본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography Versus Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Detecting Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: Preoperative evaluation of breast cancer using contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) has gained acceptance as a possible alternative to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI). We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of CEDM and CEMRI for chemotherapeutic response in breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: Fifty patients with invasive carcinoma who underwent both CEDM and CEMRI from November 2017 to October 2018 were included. The residual malignancy sizes after NAC were compared with the histopathological results. The diagnostic performance for detecting residual cancers was compared using Lin concordance and Pearson correlation coefficients. Results: Fifty patients were included in this analysis. The mean tumor size after NAC was 1.22 cm (range: 0–7.0) for CEDM and 1.13 cm (range: 0–5.1) for CEMRI compared with 1.89 cm (range: 0–12.0) at the final pathology measurement. The sensitivity for identifying residual lesions for CEDM and CEMRI were 62.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.6–81.2) and 66.7% (95% CI: 44.7–84.4), respectively. The positive predictive values for residual lesions were 93.8% (95% CI: 69.8–99.8) for CEDM and 88.9% (95% CI: 65.3–98.6) for CEMRI. The mean difference in CEDM was 0.668 cm, with a concordance coefficient of 0.202 and Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.231 (p=0.220). Conclusion: The diagnostic value of CEDM for detecting the residual tumor extent after NAC was comparable to that of CEMRI.

Abstract

Purpose: Preoperative evaluation of breast cancer using contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) has gained acceptance as a possible alternative to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI). We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of CEDM and CEMRI for chemotherapeutic response in breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: Fifty patients with invasive carcinoma who underwent both CEDM and CEMRI from November 2017 to October 2018 were included. The residual malignancy sizes after NAC were compared with the histopathological results. The diagnostic performance for detecting residual cancers was compared using Lin concordance and Pearson correlation coefficients. Results: Fifty patients were included in this analysis. The mean tumor size after NAC was 1.22 cm (range: 0–7.0) for CEDM and 1.13 cm (range: 0–5.1) for CEMRI compared with 1.89 cm (range: 0–12.0) at the final pathology measurement. The sensitivity for identifying residual lesions for CEDM and CEMRI were 62.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.6–81.2) and 66.7% (95% CI: 44.7–84.4), respectively. The positive predictive values for residual lesions were 93.8% (95% CI: 69.8–99.8) for CEDM and 88.9% (95% CI: 65.3–98.6) for CEMRI. The mean difference in CEDM was 0.668 cm, with a concordance coefficient of 0.202 and Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.231 (p=0.220). Conclusion: The diagnostic value of CEDM for detecting the residual tumor extent after NAC was comparable to that of CEMRI.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Lewin JM, "Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography : feasibility", Radiology, 229, pp.261~268 (2003)
  2. Fallenberg EM, "Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI : initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size", Eur Radiol, 24, pp.256~264 (2014)
  3. Dromain C, "Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography : initial clinical results", Eur Radiol, 21, pp.565~574 (2011)
  4. Bilimoria KY, "Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers", Arch Surg, 142, pp.441~447 (2007)
  5. Lee-Felker SA, "Newly diagnosed breast cancer : comparison of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and breast MR imaging in the evaluation of extent of disease", Radiology, 285, pp.389~400 (2017)
  6. Patel BK, "Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography is comparable to MRI in the assessment of residual breast cancer following neoadjuvant systemic therapy", Ann Surg Oncol, 25, pp.1350~1356 (2018)
  7. Barra FR, "Contrast-enhanced mammography(CEM)for detecting residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy : a comparison with breast magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)", Biomed Res Int, 2018, pp.8531916~ (2018)
  8. The Korean Society of Radiology, "Korean clinical practice guideline for adverse reactions to injectable iodinated contrast agent and gadolinium-based contrast agent injection for MRI", The Korean Society of Radiology, ~ (2016)
  9. Ren B, "Dual energy iodine contrast imaging with mammography and tomosynthesis", SPIE, 8668, pp.219~227 (2013)
  10. 김은영, "Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer", Journal of Breast Cancer, 21(4), pp.453~462 (2018), 한국유방암학회[DOI]
  11. American College of Radiology, "ACR BI-RADS atlas: breast imaging reporting and data system", American College of Radiology, ~ (2013)
  12. Eisenhauer EA, "New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours : revised RECIST guideline(version 1. 1)", Eur J Cancer, 45, pp.228~247 (2009)
  13. Kim EY, "Preoperative evaluation of mammographic microcalcifications after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer", Clin Radiol, 75, pp.641.e619~641.e627 (2020)[DOI]
  14. Harvey JM, "Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer", J Clin Oncol, 17, pp.1474~1481 (1999)
  15. von Minckwitz G, "Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes", J Clin Oncol, 30, pp.1796~1804 (2012)
  16. Ogston KN, "A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy : prognostic significance and survival", Breast, 12, pp.320~327 (2003)
  17. Mieog JSD, "Preoperative chemotherapy for women with operable breast cancer", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2007, pp.CD005002~ (2007)
  18. Shin HJ, "Comparison of mammography, sonography, MRI and clinical examination in patients with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy", Br J Radiol, 84, pp.612~620 (2011)
  19. Martincich L, "Monitoring response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging", Breast Cancer Res Treat, 83, pp.67~76 (2004)
  20. Lobbes MBI, "The role of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing residual disease and pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy : a systematic review", Insights Imaging, 4, pp.163~175 (2013)
  21. Hobbs MM, "Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography(CESM)and contrast enhanced MRI(CEMRI) : patient preferences and tolerance", J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 59, pp.300~305 (2015)
  22. Youn I, "Contrast enhanced digital mammography versus magnetic resonance imaging for accurate measurement of the size of breast cancer", Br J Radiol, 92, pp.20180929~ (2019)
  23. Sogani J, "Comparison of background parenchymal enhancement at contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and breast MR imaging", Radiology, 282, pp.63~73 (2017)
  24. Barra FR, "Contrast-enhanced mammography(CEM)for detecting residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy : a comparison with breast magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)", Biomed Res Int, 2018, pp.8531916~ (2018)
  25. ElSaid NAE, "Role of contrast enhanced spectral mammography in predicting pathological response of locally advanced breast cancer post neo-adjuvant chemotherapy", Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med, 48, pp.519~527 (2017)
  26. Jochelson MS, "Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography : feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma", Radiology, 266, pp.743~751 (2013)
  27. Iotti V, "Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in neoadjuvant chemotherapy monitoring : a comparison with breast magnetic resonance imaging", Breast Cancer Res, 19, pp.106~ (2017)
  28. Luczynska E, "Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography", Med Sci Monit, 21, pp.1358~1367 (2015)
  29. Wu LA, "Evaluation of the treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer using combined magnetic resonance vascular maps and apparent diffusion coefficient", J Magn Reson Imaging, 42, pp.1407~1420 (2015)
  30. Dromain C, "Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography : initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study", Breast Cancer Res, 14, pp.R94~ (2012)
  31. Kuhl CK, "MRI of breast tumors", Eur Radiol, 10, pp.46~58 (2000)
  32. Hieken TJ, "Correlating sonography, mammography, and pathology in the assessment of breast cancer size", Am J Surg, 182, pp.351~354 (2001)
  33. Cuesta Cuesta AB, "Accuracy of tumor size measurements performed by magnetic resonance, ultrasound and mammography, and their correlation with pathological size in primary breast cancer", Cir Esp(Engl Ed), 97, pp.391~396 (2019)
  34. Gruber IV, "Measurement of tumour size with mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance imaging as compared to histological tumour size in primary breast cancer", BMC Cancer, 13, pp.328~ (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

Response Evaluation to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients: Sequential Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Using Computer-Aided Detection이지은, 차은숙, Chae In Hye, Chung Jin, Han Mira, Kim Jeoung Hyun, Sung Sun Hee대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2023 · 제27권 제1호Clinical Significance and Characteristics of Newly Detected Lesions on Breast MRI During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy김진유, 김현열, 남수봉, 이지원, 주지현, 추기석, 황재연, Chankue Park, Jae-Joon Kim, Kyeyoung Lee, Kyung Jin Nam, Youn Joo Jung대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2022 · 제26권 제4호A Comparison of Residual Tumor Accuracy Prior to Re-Excision between Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography오성돈, 이정선한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2014 · 제2권 제1호선행항암화학요법을 시행한 유방암 환자에서 영상학적 액와부 병기의 정확성강상율, 안하림, 윤현조, 정성후한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2020 · 제8권 제2호Preoperative Evaluation of Non-Mass-Like Enhancement on Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Measuring Tumor Extent and Affecting Surgical Margin Status in Breast Cancer PatientsChan Heun Park, Eun Young Kim, Seon Min Park, Yong Lai Park한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2022 · 제10권 제1호The Role of Preoperative Breast MRI in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer김학희, 신희정, 차주희, 채은영, 최우정대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2025 · 제29권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)