Toward Noncoercive Environmentalism
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As in the other fields of metaphysics, the foundationalist view of nature needs to be contested by deconstructive discourses. Deep Ecology, one of our own contemporary eco-centrism takes Self-realization and bioregional egalitarianism as its logical fulcrums. As we see in the historical view of American nature which is examined by Hans Huth, William Cronon and Roderick Nash, nature has been named and defined to meet the individual and/or collective desire or interests of naming or defining subjects. Deep Ecology needs to articulate marginalized voices in terms of gender, race and class because any practically efficient environmentalism cannot be generated without criticizing the interconnected logic of all discriminations. Above all, Deep Ecology must accept a logical limitation lurking in the 'intrinsic value' of nature, thus, its coercive view of nature. When Deep Ecology include those challenging voices within its logical program, it could possibly better-promote our eco-friendly theory and its implementation.
Abstract
As in the other fields of metaphysics, the foundationalist view of nature needs to be contested by deconstructive discourses. Deep Ecology, one of our own contemporary eco-centrism takes Self-realization and bioregional egalitarianism as its logical fulcrums. As we see in the historical view of American nature which is examined by Hans Huth, William Cronon and Roderick Nash, nature has been named and defined to meet the individual and/or collective desire or interests of naming or defining subjects. Deep Ecology needs to articulate marginalized voices in terms of gender, race and class because any practically efficient environmentalism cannot be generated without criticizing the interconnected logic of all discriminations. Above all, Deep Ecology must accept a logical limitation lurking in the 'intrinsic value' of nature, thus, its coercive view of nature. When Deep Ecology include those challenging voices within its logical program, it could possibly better-promote our eco-friendly theory and its implementation.
참고문헌 (17)
- Bradford, George, "How Deep Is Deep Ecology?" (1989), Hadley, Mass times change Press
- Cronon, William, "Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England" (1993), Hill and Wang
- Cronon, William, "Kennecott Journey: the Paths our of Town. In Under an Open Sky", pp.28~51 (1992), Norton
- Derrida, Jacques, "Of Grammatology" (1976), Johns Hopkins
- Devall, Bill, "Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered" (1985), Gibbs Smith
- French, William C, "Against Biospherical Egalitarianism", Environmental Ethics, 17, pp.39~57 (1995)
- Huth, Hans, "Nature and the American: Three Centuries of Changing Attitudes" (1957), U of Nabraska P
- Leopold, Aldo, "A Sand County Almanac" (1991), Ballantine Books
- Nash, Roderick, "Wilderness and the American Mind. 3rd ed" (1982), Yale U P
- Quigley, Peter, "Rethinking Resistance: Environmentalism, Literature, and Poststructural Theory", Environmental Ethics, 14, pp.291~306 (1992)
- Reed, Peter, "Wisdom in the Open Air" (1993), U of Minnesota P
- Ryan, Michael, "Marxism and Deconstruction" (1982), Johns Hopkins U P
- Salleh, Ariel, "Class, Race, and Gender Discourse in the Ecofeminism", Deep Ecology Debate, 1993, pp.15, 225~244
- Salleh, Ariel, "Deeper than Deep Ecology: The Eco-Feminist Connection", Environmental Ethics, 6, pp.339~345 (1984)
- Salleh, Ariel, "The Ecofeminism", Deep Ecology Debate: A Reply to Patriarchal Reason, 1992, pp.14, 195~216
- Spurr, David, "Naturalization: The Wilderness in Human Form.In The Rhetoric of Empire", pp.156~169 (1993), Duke U P
- Weedon, Chris, "Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory" (1987), Basil Blackwell