본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『駱駝祥子』에 나타난 祥子의 奴隸性 考察 - N. 베르쟈예프의 『노예냐 자유냐』의 관점을 중심으로 -

A Study of Xiángzi's Servility Revealed in “Rickshaw Boy” - Centering on the perspective of N. Berdyaev's 『Slavery and Freedom』

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

In his novel 『Rickshaw Boy』, Lǎoshe (老舍 (1899~1966): A Chinese novelist / play writer) describes a contradictory society encroaching upon a man. Lǎoshe places the cause of the main character Xiángzi's misfortune on individualism and the structural contraction of the society, which neglects the lives of people in the lower classes. However, he does not present specific breakthroughs for the cause. Is a human a slave or free being? It is never easy to answer this question since human being can be a slave or be free by himself or herself. If Xiángzi was in different circumstances, could he be free? What if he got a rickshaw that he always had wanted to have? Yet, the answers to these questions are already exhibited in the novel. The result is the same. Considering this, N. Berdyaev's『Slavery and Freedom』suggests a considerable number of points. And here is the reason why it can not be determined that Xiángzi's life, in Lǎoshe's novel『Rickshaw Boy』, was like that of a slave resulted from the contradictory society of those times or was a destruction caused by individualism. The main character of 『Rickshaw Boy』, Xiángzi, had many chances to choose and he did make a choice by his own free will whenever he faced one. Yet, the reason for the failure of the choices he made was the different servilities that existed inside him. Servility is presented in the properties that we each possess or the sexual seduction; it is also exhibited in individuality that is hiding inside human beings. Xiángzi, in the novel, seemed to make an attempt to free himself from all that subdued him, yet he could not do so ultimately. The freedom comes when one acknowledges his or her personality and tries not to lose his or her life from outer thing. This study intends to point out that Xiángzi was doomed to be a loser because of his servility within; he was already a slave to himself before being affected by the contradictory society. Such phenomenon could be due to the servility of Xiángzi but also to that of inside all human beings.

Abstract

In his novel 『Rickshaw Boy』, Lǎoshe (老舍 (1899~1966): A Chinese novelist / play writer) describes a contradictory society encroaching upon a man. Lǎoshe places the cause of the main character Xiángzi's misfortune on individualism and the structural contraction of the society, which neglects the lives of people in the lower classes. However, he does not present specific breakthroughs for the cause. Is a human a slave or free being? It is never easy to answer this question since human being can be a slave or be free by himself or herself. If Xiángzi was in different circumstances, could he be free? What if he got a rickshaw that he always had wanted to have? Yet, the answers to these questions are already exhibited in the novel. The result is the same. Considering this, N. Berdyaev's『Slavery and Freedom』suggests a considerable number of points. And here is the reason why it can not be determined that Xiángzi's life, in Lǎoshe's novel『Rickshaw Boy』, was like that of a slave resulted from the contradictory society of those times or was a destruction caused by individualism. The main character of 『Rickshaw Boy』, Xiángzi, had many chances to choose and he did make a choice by his own free will whenever he faced one. Yet, the reason for the failure of the choices he made was the different servilities that existed inside him. Servility is presented in the properties that we each possess or the sexual seduction; it is also exhibited in individuality that is hiding inside human beings. Xiángzi, in the novel, seemed to make an attempt to free himself from all that subdued him, yet he could not do so ultimately. The freedom comes when one acknowledges his or her personality and tries not to lose his or her life from outer thing. This study intends to point out that Xiángzi was doomed to be a loser because of his servility within; he was already a slave to himself before being affected by the contradictory society. Such phenomenon could be due to the servility of Xiángzi but also to that of inside all human beings.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 老舍, "駱駝祥子 in: 老舍全集 제3권" (1999), 人民文學出版社
  2. 錢理群, "中國現代文學三十年" (1998), 北京大學出版社
  3. 夏志淸, "中國現代小說史" (1979), 傳記文學社
  4. 老舍, "駱駝祥子 上 ,下" (1996), 통나무
  5. 老舍, "駱駝祥子" (1981), 금성출판사
  6. N. 베르쟈예프, "노예냐 자유냐" (1979), 도서출판 인간
  7. 김지영, "老舍『駱駝祥子』의 인물연구", 석사, pp.2008
  8. 유경아, "『駱駝祥子』인물군의 개인주의 연구", 석사, pp.2006
  9. 권미란, "老舍의 『駱駝祥子』연구", 석사, pp.2005
  10. 김현숙, "『탁류』와 『駱駝祥子』의 비교문학적 고찰", 석사, pp.2003
  11. 김의진, "老舍小說硏究", 석사, pp.1996
  12. 이경돈, "현진건의 『운수좋은 날』과 『駱駝祥子』비교연구", 석사, pp.1998
  13. 박준석, "『駱駝祥子』에 비친 비극성 및 인도주의", 석사, pp.1985
  14. 박기홍, "『駱駝祥子』, 의 수정에 관한 소고, 논문집" (1996), 경북외국어테크노대학
  15. 송현호, "『운수좋은 날』과 『駱駝祥子』비교연구", 비교문학 (2002), 한국비교문학회
  16. 노민영, "駱駝祥子소고", 梨花馨苑 (1993), 이화여자대학교, 인문과학대학

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)