본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Coblation vs. Electrocautery Tonsillectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes in Adolescents and Adults

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives. Coblation is operated in low temperature, so it is proposed that tonsillectomy with coblation involves less postoperative pain and allows accelerated healing of the tonsillar fossae compared with other methods involving heat driven processes. However, the results of the previous studies showed that the effect of coblation tonsillectomy has been equivocal in terms of postoperative pain and hemorrhage. Though, most of the previous studies which evaluated coblation tonsillectomy were performed in children. Recently, electrocautery tonsillectomy has been used most widely because of the reduced intraoperative blood loss and shorter operative time compared to other techniques. This prospective study compared intraoperative records and postoperative clinical outcomes in adolescents and adults following coblation and electrocautery tonsillectomies. Methods. Eighty patients over 16 years of age with histories of recurrent tonsillitis were enrolled. The patients were randomly allocated into coblation (n=40) and electrocautery tonsillectomy groups (n=40). All operations were performed by one surgeon who was skilled in both surgical techniques. Intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes were checked. Results. Postoperative pain and otalgia were not significantly different between the two groups; however, there was a tendency towards reduced pain and otalgia in the coblation group. More cotton balls for swabbing the operative field were used introoperatively in the electrocautery group (P=0.00). There was no significant difference in postoperative hemorrhage,wound healing, commencement of a regular diet, and foreign body sensation between the groups. Conclusion. Only cotton use, which represented the amount of blood loss, was less in the coblation tonsillectomy group. Coblation tonsillectomy warrants further study with respect to the decreased postoperative pain and otalgia.

Abstract

Objectives. Coblation is operated in low temperature, so it is proposed that tonsillectomy with coblation involves less postoperative pain and allows accelerated healing of the tonsillar fossae compared with other methods involving heat driven processes. However, the results of the previous studies showed that the effect of coblation tonsillectomy has been equivocal in terms of postoperative pain and hemorrhage. Though, most of the previous studies which evaluated coblation tonsillectomy were performed in children. Recently, electrocautery tonsillectomy has been used most widely because of the reduced intraoperative blood loss and shorter operative time compared to other techniques. This prospective study compared intraoperative records and postoperative clinical outcomes in adolescents and adults following coblation and electrocautery tonsillectomies. Methods. Eighty patients over 16 years of age with histories of recurrent tonsillitis were enrolled. The patients were randomly allocated into coblation (n=40) and electrocautery tonsillectomy groups (n=40). All operations were performed by one surgeon who was skilled in both surgical techniques. Intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes were checked. Results. Postoperative pain and otalgia were not significantly different between the two groups; however, there was a tendency towards reduced pain and otalgia in the coblation group. More cotton balls for swabbing the operative field were used introoperatively in the electrocautery group (P=0.00). There was no significant difference in postoperative hemorrhage,wound healing, commencement of a regular diet, and foreign body sensation between the groups. Conclusion. Only cotton use, which represented the amount of blood loss, was less in the coblation tonsillectomy group. Coblation tonsillectomy warrants further study with respect to the decreased postoperative pain and otalgia.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Belloso A, "Coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy: postoperative hemorrhage", Laryngoscope, 113(11), pp.2010~2013 (2003)
  2. Plant RL, "Radiofrequency treatment of tonsillar hypertrophy", Laryngoscope, 112(8 Pt 2 Suppl 100), pp.20~22 (2002)
  3. Burton MJ, "Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (3), pp.CD004619~ (2007)
  4. Mitic S, "A pilot randomized controlled trial of coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy with bipolar diathermy haemostasis", Clin Otolaryngol, 32(4), pp.261~267 (2007)
  5. Parker D, "A randomised controlled trial to compare postoperative pain in children undergoing tonsillectomy using cold steel dissection with bipolar haemostasis versus coblation technique", Clin Otolaryngol, 34(3), pp.225~231 (2009)
  6. Curtin JM, "The history of tonsil and adenoid surgery", Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 20(2), pp.415~419 (1987)
  7. Maddern BR, "Electrosurgery for tonsillectomy", Laryngoscope, 112(8 Pt 2 Suppl 100), pp.11~13 (2002)
  8. Lowe D, "Tonsillectomy technique as a risk factor for postoperative haemorrhage", Lancet, 364(9435), pp.697~702 (2004)
  9. Shah UK, "Coblation for tonsillectomy: an evidence-based review", ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 69(6), pp.349~357 (2007)
  10. Stoker KE, "Pediatric total tonsillectomy using coblation compared to conventional electrosurgery: a prospective, controlled single-blind study", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 130(6), pp.666~675 (2004)
  11. Parsons SP, "Comparison of posttonsillectomy pain using the ultrasonic scalpel, coblator, and electrocautery", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 134(1), pp.106~113 (2006)
  12. Polites N, "Postoperative pain following coblation tonsillectomy: randomized clinical trial", ANZ J Surg, 76(4), pp.226~229 (2006)
  13. Philpott CM, "A double-blinded randomized controlled trial of coblation versus conventional dissection tonsillectomy on post-operative symptoms", Clin Otolaryngol, 30(2), pp.143~148 (2005)
  14. Shah UK, "Tonsillectomy by means of plasma-mediated ablation: prospective, randomized, blinded comparison with monopolar electrosurgery", Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 128(6), pp.672~676 (2002)
  15. Friedman M, "Radiofrequency tonsil reduction: safety, morbidity, and efficacy", Laryngoscope, 113(5), pp.882~887 (2003)
  16. Glade RS, "Coblation adenotonsillectomy: an improvement over electrocautery technique?", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 134(5), pp.852~855 (2006)
  17. Timms MS, "Coblation tonsillectomy: a double blind randomized controlled study", J Laryngol Otol, 116(6), pp.450~452 (2002)
  18. Chang KW, "Randomized controlled trial of Coblation versus electrocautery tonsillectomy", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 132(2), pp.273~280 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

편도절제술의 4가지 기법에 대한 비교김남국, 김대웅, 김위황, 김주영, 오현명, 최동진대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2013 · 제56권 제12호편도선 절제술 환자에서 사용하는 수술기구들의 효용성 비교김상훈, 김성동, 박지환, 이갑균, 조규섭대한이비인후과학회 부산,울산,경남 지부회 · 임상이비인후과2022 · 제33권 제1호편도절제술 수술 방법에 따른 술 후 통증 비교 : 고식적인 방법, 섬유소 응고제 국소도포와 Coblation 비교 분석김정석, 이시영, 이현민, 정광태, 한주희대한이비인후과학회 부산,울산,경남 지부회 · 임상이비인후과2013 · 제24권 제1호Advantages of Cold-knife Dissection with Adjunctive Suction Cauterization Adenotonsillectomy: A Useful and Safe Surgical Technique for Pediatric Patients김연지, 박시내, 박정미, 서재현, 한재상대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2021 · 제64권 제6호편도 적출술시 섬유소 응고제(Tachocomb^Ⓡ)이통증 조절에 미치는 영향구수권, 김양재, 김현규, 송창윤, 조규섭, 최장원대한이비인후과학회 부산,울산,경남 지부회 · 임상이비인후과2011 · 제22권 제2호Coblation 편도절제술과 전통적 박리 편도절제술의 비교김병국, 박소영, 박홍진, 정현철, 조진희대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2007 · 제50권 제7호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)