본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Predictors of Positive or Close Surgical Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Patients with Breast Cancer

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the clinical and pathological factors associated with a higher rate of positive or close margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) by comparing these patients to patients with a negative margin. The second aim was to evaluate intraoperative resection margin status and reoperation rates for margin control in patients who underwent BCS. Methods: We reviewed the clinical and pathological data of all women diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at our institution between January 2006 and December 2016. Results: During the 10-year study period, 785 patients were diagnosed with either IBC or DCIS, and 402 of these patients had undergone a total mastectomy as the primary treatment. The remaining 383 patients who underwent BCS were included in the final analysis. Of these, 100 patients (26.1%) had intraoperative positive or close margins. The remaining 283 patients (73.9%) had a negative margin intraoperatively, but 32 of these patients had positive or close margins on permanent sections. In the multivariate analyses, microcalcifications on mammograms (vs. none; odds ratio [OR], 1.911; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.156–3.160), in situ carcinomas larger than 2.0 cm (vs. ≤2.0 cm; OR, 3.106; 95% CI, 1.193–8.086), and lumpectomy (vs. quadrantectomy; OR, 2.863; 95% CI, 1.268–6.622) showed a significant association with a positive or close surgical margins. Patients with intraoperative positive or close margins underwent more reoperation than those with negative margins (5.0% vs. 2.8%). Conclusion: After BCS, microcalcifications on mammograms, large-sized in situ carcinomas, and lumpectomy were more likely to have positive or close margins.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the clinical and pathological factors associated with a higher rate of positive or close margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) by comparing these patients to patients with a negative margin. The second aim was to evaluate intraoperative resection margin status and reoperation rates for margin control in patients who underwent BCS. Methods: We reviewed the clinical and pathological data of all women diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at our institution between January 2006 and December 2016. Results: During the 10-year study period, 785 patients were diagnosed with either IBC or DCIS, and 402 of these patients had undergone a total mastectomy as the primary treatment. The remaining 383 patients who underwent BCS were included in the final analysis. Of these, 100 patients (26.1%) had intraoperative positive or close margins. The remaining 283 patients (73.9%) had a negative margin intraoperatively, but 32 of these patients had positive or close margins on permanent sections. In the multivariate analyses, microcalcifications on mammograms (vs. none; odds ratio [OR], 1.911; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.156–3.160), in situ carcinomas larger than 2.0 cm (vs. ≤2.0 cm; OR, 3.106; 95% CI, 1.193–8.086), and lumpectomy (vs. quadrantectomy; OR, 2.863; 95% CI, 1.268–6.622) showed a significant association with a positive or close surgical margins. Patients with intraoperative positive or close margins underwent more reoperation than those with negative margins (5.0% vs. 2.8%). Conclusion: After BCS, microcalcifications on mammograms, large-sized in situ carcinomas, and lumpectomy were more likely to have positive or close margins.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Heron M, "Deaths: leading causes for 2004", Natl Vital Stat Rep, 56, pp.1~95 (2007)
  2. Veronesi U, "Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast- conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer", N Engl J Med, 347, pp.1227~1232 (2002)[DOI]
  3. Renton SC, "The importance of the resection margin in conservative surgery for breast cancer", Eur J Surg Oncol, 22, pp.17~22 (1996)[DOI]
  4. Meric F, "Positive surgical margins and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence predict disease-specific survival after breast-conserving therapy", Cancer, 97, pp.926~933 (2003)[DOI]
  5. Smitt MC, "Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation", Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 57, pp.979~985 (2003)[DOI]
  6. Mirza NQ, "Predictors of locoregional recurrence among patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy", Ann Surg Oncol, 9, pp.256~265 (2002)[DOI]
  7. Cheng L, "Relationship between the size and margin status of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and residual disease", J Natl Cancer Inst, 89, pp.1356~1360 (1997)[DOI]
  8. Neuschatz AC, "The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast", Cancer, 94, pp.1917~1924 (2002)[DOI]
  9. Silverstein MJ, "The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast", N Engl J Med, 340, pp.1455~1461 (1999)[DOI]
  10. "NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology, version 2"[URL]
  11. Moran MS, "Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer", J Clin Oncol, 32, pp.1507~1515 (2014)[DOI]
  12. Morrow M, "Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ", Pract Radiat Oncol, 6, pp.287~295 (2016)[DOI]
  13. Dai X, "Breast cancer intrinsic subtype classification, clinical use and future trends", Am J Cancer Res, 5, pp.2929~2943 (2015)
  14. Cheang MC, "Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer", J Natl Cancer Inst, 101, pp.736~750 (2009)[DOI]
  15. Fisher ER, "Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol 6). II. Relation of local breast recurrence to multicentricity", Cancer, 57, pp.1717~1724 (1986)[DOI]
  16. Dillon MF, "A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy", Ann Surg Oncol, 13, pp.333~339 (2006)[DOI]
  17. Luu HH, "The unsatisfactory margin in breast cancer surgery", Am J Surg, 178, pp.362~366 (1999)[DOI]
  18. Talsma AK, "Re-resection rates after breast-conserving surgery as a performance indicator: introduction of a case-mix model to allow comparison between Dutch hospitals", Eur J Surg Oncol, 37, pp.357~363 (2011)[DOI]
  19. Jeevan R, "Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics", BMJ, 345, pp.e4505~ (2012)[DOI]
  20. Lovrics PJ, "Systematic review of radioguided surgery for non-palpable breast cancer", Eur J Surg Oncol, 37, pp.388~397 (2011)[DOI]
  21. McGhan LJ, "Radioactive seed localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: review of 1,000 consecutive procedures at a single institution", Ann Surg Oncol, 18, pp.3096~3101 (2011)[DOI]
  22. Slijkhuis WA, "Ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery for early-stage palpable and nonpalpable invasive breast cancer: decreased excision volume at unchanged tumor-free resection margin", Breast Cancer Res Treat, 158, pp.535~541 (2016)[DOI]
  23. Noh WC, "Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving therapy: a comparison of quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy at a single institution", World J Surg, 29, pp.1001~1006 (2005)[DOI]
  24. Veronesi U, "Conservative treatment of breast cancer: a trial in progress at the Cancer Institute of Milan", Cancer, 39(6 Suppl), pp.2822~2826 (1977)[DOI]
  25. Veronesi U, "Quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy for small size breast cancer", Eur J Cancer, 26, pp.671~673 (1990)[DOI]
  26. Ramanah R, "Predictors of re-excision for positive or close margins in breast-conservation therapy for pT1 tumors", Am J Surg, 195, pp.770~774 (2008)[DOI]
  27. Dooley WC, "Understanding the mechanisms creating false positive lumpectomy margins", Am J Surg, 190, pp.606~608 (2005)[DOI]
  28. Ferreiro JA, "Accuracy of frozen-section diagnosis of mammographically directed breast biopsies: results of 1,490 consecutive cases", Am J Surg Pathol, 19, pp.1267~1271 (1995)[DOI]
  29. Sauter ER, "Is frozen section analysis of reexcision lumpectomy margins worthwhile? Margin analysis in breast reexcisions", Cancer, 73, pp.2607~2612 (1994)[DOI]
  30. Strong VE, "A novel method to localize antibody-targeted cancer deposits intraoperatively using handheld PET beta and gamma probes", Surg Endosc, 22, pp.386~391 (2008)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

No Association of Positive Superficial and/or Deep Margins with Local Recurrence in Invasive Breast Cancer Treated with Breast-Conserving Surgery고범석, 공경엽, 김성배, 김수산, 김지선, 김희정, 손귀연, 손병호, 안세현, 안승도, 윤태인, 이새별, 이종원, 정민성, 정일영대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2018 · 제50권 제1호Hormonal Receptor Positivity and Clinical Multifocality Are Independent Predisposing Factors for Positive Margin Events in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant ChemotherapyHa Woo Yi, Jeong Eon Lee, Jun Ho Lee, Se Kyung Lee, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim, Soo Youn Bae, Won Ho Kil한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2015 · 제3권 제1호Re-Excision Rate in Breast Conservation Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy강수환, 박정영, 배연경, 송정현, 이수정, 최정은한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2017 · 제5권 제1호Atypical Hyperplasia at the Margin of Frozen Sections from Breast-Conserving Surgery박민호, 유영재, 윤정한, 이지신, 조진성, HyoSoonLim, Yongmin Na한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2021 · 제9권 제2호Clinical Significance of Non-Mass-Like Enhancement of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer Considering Breast-Conserving SurgeryJin-Ok Kwon, Jung-Hyun Yang, Kyoung Sik Park, Min-Ji Park, Min-Young Park, Soo-Min Jung, Yeong-Beom Yu한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2018 · 제6권 제1호Preoperative Evaluation of Non-Mass-Like Enhancement on Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Measuring Tumor Extent and Affecting Surgical Margin Status in Breast Cancer PatientsChan Heun Park, Eun Young Kim, Seon Min Park, Yong Lai Park한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2022 · 제10권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)