본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

An Evaluation Study on Universal Designs for Complex Cultural Facilities: Focused on the Facility Group at Amsa-dong Prehistoric Site in Seoul

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

(Background and Purposes) Everybody must be able to enjoy a fair cultural life and has a right to enjoy culture and improve the quality of life. Therefore, we need to think at least once if the cultural space is where everybody enjoys. In this study, we tried to check how the universal design has been reflected on the space for the complex cultural facilities and, on the contrary, if its evaluation method has been applied to the facilities. Hence, this study aims to propose a development direction of the universal design in the future as a space for everybody can use and enjoy comfortably through identification and analysis of the current state of its application on the facility group at Amsa-dong Prehistoric Site in Seoul.where the eligible complex cultural facilities were newly refurbished. (Method) This study has a great potential for development in the future and its scope is the facility group at Amsa-dong Prehistoric Site in Seoul that a wide range of users have a better chance of visit. A current state analysis on the above-mentioned scope of the study through theoretical considerations and an analysis framework extraction of the integrated guidelines and checklist of the universal design in Seoul present a basic analysis framework for its applicability as a core of this study. A field investigation and its analysis are carried out in order to figure out how much the checklist can be applied to the facilities in the end. In addition, we intend to figure out if the space has been applied as a design which embraces the people’s diversity and what is lacking and then present as basic data for the evaluation of the design which can be applied to the complex cultural space in the future. (Results) The field investigation results of this study look as if a universal design and barrier-free living environment have been applied, but visual or hearing information and a multinational guidance system are still lacking relatively. Meanwhile, the checklist for evaluation also appeared necessary to be complemented through some problems from its investigation process. Hence, this study attempts to propose a checklist which can be applied to the complex cultural facilities after some problems found in the investigation process have been complemented. (Conclusions) This study has a significance in its empirical evaluation by utilizing the existing materials of the universal design and applying them to Amsa-dong Prehistoric Site in Seoul, but failing to overcome such limitation remains as a regret. We hope that diverse studies with their domains deepened will be conducted in the future because the domestic cases of the universal design evaluation lack of diversity.

Abstract

(Background and Purposes) Everybody must be able to enjoy a fair cultural life and has a right to enjoy culture and improve the quality of life. Therefore, we need to think at least once if the cultural space is where everybody enjoys. In this study, we tried to check how the universal design has been reflected on the space for the complex cultural facilities and, on the contrary, if its evaluation method has been applied to the facilities. Hence, this study aims to propose a development direction of the universal design in the future as a space for everybody can use and enjoy comfortably through identification and analysis of the current state of its application on the facility group at Amsa-dong Prehistoric Site in Seoul.where the eligible complex cultural facilities were newly refurbished. (Method) This study has a great potential for development in the future and its scope is the facility group at Amsa-dong Prehistoric Site in Seoul that a wide range of users have a better chance of visit. A current state analysis on the above-mentioned scope of the study through theoretical considerations and an analysis framework extraction of the integrated guidelines and checklist of the universal design in Seoul present a basic analysis framework for its applicability as a core of this study. A field investigation and its analysis are carried out in order to figure out how much the checklist can be applied to the facilities in the end. In addition, we intend to figure out if the space has been applied as a design which embraces the people’s diversity and what is lacking and then present as basic data for the evaluation of the design which can be applied to the complex cultural space in the future. (Results) The field investigation results of this study look as if a universal design and barrier-free living environment have been applied, but visual or hearing information and a multinational guidance system are still lacking relatively. Meanwhile, the checklist for evaluation also appeared necessary to be complemented through some problems from its investigation process. Hence, this study attempts to propose a checklist which can be applied to the complex cultural facilities after some problems found in the investigation process have been complemented. (Conclusions) This study has a significance in its empirical evaluation by utilizing the existing materials of the universal design and applying them to Amsa-dong Prehistoric Site in Seoul, but failing to overcome such limitation remains as a regret. We hope that diverse studies with their domains deepened will be conducted in the future because the domestic cases of the universal design evaluation lack of diversity.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Gyeonggi-Do, "Gyeonggi-Do Universal Design Guideline", 20~24 (2011)
  2. Ha, Seung Ah, "A Study on the Expansion and Application of Universal Design in Public Cultural Facilities: focused on 'Seoul Arts Center' and 'National Museum of Korea'", Master, pp.2014
  3. 황동호, "국내 유니버설디자인 정책현황 연구", 한국공간디자인학회 논문집, 14(4), pp.43~52 (2019), 한국공간디자인학회[DOI]
  4. Ji, Hwan Soo, "Study on the planning of exhibition space of prehistoric site of Seoul Amsa-dong", Institute of Industrial Design Kyonggi University, 13(0), pp.94~105 (2016)
  5. 김정근, "지자체 공공디자인 가이드라인 분석", 디자인학연구, 23(5), pp.149~158 (2010), 한국디자인학회
  6. 김소은, "복합문화시설 외부공간 설계요소의 공공성분석- 국립아시아문화전당을 중심으로", 도시설계, 19(2), pp.5~20 (2018), 한국도시설계학회[DOI]
  7. 곽봉철, "유니버설디자인 확산을 위한 가이드라인 개선방안", 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지, 9(4), pp.61~71 (2015), 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회
  8. Lee, Yang Sook, "A Study on the Development of an evaluation system of the public design polices basted on civic engagement -Focused on the Assessment of design capabilities", pp.2014
  9. 임종훈, "이용자 만족도 분석을 위한 공공디자인 평가항목에 관한 연구", 한국공간디자인학회 논문집, 11(1), pp.101~111 (2016), 한국공간디자인학회[DOI]
  10. Lim, Sang Taek, "Amsa-dong Prehistoric Settlement site" (2010), Gangdong-gu Office Prehistoric Culture Office, Book Publishing SM
  11. Ministry of Health and Welfare & Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "BF_Certification System_Implementation Guidelines", ~ (2014)
  12. 박연선, "공공디자인 정책제안을 위한 기초연구", 커뮤니케이션디자인학연구, 48, pp.99~110 (2014), (사)한국커뮤니케이션디자인협회 커뮤니케이션디자인학회
  13. Seoul Metropolitan Government, "Seoul Universal Design Integration Guideline", ~ (2017)
  14. Seoul Metropolitan Government, "Seoul Universal Design Integration Guideline Checklist", ~ (2017)
  15. 왕사우, "유니버설디자인 개념에 의한 선유도공원 평가 연구", 인간식물환경학회지, 19(3), pp.229~239 (2016), 인간식물환경학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)