dynamic ModelChiou-Guey Jan, Min Supp. 111-140
원문 보기