본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

금산분리 완화에 관한 법적 연구 - 완화방안과 문제점 해소를 중심으로 -

A Legal Study on the Relaxation of the Separation of Banking and Commerce

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

In this dissertation, studying the history, theory about the relaxation of the separation of banking and commerce, and the supervision system for the company combined banking and commerce are main topics. There are many types of the separation and combination of banking and commerce according to the historic background and the development of capital market of each countries. Most of the European countries operate the combination of banking and commerce system. But U.S.A. does the separation of banking and commerce system. Our nation has the separation of banking and commerce system similar to the U.S.A. To develop our financial industry, to spread it to the world, and to meet the principle of free market economy in our Constitution, we have to pursuit the combination of banking and commerce rather than the separation of banking and commerce. If we adopt the combination of banking and commerce, according to the theory of economy of scale and scope we can have the competition of internal and international dimension on the financial industry. Furthermore this is the trend of the world banking and commerce system at least by the number of the countries and legal system. Then the bottom line is how to design the combination of the banking and commerce. In this dissertation, two main ways are suggested. One is to expand the ceiling that the industrial capital and financial capital can own the stock of each others without any license. Another is to erase the ceiling, and adopt the licensing system. When the ceiling system is adopted, it must be made higher over 33% for the full development of financial industry and for fulfilling the principle of free market economy in our Constitution. And When the licensing system is selected, whenever industrial company owns over 15/100, 33/100, 50/100 of the stock, it has to be licensed by the financial authority every time. Lastly to eliminate the concerning of the harming the safety and soundness by permitting the combination of banking and commerce, we have to establish the elaborate supervision system for the company combined banking and commerce. Those are reducing the limitation of large granting of credit, tightly supervising the commerce that owns banking, adopting the Source of Strength Doctrine, reforming corporate governance system, etc.

Abstract

In this dissertation, studying the history, theory about the relaxation of the separation of banking and commerce, and the supervision system for the company combined banking and commerce are main topics. There are many types of the separation and combination of banking and commerce according to the historic background and the development of capital market of each countries. Most of the European countries operate the combination of banking and commerce system. But U.S.A. does the separation of banking and commerce system. Our nation has the separation of banking and commerce system similar to the U.S.A. To develop our financial industry, to spread it to the world, and to meet the principle of free market economy in our Constitution, we have to pursuit the combination of banking and commerce rather than the separation of banking and commerce. If we adopt the combination of banking and commerce, according to the theory of economy of scale and scope we can have the competition of internal and international dimension on the financial industry. Furthermore this is the trend of the world banking and commerce system at least by the number of the countries and legal system. Then the bottom line is how to design the combination of the banking and commerce. In this dissertation, two main ways are suggested. One is to expand the ceiling that the industrial capital and financial capital can own the stock of each others without any license. Another is to erase the ceiling, and adopt the licensing system. When the ceiling system is adopted, it must be made higher over 33% for the full development of financial industry and for fulfilling the principle of free market economy in our Constitution. And When the licensing system is selected, whenever industrial company owns over 15/100, 33/100, 50/100 of the stock, it has to be licensed by the financial authority every time. Lastly to eliminate the concerning of the harming the safety and soundness by permitting the combination of banking and commerce, we have to establish the elaborate supervision system for the company combined banking and commerce. Those are reducing the limitation of large granting of credit, tightly supervising the commerce that owns banking, adopting the Source of Strength Doctrine, reforming corporate governance system, etc.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Adam Feibelman, "NINTEENTH ANNUAL CORPORATE LAW SYMPOSIUM: DEBT AS A LEVER OF CONTROL: COMMERCIAL LENDING AND THE SEPARATION OF BANKING AND COMMERCE", Univesity of Cincinnati Law Review (2007)
  2. Anthony Saunders, "Banking and Commerce: An Overview of the Policy Issues", Journal of Banking and Finance, 18, pp.231~ (1994)
  3. Arther E. Wilmarth, Jr, "REGULATING WAL-MART: IS BIGGER BETTER IN BANKING: Article: Wal-Mart and the Separation of Banking and Commerce", Conneticut Law Review (2007)
  4. Baum & Scott, "주주보호를 심각하게 고려하는가?: 미국과 독일의 기업지배구조", 증권법연구, 8(1), pp.373~426 (2007), 한국증권법학회
  5. Carl Felsenfeld, "BUSINESS DIVISION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE U..S. BANKING SYSTEM", Houston Business & Tax Law Journal (2003)
  6. Carl Felsenfeld, "THE BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT: HAS IT LIVED ITS LIFE?", Villanova University Villanova Law Review (1993)
  7. "MCorp Fin.,Inc v. Board of Goverrnors, 900 F.2D 852(5th Cir. 1990), rev`d on other grounds, 502 U.S. 32", ~ (1991)
  8. Patricia A. McCoy, "Banking Law Manual", pp.4.05~ (2000)
  9. 하능식, "산업자본과 금융자본 관계의 국제비교" (2007), 한국학술정보
  10. 김용재, "산업자본의 은행소유와 관련한 법적 쟁점", 증권법연구, 2(2) (2001), 한국증권법학회
  11. 김용재, "銀行規制의 바람직한 모습 —美國에서의 銀産分離政策을 모델로 하여—", 금융법연구, 5(2), pp.3~36 (2008), 한국금융법학회
  12. 금융규제와 시장원리에 관한 연구, "김종민", 한국금융연구원, 14~15 (2009)
  13. 김준경, "재벌의 제2금융권 금융기관 소유에 따른문제점", KDI경제전망, 16(1), pp.83~94 (1999), 한국개발연구원
  14. 은행의 소유지배구조에 관한 연구, "박경서", 한국금융연구원, 30~, pp.정책조사보고서 97-05 (1997)
  15. 이경형, "일본 금융청, 은행업 진출 이업종 기업에 대한 규제안 마련", 주간 국제금융동향, pp.17~19 (2000), 한국금융연구원
  16. 이명활, "금융그룹의 바람직한 통합리스크 관리", 금주의 논단, 20(25), pp.3~5 (2011), 한국금융연구원
  17. 이병윤, "금산분리 관련 제도의 현황과 논점", 금융연구, 20 (2006), 한국금융연구원
  18. 이병윤, "국내은행산업의 경쟁력 제고 방안", 주간 금융브리프, 금주의 논단, 20(23) (2011), 한국금융연구원
  19. 이병윤, "금산분리 관련 제도의 현황과 논점", 금융연구, 20, pp.21~ (2006), 한국금융연구원
  20. 금융회사 불공정거래에 대한 규제체계: 해외사례를 중심으로, "이병윤", 한국금융연구원, 2~4 (2007)
  21. 이인실, "금산분리완화: 논리적 근거와 정책방향", pp.35~ (2008), 한국금융학회
  22. 정경영, "영국과 미국의 금융서비스 및 시장 관련 법제 연구", pp.89~ (2007), 법제처
  23. 최승재, "은행 및 금융지주회사의 소유지배구조에 대한 연구 ―미국 및 독일에서의 역사적인 전개 및 입법론을 포함하여", 증권법연구, 9(1), pp.363~422 (2008), 한국증권법학회
  24. 최승희, "기업집단의 금융겸업구조분석을 통한 금융산업의 소유구조정책방향 모색", 16(4), pp.47~80 (1994), 한국개발연구원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (37건)