『漢韓大辭典』에 보이는 『論語』 관련 어휘 연구
A Study of Related Words in the Analects of Confucius Presented in the Great Chinese-Korean Dictionary
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article investigates the problems with words in 『The Analects of Confucius (Lun Yu)』presented in the Great Chinese-Korean dictionary. The author classifies them into three: some errors of 1) meanings, 2) meaning interpretations, and 3) example sentences. First, the problems with the meanings are examined with the focus of words used in Lun Yu but not presented in the dictionary. The word, “yiru” is made up of “an adjective + ru” and if compared with the cases of “chanru”, “xiru”, “chunru”, “jiaoru”, “yiru”, it is clear that the word should be added. In addition, the word, “xianren” is included in the Chinese Great dictionary derived from 『lunyi』and this word should also be on the list. Second, the interpretation of “chifu” is insufficient. Namely, the following meanings can be supplemented: “physically holding and assisting” and “in the nation’s difficult times, persisting and helping.” Additionally, the meaning interpretations of “youshi” should be extended to “subjugating,” “invading,” “initiating a war,” and “performing ancestral ceremonies.” Third, the dictionary does not include the origin of some words in the example sentences for “zhiai”, “duqin”, “feishi”, and “shanzao.” The meaning “feishi” was especially narrowly presented if extended meanings such as “beigongfeishi”, and “eyieshi” are considered. Furthermore, as to “shanzao” the author argues it was derived from “shanjiezaozhuo” and examines carefully whether the example sentences about “zaozhuo”, “shanzao”, or “jiezhuo” as part of Lun Yu are mentioned in the dictionary. Finally, implications are discussed with suggestions for the appropriate error correction.
Abstract
This article investigates the problems with words in 『The Analects of Confucius (Lun Yu)』presented in the Great Chinese-Korean dictionary. The author classifies them into three: some errors of 1) meanings, 2) meaning interpretations, and 3) example sentences. First, the problems with the meanings are examined with the focus of words used in Lun Yu but not presented in the dictionary. The word, “yiru” is made up of “an adjective + ru” and if compared with the cases of “chanru”, “xiru”, “chunru”, “jiaoru”, “yiru”, it is clear that the word should be added. In addition, the word, “xianren” is included in the Chinese Great dictionary derived from 『lunyi』and this word should also be on the list. Second, the interpretation of “chifu” is insufficient. Namely, the following meanings can be supplemented: “physically holding and assisting” and “in the nation’s difficult times, persisting and helping.” Additionally, the meaning interpretations of “youshi” should be extended to “subjugating,” “invading,” “initiating a war,” and “performing ancestral ceremonies.” Third, the dictionary does not include the origin of some words in the example sentences for “zhiai”, “duqin”, “feishi”, and “shanzao.” The meaning “feishi” was especially narrowly presented if extended meanings such as “beigongfeishi”, and “eyieshi” are considered. Furthermore, as to “shanzao” the author argues it was derived from “shanjiezaozhuo” and examines carefully whether the example sentences about “zaozhuo”, “shanzao”, or “jiezhuo” as part of Lun Yu are mentioned in the dictionary. Finally, implications are discussed with suggestions for the appropriate error correction.
참고문헌 (13)
- 成百曉譯註, "論語集註" (1997), 傳統文化硏究會
- 李基東譯解, "論語講說" (1999), 성균관대학출판부
- "「漢韓大辭典」 刊行記-30년 大長征을 마치며" (2008), 檀國大學校東洋學硏究所
- 程樹德撰, "論語集釋" (1997), 中華書局
- 劉寶楠撰, "論語正義" (1992), 華書局
- 司馬遷撰, "史記會注考證" (1990), 天工書局印行
- 吳金華著, "古文獻整理與古漢語硏究" (2001), 江蘇古籍出版社
- 朱熹撰, "論語集注" (1996), 中華書局
- "漢韓大辭典" (2008), 檀國大學校東洋學硏究所
- "中韓辭典" (2002), 高麗大學校民族文化硏究院
- "漢語大詞典" (1995), 漢語大詞典出版社
- "中文大辭典", 中國文化大學出版部, 民國82年
- "大漢和辭典", 大修館書店, 昭和59年
