본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

형의 집행 및 수용자의 처우에 관한 연구

A Study on the Penal Execution and Correctional Treatment of Prisoner

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to present a device of revision about The Act of Penal Execution and Correctional Treatment. The nation must respect and safeguard the rights of her people. and prisoner is not an exception. But until these day, Inmates are consider as "Out law", so they are treated cancer of the public and subject of punishment. To day, the doctrine of correction has changed. The aim of imprisonment is not merely incarceration but improvement, education and re-socialization for offender. During the time that prisoner must spend, nation should protect and educate offender, and help him return to the public. Therefore, It is necessary that the condition in prison should maintain likely that in general society and rights of inmate should be guaranteed nearly that of general. although there is limitations which is created by imprisonment-nature. To achieve the above aim, in large number of countries have been manufacturing a system and establishing a law. In korea, The Act of The Penal Execution and Correctional Treatment has been put into force from 2007. There are many articles to protect prisoners rights and to improve correctional treatment in The Act. But, the prescription of The Act is abstract, discretion and idealistic. So, in spite of it's essence of representation, it is difficult to look expect the role of this Act. Now is the time to remodel the law, so I suggest that We shuld devise a system that arise practical effect, like as making a religious correction institution, building up institution for the elderly or woman and detail-revision of The Act, etc.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present a device of revision about The Act of Penal Execution and Correctional Treatment. The nation must respect and safeguard the rights of her people. and prisoner is not an exception. But until these day, Inmates are consider as "Out law", so they are treated cancer of the public and subject of punishment. To day, the doctrine of correction has changed. The aim of imprisonment is not merely incarceration but improvement, education and re-socialization for offender. During the time that prisoner must spend, nation should protect and educate offender, and help him return to the public. Therefore, It is necessary that the condition in prison should maintain likely that in general society and rights of inmate should be guaranteed nearly that of general. although there is limitations which is created by imprisonment-nature. To achieve the above aim, in large number of countries have been manufacturing a system and establishing a law. In korea, The Act of The Penal Execution and Correctional Treatment has been put into force from 2007. There are many articles to protect prisoners rights and to improve correctional treatment in The Act. But, the prescription of The Act is abstract, discretion and idealistic. So, in spite of it's essence of representation, it is difficult to look expect the role of this Act. Now is the time to remodel the law, so I suggest that We shuld devise a system that arise practical effect, like as making a religious correction institution, building up institution for the elderly or woman and detail-revision of The Act, etc.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 김남진, "행정법 Ⅰ" (2001), 법문사
  2. 김용우, "형사정책" (1998), 박영사
  3. 김일수, "한국형법 I" (1996), 박영사
  4. 박미숙, "국제인권기준과 현행 형사절차", 형사정책연구, 6(3), pp.22~25 (2000)
  5. 박상기, "형법총론" (2004), 박영사
  6. 박상열, "행형법개정의 의의 -형의 집행 및 수용자의 처우에 관한 법률", 矯正硏究, 47, pp.7~33 (2010), 한국교정학회
  7. 朴陽彬, "受刑者의 權利", 법조, 51(1), pp.42~79 (2002), 법조협회
  8. 박영규, "「형의 집행 및 수용자의 처우에 관한 법률」에서의 수형자의 권리", 矯正硏究, 45, pp.127~155 (2009), 한국교정학회
  9. 박영규, "『형의 집행 및 처우에 관한 법률』상 『질서유지』의 문제점과 개선방안", 矯正硏究, 50, pp.7~31 (2011), 한국교정학회
  10. 박재윤, "수형자의 권리와 권리구제제도" (1996), 국민대출판부
  11. 배종대, "형법총론" (2005), 홍문사
  12. 안동준, "형법총론" (1998), 학현사
  13. 양화식, "행형법 개정의 기본방향에 관한 연구", 교정연구, 2, pp.103~106 (1992)
  14. 윤영철, "형법이론으로서 적극적 일반예방이론에 관한 고찰", 비교형사법연구, 4(2), pp.4~106 (2002), 한국비교형사법학회
  15. 이재상, "형법총론" (2003), 박영사
  16. 李鍾吉, "朝鮮時代 囚人保護에 대한 一 檢討", 인권과 정의, 325, pp.1~ (2003), 대한변호사협회
  17. 이호중, "헌법재판소 판례로 본 행형과 수용자의 인권- 행형에 대한 헌법적 이해", 형사법연구, (22), pp.343~373 (2004), 한국형사법학회
  18. 임병락, "적극적 일반예방론의 虛와 實", 법학연구, (30), pp.211~234 (2008), 한국법학회
  19. 정갑섭, "최신교정학" (1997), 경기도서
  20. 서보학, "형법총론" (2006), 박영사
  21. 정승환, "서구 행형의 역사와 한국의 행형", 형사정책연구, 13(1), pp.7~208 (2002), 한국형사정책연구원
  22. 조성용, "적극적 일반예방의 가능성과 한계 : 독일의 논의상황을 중심으로", 법조, 52(10), pp.172~ (2003)
  23. 최준, "여성범죄와 여성수형자 처우", 법학연구, 18(1), pp.386~414 (2010), 법학연구소
  24. 한영수, "행형과 형사사법" (2000), 세창출판사
  25. 한정환, "예방목적의 통합이론(상)", 사법행정, 39(12), pp.9~11 (1998)
  26. 홍정선, "행정법특강" (2004), 박영사
  27. 朝創京一, "受刑者の法的地位, in 刑事政策" (1980), 法學書院
  28. Claus Roxin, "형법학 방법론" (1984), 박영사
  29. 허일태, "법철학입문 - Problemgschichte der Rechtsphilosophie" (1996), 세종출판사
  30. W.Hassemer, "Einführung in die Grundlagen des Strafrechts" (1991), Verlag C.H.Beck

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)