본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Conversation Analysis of Online Video Corpus of Pre-service English Teachers’ Mock-teaching

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This study is a online based video analysis of pre-service teachers’ teaching training. Adopting conversation analysis(CA) of video recorded corpus and Vygotskian view of language and cognition, this study investigated teacher talk focusing on the following issues: the way of repair mechanism and use of discourse marker(DM) revealed in pre-service English teacher interaction; and the cognitive functions of the repair sequences and ‘okay.’ Three sets of fifteen minute video recorded data was transcribed and sorted by the types of repair sequences and the use of ‘okay.’ We found that the recurrent types of repair in mock-teaching data were other-initiated self-repair(OSR: teacher-initiated student-repair), self-initiated self-repair with repetition(SSR: teacher-initiated teacher-repair), and SSR without repetition(teacher-initiated teacher-repair). As for the use of most frequently found DM, we found the multifunctional use of ‘okay’ especially in teacher talk. In addition to the result, this video analysis of classroom interaction is beneficial to the current online and offline teacher training program in the point that it mirrors the actual teaching performance to the self so that the pre-service teachers can finely recognize their conversational flaw and recurring patterns.

Abstract

This study is a online based video analysis of pre-service teachers’ teaching training. Adopting conversation analysis(CA) of video recorded corpus and Vygotskian view of language and cognition, this study investigated teacher talk focusing on the following issues: the way of repair mechanism and use of discourse marker(DM) revealed in pre-service English teacher interaction; and the cognitive functions of the repair sequences and ‘okay.’ Three sets of fifteen minute video recorded data was transcribed and sorted by the types of repair sequences and the use of ‘okay.’ We found that the recurrent types of repair in mock-teaching data were other-initiated self-repair(OSR: teacher-initiated student-repair), self-initiated self-repair with repetition(SSR: teacher-initiated teacher-repair), and SSR without repetition(teacher-initiated teacher-repair). As for the use of most frequently found DM, we found the multifunctional use of ‘okay’ especially in teacher talk. In addition to the result, this video analysis of classroom interaction is beneficial to the current online and offline teacher training program in the point that it mirrors the actual teaching performance to the self so that the pre-service teachers can finely recognize their conversational flaw and recurring patterns.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Z. Gabillon, "Using video recorded corpus to analyze classroom interactions in elementary school EFL Classes", TOJET, pp.949~969 (2017)
  2. L. S. Vygotsky, "Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes" (1978), Harvard University
  3. E. A. Schegloff, "Socially shared cognition", pp.150~171 (1991), APA
  4. N. Markee, "Conversation analysis" (2000), Mahwah
  5. P. Seedhouse, "The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective" (2004), Blackwell Publishing
  6. J. Wong, "Conversation Analysis and second language pedagogy" (2010), Routledge
  7. J. Sinclair, "Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils" (1975), Oxford University Press
  8. Drew Fagan, "Okay as a Multifunctional Resource for Giving Feedback in Classrooms", 언어와 정보 사회, 16, pp.9~41 (2012), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  9. Y. A. Lee, "Third turn position in teacher talk:Contingency and the work of teaching", Journal of Pragmatics, 39, pp.1204~1230 (2007)
  10. H. Z. Waring, "Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities", The Modern Language Journal, 92, pp.577~594 (2008)
  11. J. Wong, "‘Very good’ as a teacher response", ELT Journal, 63, pp.195~203 (2009)
  12. E. A. Schegloff, "The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation", Language, 53, pp.361~382 (1977)
  13. I. Hutchby, "Conversation analysis" (1998), Blackwell
  14. P. M. Clancy, "The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin", Journal of Pragmatics, 26, pp.355~387 (1996)
  15. R. Gardner, "When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance" (2002), Benjamins
  16. E. A. Schegloff, "Opening up closings", Semiotica, 7, pp.289~327 (1973)
  17. W. Beach, "Transitional regularities for ‘casual’‘‘Okay’’ usages", Journal of Pragmatics, 19, pp.325~352 (1993)
  18. W. Beach, "The consequentiality of communication", pp.121~161 (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  19. 이진아, "Reactive Expressions in Private Speech: Interactional Dynamics", 응용언어학, 27(3), pp.129~156 (2011), 한국응용언어학회
  20. E. A. Schegloff, "Sequence organization" (2007), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)