본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

최남선의 국토순례기행문에 나타난 자연인식과 생태적 문명관

Nature Recognition and Ecological View of Civilization through Travel essays of Choi Nam-Sun

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류문학

초록

This article is trying to prove Nature recognition and View of civilization through travel essays of Choi Nam-sun. Choi Nam-sun took part in a country trip in mid-1920s. Most of discussion about his travel essays have been focused on aspects of his nationalism, though there are other things that couldn't explain through this point of view. Choi seems to have the distinct nature recognition that The other, wrote travel essays in the same period, didn't have shown. That is, Choi criticize the human civilization and praise Nature, saying Nature have real beauty and truth. Moreover he encounter sanctity of nature in Mt. Baek-du, and Mt. Kum-gang and etc, where he believed sacred place in Korean peninsula. Thus to him, this travel was like a pilgrimage to the Holy Land. When Choi reached “Choen-Pyong”(“천평”) in Mt. Baek-du, his mythic imagination was maximized. He not only knew about mythic, but also had mind of worship nature like the ancients. Choi explained the ancients have belief that the soul return to their ancestor's mountain when people passed away. Each ethnic groups in East Asia have their own mountain and that mountain is regarded as sacred place where each soul of ethnic groups would return. Also, Choi insist that haman being can recover his own true nate by returning back to nature in his travel essays. He named this ancient people's spirit, spirit of 'returning'. Meanwhile this should not confused with the Europe Romantist's slogan, Jean Jacques Rousseau's “Retour a la nature(Come back to nature)" representatively. Futhermore Choi understood nature like mother who give birth to human being and take care of them. This point of view have important meaning, because some researchers argue recently turning back a matriarchal society instead of today's violent patriarchal society. Also Choi told he want to new civilization community(“Sae-Nara”, “새 나라”), not human-dominated, the divine nature-dominated community. The way of his thought is different to recent critics of nation-state, don't consider importance of nature.

Abstract

This article is trying to prove Nature recognition and View of civilization through travel essays of Choi Nam-sun. Choi Nam-sun took part in a country trip in mid-1920s. Most of discussion about his travel essays have been focused on aspects of his nationalism, though there are other things that couldn't explain through this point of view. Choi seems to have the distinct nature recognition that The other, wrote travel essays in the same period, didn't have shown. That is, Choi criticize the human civilization and praise Nature, saying Nature have real beauty and truth. Moreover he encounter sanctity of nature in Mt. Baek-du, and Mt. Kum-gang and etc, where he believed sacred place in Korean peninsula. Thus to him, this travel was like a pilgrimage to the Holy Land. When Choi reached “Choen-Pyong”(“천평”) in Mt. Baek-du, his mythic imagination was maximized. He not only knew about mythic, but also had mind of worship nature like the ancients. Choi explained the ancients have belief that the soul return to their ancestor's mountain when people passed away. Each ethnic groups in East Asia have their own mountain and that mountain is regarded as sacred place where each soul of ethnic groups would return. Also, Choi insist that haman being can recover his own true nate by returning back to nature in his travel essays. He named this ancient people's spirit, spirit of 'returning'. Meanwhile this should not confused with the Europe Romantist's slogan, Jean Jacques Rousseau's “Retour a la nature(Come back to nature)" representatively. Futhermore Choi understood nature like mother who give birth to human being and take care of them. This point of view have important meaning, because some researchers argue recently turning back a matriarchal society instead of today's violent patriarchal society. Also Choi told he want to new civilization community(“Sae-Nara”, “새 나라”), not human-dominated, the divine nature-dominated community. The way of his thought is different to recent critics of nation-state, don't consider importance of nature.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. "육당최남선전집전집" (1973), 현암사
  2. "동아일보", ~
  3. "소년", ~
  4. "조선일보", ~
  5. 구인모, "국토순례와 민족의 자기구성-근대 국토기행문의 문학사적 의의", 한국문학연구, 17 (2004), 한국문학연구소
  6. 김열규, "동북아시아 샤머니즘과 신화론" (2004), 아카넷
  7. 김헌선, "한국의 창세신화" (1994), 길벗
  8. 류시현, "여행과 기행문을 통한 민족`민족사의 재인식: 최남선의 사례를 중심으로", 史叢, (64), pp.103~130 (2007), 역사학연구회
  9. 리안 아이슬러, "성배와 칼" (2006), 비체
  10. 백영서, "동아시아의 지역질서:제국을 넘어 공동체로" (2005), 창작과 비평사
  11. 복도훈, "미와 정치: 국토순례의 목가적 서사시―최남선의『금강예찬』,『백두산근참기』를 중심으로", 한국근대문학연구, 12(12), pp.37~62 (2005), 한국근대문학회
  12. 서영채, "기원의 신화를 향해 가는 길: 최남선의 『백두산 근참기』", 한국근대문학연구, 12(12), pp.96~138 (2005), 한국근대문학회
  13. 안재홍, "민세 안재홍 선집 4권" (1992), 지식산업사
  14. 안지영, "1910-1920년대 ‘조선주의' 연구", 석사, pp.2010
  15. 윤영실, "최남선의 근대적 글쓰기와 민족담론 연구", 박사, pp.2008
  16. 조지프 캠벨, "신의 가면3 - 서양신화" (2006), 까치
  17. 주강현, "우리 문화의 수수께끼 2" (2006), 한겨레출판
  18. 최현식, "민족과 국토의 심미화", 한국시학연구, (15), pp.181~206 (2006), 한국시학회
  19. 츠베탕 토도로프, "덧없는 행복" (2006), 문학과 지성사
  20. 홍윤기, "일본의 역사왜곡" (2001), 학민사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)