본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

편도선 절제술 환자에서 사용하는 수술기구들의 효용성 비교

Comparing the Efficacy of Surgical Instruments in Tonsillectomy Patients

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류이비인후과학

초록

Background and Objectives: To compare the efficacy of three surgical methods in tonsillectomy patients; combination of monopolar and bipolar diathermy (diathermy), coblation dissection using Evac (coblation), Harmonic scalpel assisted dissection (harmonic). Materials and Methods: Ninety-seven patients underwent tonsillectomy in a single institute between January 2020 and May 2021. Postoperative pain was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) on postoperative 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. Degree of epithelization (DOE) was measured to assess recovery state on follow up period. Lastly, we compared operative time among the three groups to evaluate surgical efficacy. Results: Significant differences have been observed among three groups in operative time, postoperative pain score and DOE evaluated on week 1, 2, and 4. Both Harmonic and coblation group had significantly lower VAS and higher DOE, when compared with diathermy group. As for operative time, coblation group showed shorter operative time compared to other two groups. Conclusion: Both coblation and harmonic group showed better postoperative results when compared to diathermy method. Coblation and harmonic assisted tonsillectomy may be a safe, and effective method for tonsillectomy.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: To compare the efficacy of three surgical methods in tonsillectomy patients; combination of monopolar and bipolar diathermy (diathermy), coblation dissection using Evac (coblation), Harmonic scalpel assisted dissection (harmonic). Materials and Methods: Ninety-seven patients underwent tonsillectomy in a single institute between January 2020 and May 2021. Postoperative pain was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) on postoperative 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. Degree of epithelization (DOE) was measured to assess recovery state on follow up period. Lastly, we compared operative time among the three groups to evaluate surgical efficacy. Results: Significant differences have been observed among three groups in operative time, postoperative pain score and DOE evaluated on week 1, 2, and 4. Both Harmonic and coblation group had significantly lower VAS and higher DOE, when compared with diathermy group. As for operative time, coblation group showed shorter operative time compared to other two groups. Conclusion: Both coblation and harmonic group showed better postoperative results when compared to diathermy method. Coblation and harmonic assisted tonsillectomy may be a safe, and effective method for tonsillectomy.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Gerbershagen HJ, "Pain intensity on the first day after surgery : a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures", Anesthesiology, 118(4), pp.934~944 (2013)
  2. Sergeev VN, "A new method of high-frequency electrosurgery(coblation technology)", Med Tekh, 37(1), pp.21~23 (2003)
  3. Temple RH, "Paediatric coblation tonsillectomy", Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 61(3), pp.195~198 (2001)
  4. Shapiro NL, "Cold dissection versus coblation-assisted adenotonsillectomy in children", Laryngoscope, 117(3), pp.406~410 (2007)
  5. Fenton RS, "Ultrasonic tonsillectomy", J Otolaryngol, 29(6), pp.348~350 (2000)
  6. Cushing SL, "Evaluating postoperative pain in monopolar cautery versus harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 141(6), pp.710~715 (2009)
  7. Pinder DK, "Dissection versus diathermy for tonsillectomy", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011(3), pp.CD002211~ (2011)
  8. Warnock FF, "Pain progression, intensity and outcomes following tonsillectomy", Pain, 75(1), pp.37~45 (1998)
  9. Gallagher TQ, "Analyzing factors associated with major complications after adenotonsillectomy in 4776 patients : comparing three tonsillectomy techniques", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 142(6), pp.886~892 (2010)
  10. Nithya V, "A comparative study of coblation assissted adenotonsillectomy and cold dissection adenotonsillectomy in children", Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 3(1), pp.122~127 (2017)
  11. Woloszko J, "Coblation technology : plasma-mediated ablation for otolaryngology applications", Proceedings of the SPIE, 3907, pp.306~316 (2000)
  12. "Clinical Guidelines (nursing): pain assessment and measurement" (2019)[URL]
  13. Mitic S, "A pilot randomized controlled trial of coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy with bipolar diathermy haemostasis", Clin Otolaryngol, 32(4), pp.261~267 (2007)
  14. Rakesh S, "A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of coblation versus dissection tonsillectomy in adult patients", Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 64(3), pp.290~294 (2012)
  15. Noordzij JP, "Coblation versus unipolar electrocautery tonsillectomy : a prospective, randomized, single-blind study in adult patients", Laryngoscope, 116(8), pp.1303~1309 (2006)
  16. Gossot D, "Ultrasonic dissection for endoscopic surgery. The E. A. E. S. Technology Group", Surg Endosc, 13(4), pp.412~417 (1999)
  17. Parsons SP, "Comparison of posttonsillectomy pain using the ultrasonic scalpel, coblator, and electrocautery", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 134(1), pp.106~113 (2006)
  18. Wiatrak BJ, "Harmonic scalpel for tonsillectomy", Laryngoscope, 112(8 Pt 2 Suppl 100), pp.14~16 (2002)
  19. Walker RA, "Harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy versus electrocautery tonsillectomy : a comparative pilot study", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 125(5), pp.449~455 (2001)
  20. Collison PJ, "Harmonic scalpel versus conventional tonsillectomy : a double-blind clinical trial", Ear Nose Throat J, 83(10), pp.707~710 (2004)
  21. Akural EI, "Post-tonsillectomy pain : a prospective, randomised and double-blinded study to compare an ultrasonically activated scalpel technique with the blunt dissection technique", Anaesthesia, 56(11), pp.1045~1050 (2001)
  22. Leaper M, "A prospective randomised single blinded study comparing harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy with bipolar tonsillectomy", Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 70(8), pp.1389~1396 (2006)
  23. Pajić-Penavić I, "Postoperative quality of life after two different methods of tonsillectomy", Wien Klin Wochenschr, 125(17-18), pp.524~528 (2013)
  24. Basu S, "Harmonic scalpel versus coblation tonsillectomy a comparative study", Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 71(4), pp.498~503 (2019)
  25. Subasi B, "Comparison of three tonsillectomy techniques in children", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 278(6), pp.2011~2015 (2021)

관련 논문AI추천

편도절제술의 4가지 기법에 대한 비교김남국, 김대웅, 김위황, 김주영, 오현명, 최동진대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2013 · 제56권 제12호편도절제술 수술 방법에 따른 술 후 통증 비교 : 고식적인 방법, 섬유소 응고제 국소도포와 Coblation 비교 분석김정석, 이시영, 이현민, 정광태, 한주희대한이비인후과학회 부산,울산,경남 지부회 · 임상이비인후과2013 · 제24권 제1호Coblation vs. Electrocautery Tonsillectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes in Adolescents and Adults우정수, 이흥만, 조재구, 채성원, 홍성문대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2013 · 제6권 제2호편도 적출술시 섬유소 응고제(Tachocomb^Ⓡ)이통증 조절에 미치는 영향구수권, 김양재, 김현규, 송창윤, 조규섭, 최장원대한이비인후과학회 부산,울산,경남 지부회 · 임상이비인후과2011 · 제22권 제2호Coblation 편도절제술과 전통적 박리 편도절제술의 비교김병국, 박소영, 박홍진, 정현철, 조진희대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2007 · 제50권 제7호Comparison of Functional Outcomes after Powered Intracapsular Tonsillectomy with Adenoidectomy and Conventional Extracapsular Tonsillectomy with Adenoidectomy for Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea김정록, 박일호, 방승환, 송재준, 신재민, 우정수, 이종근, 전재민, 채성원대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2020 · 제63권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)