본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

금산분리 법제의 역사적 및 철학적 기초에 대한 검토

Separation of Banking and Commerce: its History and Philosophy

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류사회과학일반

초록

이글의 목적은 금산분리 법제의 역사적 및 철학적 기초에 대하여 살펴보고 그 정책적 함의를 논의하는 것이다. 이를 위해 해외와 국내에서의 금산분리 등장의 역사, 금산분리의 법제적 특성 등과 관련한 기본적인 사항을 검토한다. 금산분리는 중세기 베니스에서 은행의 탄생과 함께 시작하였다. 금산분리는 소유와 지배를 매개로 산업에 의한 금융지배를 억제하는 것이며, 그 정책목적은 역사적으로 볼 때 은행의 건전성, 금융자원의 공정한 배분에서 시작되었다. 이후 금융위기를 거치면서 정책목적은 금융시스템의 안정성, 금융소비자보호 등으로 확대되기에 이르렀다. 금산분리의 적용범위는 은행 뿐 아니라 전 금융부문을 대상으로 하며 이는 금융겸업 및 겸영의 확대, 금융의 공적 안정망 확대 등에 따른 필연적 귀결이다. 금산분리의 역사적 기초는 중세기 베니스와 영란은행의 경험을 거치면서 확립되었으며, 그 합리성의 기초는 희소한 금융자원의 공정하고 효율적인 배분에 의한 기업 경쟁력 제고와 금융소비자에 대한 신인의무로부터 찾을 수 있다.

Abstract

This paper inquires into the historical and Philosophical Underpinnings of the separation of banking and commerce, and discusses the meaning and scope of the separation. The separation principle began in Venice where bank was born, which means that the separation principle is one of the oldest principles that has lasted the most in banking regulation. In the early history of banks in the U.K. and U.S., the separation was adopted as a foundational principle. In Korea also, the separation has stood long since it was adopted in the Interim Measure Act for Financial Institutions of 1961 and Banking Act of 1982. Why the separation of banking and commerce? First, it concerns the bank soundness, systemic safety and depositor protection. Second, the regulatory scope in which the separation rule applies has been expanded from ‘banking in nature’ to ‘financial in nature’under the GLB Act in the U.S. Fourth, financial safety net such as deposit insurance includes securities firms, insurance, saving institution as well as banks. According to Mark Roe(1994), the separation principle has contributed to the competitiveness of firms and development of nation economy.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. 고동원, "금융규제법 개론" (2019), 박영사
  2. 금융개혁 종합보고서, "금융개혁위원회", ~ (1999)
  3. 김용재, "은행법원론" (2019), 박영사
  4. 김자봉, "금산분리의 경제 이론", BFL, (98) (2019)
  5. 김자봉, "ILC는 은산분리규제의 예외인가? -은산분리원칙에 대한 미국 감독당국의 정책수단과 “ILC 예외제도”의 시사점", 은행법연구, 11(2), pp.203~237 (2018), 은행법학회[DOI]
  6. 김자봉, "인터넷전문은행은 은산분리규제의 예외인가? -소유와 지배의 분리원칙에 대한 논의를 중심으로-", 금융법연구, 15(3), pp.175~208 (2018), 한국금융법학회[DOI]
  7. 김자봉, "금산분리의 법리 - 법적 권리 간 이해상충의 경제적 인센티브와 충돌의 사회적 비용을 중심으로", 은행법연구, 13(2), pp.91~117 (2020), 은행법학회[DOI]
  8. 김자봉, "은산분리의 실증분석: 은행과 산업의 결합에 따른 비용-편익의 추정을 중심으로", 금융연구, 35(1), pp.113~145 (2021), 한국금융학회[DOI]
  9. 은행의 소유 지배구조에 관한 연구, "박경서", 한국금융연구원, ~ (1997)
  10. 이규성, "한국의 외환위기: 발생, 극복, 그 이후" (2006), 박영사
  11. 금융자율화의 효율적 추진방향, "이우관", 한국경제연구원, ~ (1988)
  12. 이동걸, "금융기관을 이용한 경제력 집중: 문제점 및 개선방안", 금융브리프, 14(11) (2005), 한국금융연구원
  13. 전성인, "금융과 산업의 분리 : 이론과 정책과제" (2008), 금융학회
  14. Arthur E. Wilmarth, Jr., "Wal-Mart and the Separation of Banking and Commerce", Conn. L. Rev, 39(1539), pp.2007~ (2007)
  15. Bair, Sheila C., "The fourth wave – the mixing of banking and commerce", Proceedings 1063, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (2007)
  16. Bair, Sheila C, "The future of banking in America", FDIC Banking Review, 16(4) (2004)
  17. Barr, Michael S, "Financial Regulation: Law and Policy", pp.184~ (2016), Foundation Press
  18. Berger, Allen N, "The Roles of Corporate Governance in Bank Failures during the Recent Financial Crisis", Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 48(4) (2016)
  19. The Separation of Banking and Commerce in the United States, "Bernard Shull", FDIC, ~, pp.FDIC Working Paper 1999-1 (1999)
  20. Campbell, John Y, "In Search of Distressed Risk", Journal of Finance, LXIII(6) (2008)
  21. Cantwell F. Muckenfuss III, "The separation of banking and commerce revisited, in The Mixing of Banking and Commerce", Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, ~ (2007)
  22. Comizio, V. Gerard, "After the Dodd-Frank Indusrial Loan Company Moratorium: What's Next", North Carolina Banking Institute, 17 (2013)
  23. "Dodd Frank Act Section 603. MORATORIUM AND STUDY ON TREATMENT OF CREDIT CARD BANKS, INDUSTRIAL LOAN COMPANIES, AND CERTAIN OTHER COMPANIES UNDER THE BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1956", ~ (2010)
  24. Erkki K. Laitine, "Bankruptcy prediction: Application of the Taylor’s expansion in logistic regression", International Review of Financial Analysis, 9 (2000)
  25. "Directive 2006/48/EC of the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions"[URL]
  26. "The Future of Banking: The Structure and Role of Commercial Affiliations" (2003)[URL]
  27. "Supervisory Insights - The FDIC's Supervision of Industrial Loan Companies: A Historical Perspective" (2004)[URL]
  28. "The Division of Supervision and Consumer Protection’s Approach for Supervising Limited-Charter Depository Institutions" (2004)[URL]
  29. "Characteristics and Regulation of Exempt Institutions and the Implications of Removing the Exemptions" (2012)[URL]
  30. "Recent Asset Growth and Commercial Interest Highlight Differences in Regulatory Authority" (2005)[URL]
  31. "H.R. 4173 (111th): Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act" (2010)[URL]
  32. Joshua Cutler, "Wal-Mart and Banking", Harvard Law School Case Study, ~ (2017)
  33. Kolari, James, "Predicting large US Commercial Bank Failures", Journal of Economics and Business, 54 (2002)
  34. Krainer, John, "The Separation of Banking and Commerce", FRBSF Economic Review, 16 (2000)
  35. Macey, Jonathan R., "Banking Law and Regulation" (2001), Aspen Law & Business
  36. Martin, Daniel, "Early Warning of Bank Failures", Journal of Banking and Finance, 1 (1977)
  37. Muckenfuss III, "The Separation of Banking and Commerce Revisited, in The Mixing of Banking and Commerce", Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, ~ (2007)
  38. Neel, Michelle Clark, "Industrial loan companies come out of the shadows", Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, ~ (2007)
  39. Omarova, Saule T., "The Merchants of Wall Street: Banking, Commerce and Commodities", Minnesota Law Review, 98, pp.265~ (2013)
  40. Mark Olson, "Are banks still special?, remarks at the Annual Washington Conference of the Institute of International Bankers", BIS Review, 20 (2006), BIS Review
  41. Park, Sangkyunk, "Effects of the affiliation of banking and commerce on the firm’s investment and the bank’s risk", Journal of Banking and Finance, 24 (2000)
  42. Roe, Mark J., "Strong Managers Weak Owners:The Political Roots of American Finance", pp.1994
  43. Seidman, L. William, "Comments at the FDIC Symposium, The Future of Banking: The Structure and Role of Commercial Affiliations", ~ (2003)
  44. The Separation of Banking and Commerce in the United States: an Examination of Principal Issues, "Shull, Bernard", OCC, ~, pp.OCC Economics Working Paper 1999-1 (1999)
  45. Tenhundfeld, Mark J., "Banking and Commerce: 1+1=0, The mixing of banking and Commerce", FRB Chicago, ~ (2007)
  46. An international comparison of banking regulatory structures, A staff study for the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, "The U.S. House of Representatives 101st Congress", ~ (1990)
  47. U.S. Department of Treasury, "STATEMENT BY PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON AT THE SIGNING OF THE FINANCIAL MODERNIZATION BILL", ~ (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)