문학관 정보 디자인 개선을 위한 탐색적 연구 -사회 네트워크 분석을 중심으로-

Abstract

(Background and Purpose) Domestic literature museums are places of local branding, where narrative elements of literature are built into the space. They are intended to support the social and cultural activities of locals and tourists. The total number of literature museums, including public and private literature museums, is 126, and this number is expected to increase in each local government. This study found that there was no system to integrate information about authors exhibited in literature museums, then conducted a social network analysis of the relationship between literature museums and author exhibition information to systematize it. This study aims to derive directions for improving the information design of literature museums. (Method) The research method collected information on 126 literature museums and exhibited authors from the text recorded in web hyperlinks, then refined it into relationship data of literature museums and exhibited authors. The refined data includes the type of establishment, purpose, and region of the literature museum according to the opening period, the name of the exhibited author, and the author's gender. From this, degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and the closeness centrality between the literature museum and the exhibited author information were examined. Also, it conducted by an unweighted, undirected analysis method. (Results) The literature museums with the highest degree centrality appeared in the order of the Korea Modern Literature Museum, the Daegu Literature Museum, and the Kim Yoojeong Literary Village. However, in the betweenness centrality analysis, the reversed order was the Korean Modern Literature Museum, Kim Yoo-jung Literature Village, and Daegu Literature Museum. On the other hand, the closeness centrality of Park Kyung-ri Literature Park, Park Kyung-ri Literature Museum, Land Cultural Centre, and Pyeongsari Literature Museum was low at 0.152. The order of high centrality of displayed author information was Lee Yuk-sa, Park Kyung-ri, and Kim Dong-ri. Among them, Kim Dong-ri had the highest betweenness centrality of 2790.879, indicating that his exhibition information was mediated by other literature museums. In summary, it can be seen that public literature museums outnumbered private literature museums in Korea, and literature museums were concentrated in different regions until the early 2010s. In addition, Gyeongsangbuk-do had the most literature museums, and author information was concentrated on male writers who were active as poets in literary history from the 1920s to the 1950s. (Conclusions) The direction of improving the information design to build an integrated platform linking the information of authors in domestic literature museums should start with narrowing the gap in exhibition information between public and private literature museums. To this end, the information of literature museums should be unified into a unified platform information form and built with a single URL.