본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Preoperative Evaluation of Non-Mass-Like Enhancement on Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Measuring Tumor Extent and Affecting Surgical Margin Status in Breast Cancer Patients

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: This study investigated the correlation between non-mass-like enhancement (NME) observed on preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the actual pathological size of breast cancer. We further examined the effect of NME on the positive resection margins during partial mastectomy. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from breast cancer patients who underwent surgery between January 2018 and September 2020. Patients were divided into two groups based on their MRI findings: NME and no-NME (mass-like lesion only) groups. The medical records, including MRI findings and clinicopathological information of patients, were collected retrospectively, and correlations with pathologic results were analyzed. Propensity score matching was applied to develop comparable cohorts of the NME group and no-NME group. Results: This study included a total of 317 patients, with 66 and 251 patients in the NME and no-NME groups, respectively. The mean pathologic size of invasive lesion was significantly smaller than the mean lesion size in the NME group (1.55±1.39 cm vs. 3.45±1.81 cm, p<0.001). The mean pathologic size of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions was larger than that in the NME group but without statistical significance (3.91±2.67 cm vs. 3.50±1.79 cm, p=0.326). In the NME group, NME estimated DCIS size to within 1 cm in 20 patients (30.3%) and overestimated invasive lesion size by more than 1 cm in 31 patients (46.9%). NME (vs. no-NME; odds ratio [OR], 2.967; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.878-10.025) showed a tendency to predict positive resection margins, but this was not statistically significant (p=0.080). Conclusion: NME findings on MRI showed a similar extent of DCIS lesions. NME findings on preoperative MRI should be considered an important factor for measuring the extent of tumors, especially in DCIS patients.

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the correlation between non-mass-like enhancement (NME) observed on preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the actual pathological size of breast cancer. We further examined the effect of NME on the positive resection margins during partial mastectomy. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from breast cancer patients who underwent surgery between January 2018 and September 2020. Patients were divided into two groups based on their MRI findings: NME and no-NME (mass-like lesion only) groups. The medical records, including MRI findings and clinicopathological information of patients, were collected retrospectively, and correlations with pathologic results were analyzed. Propensity score matching was applied to develop comparable cohorts of the NME group and no-NME group. Results: This study included a total of 317 patients, with 66 and 251 patients in the NME and no-NME groups, respectively. The mean pathologic size of invasive lesion was significantly smaller than the mean lesion size in the NME group (1.55±1.39 cm vs. 3.45±1.81 cm, p<0.001). The mean pathologic size of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions was larger than that in the NME group but without statistical significance (3.91±2.67 cm vs. 3.50±1.79 cm, p=0.326). In the NME group, NME estimated DCIS size to within 1 cm in 20 patients (30.3%) and overestimated invasive lesion size by more than 1 cm in 31 patients (46.9%). NME (vs. no-NME; odds ratio [OR], 2.967; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.878-10.025) showed a tendency to predict positive resection margins, but this was not statistically significant (p=0.080). Conclusion: NME findings on MRI showed a similar extent of DCIS lesions. NME findings on preoperative MRI should be considered an important factor for measuring the extent of tumors, especially in DCIS patients.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Heron M, "Deaths : leading causes for 2004", Natl Vital Stat Rep, 56, pp.1~95 (2007)
  2. American College of Radiology, "BI-RADS: Mammography. Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS – breast imaging atlas", American College of Radiology, ~ (2003)
  3. Rao AA, "A pictorial review of changes in the BI-RADS fifth edition", Radiographics, 36, pp.623~639 (2016)
  4. Schnall MD, "Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging : multicenter study", Radiology, 238, pp.42~53 (2006)
  5. Bartella L, "Nonpalpable mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRI", Am J Roentgenol, 186, pp.865~870 (2006)
  6. Thomassin-Naggara I, "Nonmasslike enhancement at breast MR imaging : the added value of mammography and US for lesion categorization", Radiology, 261, pp.69~79 (2011)
  7. Cho YH, "Significance of additional non-mass enhancement in patients with breast cancer on preoperative 3T dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast", Iran J Radiol, 13, pp.e30909~ (2016)
  8. Min-Ji Park, "Clinical Significance of Non-Mass-Like Enhancement of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer Considering Breast-Conserving Surgery", Journal of Breast Disease, 6(1), pp.20~24 (2018), 한국유방암학회[DOI]
  9. American College of Radiology, "ACR BI-RADS atlas : breast imaging reporting and data system", American College of Radiology, ~ (2013)
  10. Cheang MC, "Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer", J Natl Cancer Inst, 101, pp.736~750 (2009)
  11. Moran MS, "Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer", Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 88, pp.553~564 (2014)
  12. Morrow M, "Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ", Ann Surg Oncol, 23, pp.3801~3810 (2016)
  13. 강정현, "Identification of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with Positive Resection Margins in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study", Korean Journal of Radiology, 19(5), pp.897~904 (2018), 대한영상의학회[DOI]
  14. 장미정, "Magnetic Resonance Imaging Factors Predicting Re-excision in Breast Cancer Patients Having Undergone Conserving Therapy", Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 18(2), pp.133~143 (2014), 대한자기공명의과학회[DOI]
  15. Tozaki M, "High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions : interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors", Am J Roentgenol, 187, pp.330~337 (2006)
  16. Vag T, "Kinetic characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS)in dynamic breast MRI using computer-assisted analysis", Acta Radiol, 51, pp.955~961 (2010)
  17. Rosen EL, "BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ", Breast J, 13, pp.545~550 (2007)
  18. Daniel BL, "Breast disease : dynamic spiral MR imaging", Radiology, 209, pp.499~509 (1998)
  19. Boetes C, "False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors", Eur Radiol, 7, pp.1231~1234 (1997)
  20. Marcotte-Bloch C, "MRI for the size assessment of pure ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS) : a prospective study of 33 patients", Eur J Radiol, 77, pp.462~467 (2011)
  21. Lee J, "Efficacy of breast MRI for surgical decision in patients with breast cancer : ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive ductal carcinoma", BMC Cancer, 20, pp.934~ (2020)
  22. Jansen SA, "Pure ductal carcinoma in situ : kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade", Radiology, 245, pp.684~691 (2007)
  23. Miyashita M, "The clinical significance of breast MRI in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed on needle biopsy", Jpn J Clin Oncol, 43, pp.654~663 (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

Clinical Significance of Non-Mass-Like Enhancement of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer Considering Breast-Conserving SurgeryJin-Ok Kwon, Jung-Hyun Yang, Kyoung Sik Park, Min-Ji Park, Min-Young Park, Soo-Min Jung, Yeong-Beom Yu한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2018 · 제6권 제1호Magnetic Resonance Imaging Factors Predicting Re-excision in Breast Cancer Patients Having Undergone Conserving Therapy강은영, 김선미, 김성원, 김영미, 김지현, 박소연, 안혜신, 윤보라, 장미정대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2014 · 제18권 제2호Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Assessment of the Size of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ남석진, 박승민, 백현준, Bookyung Han, Ha Woo Yi, Jai Min Ryu, Jeong Eon Lee, Mansour Alramadhan, Musaed Rayzah한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2016 · 제4권 제2호Preoperative Prediction of Ductal Carcinoma in situ Underestimation of the Breast using Dynamic Contrast Enhanced and Diffusion-weighted Imaging김민정, 김은경, 문희정, 박미나대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2013 · 제17권 제2호유방 관상피내암에서 초음파와 MRI의 종양 크기 예측 정확도 비교강상율, 변정희, 안하림, 윤현조, 정성후한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2021 · 제9권 제2호조기 유방암에서 수술 전 유방초음파 및 유방 자기공명영상검사와 수술 후 병리학적 종양 크기에 대한 비교 연구김미진, 김예정, 김은혁, 김철승, 나경균, 노경희, 박영삼, 박찬균, 유은애, 최은혜, 한규담한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2020 · 제8권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)