晚明小品文和正祖的文体反正
The Late Ming Dynasty' Essay and Literary Style Reformation of King Jongjo in the Chosun Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is correlation between The late Ming Dynasty' essay(小品文) and Literary style Reformation of King Jongjo in the Chosun Dynasty. It can be said that the thought and view of literature of Lizhi(李贄) and gonganpai (公安派) to reflect the distinctive times distinctive was opposite to existing literary theory. The late Ming Dynasty' essay was the most proper style of their writing. The late Ming Dynasty' essay has been introduced to Chosun Dynasty, many writer such as Park, Jiwon, and other noblemen were detracted by it. It was enough to threaten traditional prose. While King Jongjo against this current, he also tried to correct the wrong portion of the late Ming Dynasty' essay by changing the style of writing. This is because he considered himself as a representer of Chosun' Zhonghuazhuyi(中華主義) and , at the same time, he decided to establish Confucian orthodoxy and orthodox of literature by reviving orthodox literary ideology. Of course, It is deeply related to obtain the authenticity of Dynasty.
Abstract
This study is correlation between The late Ming Dynasty' essay(小品文) and Literary style Reformation of King Jongjo in the Chosun Dynasty. It can be said that the thought and view of literature of Lizhi(李贄) and gonganpai (公安派) to reflect the distinctive times distinctive was opposite to existing literary theory. The late Ming Dynasty' essay was the most proper style of their writing. The late Ming Dynasty' essay has been introduced to Chosun Dynasty, many writer such as Park, Jiwon, and other noblemen were detracted by it. It was enough to threaten traditional prose. While King Jongjo against this current, he also tried to correct the wrong portion of the late Ming Dynasty' essay by changing the style of writing. This is because he considered himself as a representer of Chosun' Zhonghuazhuyi(中華主義) and , at the same time, he decided to establish Confucian orthodoxy and orthodox of literature by reviving orthodox literary ideology. Of course, It is deeply related to obtain the authenticity of Dynasty.
참고문헌 (14)
- "弘斋全书"[URL]
- 李贽, "«焚书»，«续焚书»" (1998), 燕山出版社
- 张建业, "«焚书»，«续焚书»" (2011), 中华书局
- 钱伯城, "白苏斋类集" (2007), 古籍出版社
- 钱伯城, "袁宏道集笺校" (1981), 古籍出版社
- 钱伯城, "珂雪斋集" (1989), 古籍出版社
- 钱谦益, "列朝诗集小传" (2008), 古籍出版社
- 王守仁, "王阳明全集 3册" (2012), 古籍出版社
- 姜明官, "墙里墙外" (2007), 召命出版社
- 姜明官, "公安派与朝鲜后期汉文学" (2008), 召命出版社
- 安大会, "朝鲜后期小品文的实体" (2003), 太学社
- 안대회, "朝鮮 後期 小品文 創作과 明淸 小品文", 중국문학, 53, pp.185~200 (2007), 한국중국어문학회
- 袁震宇, "明代文学批评史" (1991), 古籍出版社
- 欧明俊, "论晚明人的小品观", 文学遗产, (5) (1999)