경찰수사에서 범인식별에 관한 목격자진술의 신빙성 제고 방안
The Method for Enhancing the Reliability of Eyewitness Testimony for the Identification in Police lnvestigation
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Eyewitness Testimony for the Identification can be a powerful piece of evidence in a criminal prosecuation. Many people who were at one time sentenced to death have been exonerated through DNA testing, which means ‘false testimony' could cause to false and deadly conviction. I can be referred to as the “eyewitness error" what is these, hasty decision for criminal identification of witness cause of the wrong decision. The danger of error in Eyewitness Testimony for the Identification must be examined and any flawed factors in Identification must be corrected. 71) The Supreme Court has denied reliabilty for an eyewitness and has establisched criteria for judging reliabilty by setting forth procedure for Eyewitness Testimony for the Identification due to the invalidity of procedure for criminal through photos and individual interviews that may cause unfair affect of suggestion based on sentenced 2003 D 7033 decided on Feburary 27th. 2004. Suggestions on the Implications of Eyewitness Testimony trustworthiness based on the theoretical backgrounds and case studies were discussed. In this paper, which has examined the legality of the proceeding of the criminal identified by the police investigation, and is obtained by presention a proposal to enhancing the authenticity of the Eyewitness Testimony in particular. In the future, I hope that the error judgement should be reduced by asserting in detail the results of Eyewitness Testimony for the Identification by an accurate witness, and more prudent investigation guideline must be established.
Abstract
Eyewitness Testimony for the Identification can be a powerful piece of evidence in a criminal prosecuation. Many people who were at one time sentenced to death have been exonerated through DNA testing, which means ‘false testimony' could cause to false and deadly conviction. I can be referred to as the “eyewitness error" what is these, hasty decision for criminal identification of witness cause of the wrong decision. The danger of error in Eyewitness Testimony for the Identification must be examined and any flawed factors in Identification must be corrected. 71) The Supreme Court has denied reliabilty for an eyewitness and has establisched criteria for judging reliabilty by setting forth procedure for Eyewitness Testimony for the Identification due to the invalidity of procedure for criminal through photos and individual interviews that may cause unfair affect of suggestion based on sentenced 2003 D 7033 decided on Feburary 27th. 2004. Suggestions on the Implications of Eyewitness Testimony trustworthiness based on the theoretical backgrounds and case studies were discussed. In this paper, which has examined the legality of the proceeding of the criminal identified by the police investigation, and is obtained by presention a proposal to enhancing the authenticity of the Eyewitness Testimony in particular. In the future, I hope that the error judgement should be reduced by asserting in detail the results of Eyewitness Testimony for the Identification by an accurate witness, and more prudent investigation guideline must be established.
참고문헌 (27)
- 목격자 증언의 정확성 제고방안, "김지영", 형사정책연구원, ~, pp.연구총서 06-23 (2006)
- 배종대, "신형사소송법(제5판)" (2013), 홍문사
- 신동운, "신형사소송법 제2판" (2009), 법문사
- 신양균, "신판 형사소송법" (2009), 화산미디어
- 법과학을 적용한 형사사법의 선진화 방안(Ⅳ), "윤지영", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2014)
- 이은모, "형사소송법" (2010), 박영사
- 차용석, "형사소송법" (2008), 21세기사
- 권창국, "목격 진술의 신뢰성 판단기준에 관한 고찰", 사회과학연구, 11(1) (2004), 동국대학교
- 김종길, "경찰수사에 있어서 범죄용의자 식별의 정확도 향상방안에 관한 연구", 박사, 경찰행정학, pp.2010
- 김지영, "복수면접(lineup)에서 순차적 제시와 동시적 제시방법의 식별 정확성 비교 분석", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 21(2), pp.59~70 (2007), 한국사회및성격심리학회
- 민영성, "目擊者에 의한 犯人識別陳述의 適正한 信用性評價를 위한 擔保方案", 저스티스, (79), pp.78~101 (2004), 한국법학원
- 민영성, "범인식별 방법 및 식별 진술 평가 시 유의사항", 부산대학교 법학연구, 46(1) (2005), 부산대학교
- 민영성, "범인식별진술의 위험성과 그 대처방안", 법학연구, 42(1)통권 : 50 (2001), 부산대학교
- 박종선, "목격자진술에 의한 범인식별의 신용성 평가", 중앙법학, 9(3), pp.243~266 (2007), 중앙법학회
- 백승민, "형사절차에 있어서 범인식별에 관한 연구", 저스티스, (102), pp.135~151 (2008), 한국법학원
- 송강호, "피의자 신문시 변호인참여제도의 활성화방안", 한림법학, 20 (2009)
- 류여해, "범인식별절차의 한계성 -대법원 2009.06.11 선고 2008도12111 강제추행치상 판결-", 경찰학논총, 4(1), pp.181~202 (2009), 경찰학연구소
- 이성기, "목격자의 범인식별진술의 증명력을 높이기 위한 실질적 대안으로서의 비디오 라인업", 경찰학연구, 10(2), pp.117~142 (2010), 경찰대학
- 이훈재, "경찰수사에서 범인식별시스템의 효율적 운영방안에 관한 연구", 한국경찰연구, 9(3), pp.123~148 (2010), 한국경찰연구학회
- 조광훈, "수사기관의 범인식별진술 및 절차의 문제점과 개선방안", 법학연구, 18(1), pp.193~244 (2008), 법학연구원
- 최교일, "영국에서의 목격자에 의한 범인식별 절차", 저스티스, 28(2) (1995), 한국법학원
- Brandon. L. Garrett, "Conviction the innocent : Where criminal prosecution go wrong" (2011), Harvard University Press
- C.Ronald Huff, "Convicted But Innocent: Wrongful Conviction and Public Policy" (1996), Sage Publications
- Gary L. Wells, "Eyewitness identification procedures : recommendations for lineups and photospreads", Law and human behavior, 22(6) (1998)
- Michael Zander, "The Police & Criminal Evidence Act 1984~revised second edition" (1990), Sweet & Maxwell
- Roy S. Malpass, "Eyewitness identification : lineup instructions and the absence of the offender", Journal of applied psychology, 66(4) (1981)
- Wells.G.L, "The psychology of line-up,identification", Journal of Applied psychology, 14 (1995)