본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

개인의 아이디어 제안과 채택에 대한 연구: LMX, TMX, 그리고 혁신지원풍토의 조절효과를 중심으로

The Study on Idea Generation and Implementation: The Moderating effect of LMX, TMX, and Support for Innovation

김민수|오원경|손건강
한국기업경영학회 (Korean Corporation Management Association)|2015.10|기업경영연구 (Korean Corporation Management Review)|제22권 제5호|pp. 67-85

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

LMXTMXSupport for InnovationIdea Generation혁신과정Innovation Process아이디어 제안아이디어 채택혁신지원풍토Idea Implementation
주제분류경영학

초록

조직 내 혁신의 중요성에도 불구하고, 아직까지 국내에서 혁신과정에 대해 다룬 연구가 부족한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 혁신과정의 두 단계인 아이디어 제안과 아이디어 채택 단계를 살펴보고자 하였다. 먼저, 개인의 아이디어 제안이 아이디어 채택에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 살펴본다. 다음으로 개인의 아이디어 제안과 채택 간의 관계에 있어 개인의 사회적 교환관계, 즉 리더와의 교환관계와 팀 구성원들과의 교환관계가 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 살펴보고, 더 나아가 팀의 혁신지원풍토의 효과까지 살펴보고자 하였다. 자료 수집은 2013년 하반기에 설문지 응답법을 통해 이루어졌고, 최종적으로 49개 팀, 228명으로부터 설문지를 회수하여 최종 통계분석에 사용하였다. 실증분석 결과, 첫째, 아이디어 제안은 아이디어 채택에 유의미한 정(+)의 관계를 갖는다. 둘째, 아이디어 제안과 아이디어 채택 간 관계에서 LMX는 유의미한 조절효과를 갖지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, TMX는 아이디어 제안과 아이디어 채택 간 관계를 조절하는 것으로 나타났다. 넷째, 팀의 혁신지원풍토 또한 개인의 아이디어 제안과 아이디어 채택 간 관계를 조절하는 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract

Innovation in organizations has long been recognized as a source of competitive advantage and is essential for prosperity and growth. Innovation is commonly characterized as a process that composed two broad stages: idea generation and idea implementation (Clegg, Unsworth, Epitropaki, & Parker, 2002; West, 2002). Idea generation, the first stage of the process, involves behaviors producing ideas regarding improving or modifying organizational products, policies, or procedures by employees in organization(Amabile, 1988). The Idea implementation which is the second stage of the process refers to the extent to which the ideas generated by employees are successfully adopted by the organization (Amabile, 1988; Clegg, Unsworth, Epitropaki, & Parker, 2002; West, 2002). Prior research in organizational behavior has focused on the production of novel and useful ideas for innovation than idea implementation in organizations. However, recent evidence suggests that the implementation of such ideas can be of great value to the organization, thus considering the idea implementation as an important process (Birkinshaw et al., 2008). Based on earlier research, there were inconsistent results the relationship between idea generation and idea implementation. Therefore, this study verifies this relationship. Although members generate a lot of ideas for organization’ innovation, all ideas doesn’t accept or implement by the organization (Choi & Chang, 2009). In the view of social-political process, the relationship with team leader and other members and support climate for innovation in organizations are crucial factor for implementing their ideas. If their ideas don’t get agreement and support from team leader and other members, the ideas would not converted into successful innovative performance. For this reason, this study examined moderating effects of LMX, TMX, and support climate for innovation between member’s idea generation and implementation. To test hypotheses, A survey was conducted to gather data from 228 members and 49 teams in domestic companies. Questionnaire consists of two version: the idea implementation for leaders and the rest variables for members separately. The result of the hypotheses about idea generation and idea implementation showed that members’ idea generation influenced idea implementation. Also there are moderation hypotheses indicated that TMX in individual level moderated the relationship between idea generation and idea implementation. But, LMX was not significant. Lastly, supportive climate for innovation in team level moderated the relationship between idea generation and idea implementation. In this study, we distinguished the concept and found a positive association between idea generation and idea implementation. Also, we verify the importance of social exchange relationship with others in innovative process. That is, we found that team member exchange and team’ climate was important for idea implementation. In these points, our research has several theoretical implications and practical implications. Team leaders should realize their role of exchange relationship among team members for innovative performance. And the support, the will, and rewards of organization for innovation have also crucial.

참고문헌 (70)

  1. 김승곤, "택배조직 본사관리자의 변혁적·거래적 리더십이 택배영업소장의 팀 교환관계(TMX) 및 조직몰입에 미치는 영향", 기업경영연구, 21(5), pp.151~174 (2014), 한국기업경영학회
  2. 박노윤, "사회적 교환과 경제적 교환 - 고용지위, 조직지원인식, 리더-부하직원의 관계, 목표지향성의 영향 -", 기업경영연구, 16(2), pp.79~107 (2009), 한국기업경영학회
  3. 손건강, "팀 내 개인의 아이디어 제안과 채택에 관한 연구 : 개인의 교환관계와 팀의 혁신지원풍토를 중심으로", 석사, 경영학과, pp.2014
  4. 오종철, "창의적 리더십이 심리적 임파워먼트와 직무만족 및 구성원의 혁신행동에 미치는 영향 -서비스기업을 중심으로-", 기업경영연구, 17(4), pp.131~148 (2010), 한국기업경영학회
  5. Aiken, L. S., "Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions" (1991), Sage
  6. Amabile, T. M., "Research in Organizational Behavior", pp.123~167 (1988), JAI Press
  7. Amabile, T. M., "Handbook of organizational creativity", pp.31~62 (2007), Erlbaum
  8. Amabile, T. M., "The Creative Environment Scales : The Work Environment Inventory", Creative Research Journal, 2, pp.231~254 (1989)
  9. Anderson, N. R., "Measuring Climate for Work Group Innovation : Development and Validation of the Team Climate Inventory", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, pp.235~258 (1998)
  10. Ashforth, B. E., "Climate Formation : Issues and Extensions", Academy of Management Review, 10(4), pp.837~847 (1985)
  11. Axtell, C. M., "Shop Floor Innovation : Facilitating the Suggestion and Implementation of Ideas", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, pp.265~285 (2000)
  12. Axtell, C. M., "Promoting Innovation : A Change Study", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, pp.509~516 (2006)
  13. Baer, M., "Putting Creativity to Work : The Iimplementation of Creative Ideas in Organizations", Academy of Management Journal, 55, pp.1102~1119 (2012)
  14. Baer, M., "When Creative Self-efficacy Benefits Individual Creativity in Tteams: The Cross-level Effects of Diversity and Expertise Location", Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (2010), Organizational Behavior Division
  15. Birkinshaw, J., "Management Innovation", Academy of Management Review, 33(4), pp.825~845 (2008)
  16. Blau, P., "Exchange and Power in Social Life" (1964), Wiley
  17. Bliese, P. D., "Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations", pp.349~381 (2000), Jossey-Bass
  18. Bryk, A. S., "Hierarchical Linear Models" (1992), Sage
  19. Chan, D., "Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models", Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, pp.234~246 (1998)
  20. Chandler, G. N., "Unraveling the Determinants and Consequences of an Innovation-Supportive Organizational Culture", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25, pp.59~76 (2000)
  21. Choi, J. N., "Innovation Implementation in the Public Sector : An Integration of Institutional and Collective Dynamics", Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), pp.245~253 (2009)
  22. Clegg, C. W., "Implicating Trust in the Innovation Process", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(4), pp.409~422 (2002)
  23. Cole, M. S., "The Workplace Social Exchange Network", Group and Organization Management, 27, pp.142~167 (2002)
  24. Da Silva, N., "Adopting Employees’ Ideas : Moderators of the Idea Generation Idea Implementation Link", Creativity Research Journal, 24, pp.134~145 (2012)
  25. Deci, E. L., "Self-Determination in a Work Organization", Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, pp.580~590 (1989)
  26. Dienesch, R. M., "Leader-Member Exchange Model of Leadership : A Critique and Further Development", Academy of Management Review, 11(3), pp.618~634 (1986)
  27. Dirks, K. T., "The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings", Organization Science, 12, pp.450~467 (2001)
  28. Dutton, J. E., "Selling Issue to Top Management", Academy of Management Review, 18, pp.397~428 (1993)
  29. Frost, P. J., "The Political Process of Innovation", Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, pp.229~295 (1991)
  30. George, J. M., "Chapter 9 : Creativity in Organizations", The Academy of Management Annals, 1, pp.439~477 (2007)
  31. Graen, G. B., "The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange and Job Design on Productivity and Satisfaction : Testing a Dual Attachment Model", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, pp.109~131 (1982)
  32. Graen, G. B., "Development of Leader-Member Exchange(LMX)Theory of Leadership over 25 Years : Applying a Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective", Leadership Quarterly, 6, pp.219~247 (1995)
  33. Green, S. G., "Advocacy, Performance, and Threshold Influences on Decisions to Terminate New Product Development", Academy of Management Journal, 46, pp.419~434 (2003)
  34. Hair, J. F., "Multivariate Data Analysis" (1998), Prentice-Hall
  35. Harris, K. J., "Easing the Strain: The Buffer Role of Supervisors in the Perceptions of Politics-Strain Relationship", Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 78, pp.337~354 (2005)
  36. Hofmann, D. A., "An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models", Journal of Management, 23, pp.723~744 (1997)
  37. Hofmann, D. A., "Centering Decisions in Hierarchical Linear Models : Implications for Research in Organizations", Journal of Management, 23, pp.723~744 (1998)
  38. James, L. R., "Estimating Within-Group Interrater Reliability with and without Responses Bias", Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, pp.85~98 (1984)
  39. James, L. R., "Rwg : A Assessment of Within-Group Interrater Agreement", Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, pp.306~309 (1993)
  40. Janssen, O., "How Fairness Perceptions Make Innovative Behavior More or Less Stressful", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), pp.201~215 (2004)
  41. Kanter, R. M., "Supporting Innovation and Venture Development in Established Companies", Journal of Business Venturing, 1, pp.47~60 (1985)
  42. Kanter, R. M., "Research in organizational behavior" (1988), JAL
  43. Klein, K. J., "Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions", pp.3~90 (2000), Jossey-Bass
  44. Liao, H., "Looking at Both Sides of the Social Exchange Coin : A Social Cognitive Perspective on the Joint Effects of Relationship Quality and Differentiation on Creativity", Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), pp.1090~1109 (2010)
  45. Liden, R. C., "Generalizability of the Vertical Dyad Linkage Model of Leadership", Academy of Management Journal, 23, pp.451~465 (1980)
  46. Liden, R. C., "Multidimensionality of Leader-Member Exchange : an Empirical Assessment Through Scale Development", Journal of Management, 24, pp.43~72 (1998)
  47. McLoughlin, I., "Innovation, Organizational Change and Technology" (1997), London Business Press
  48. Mueller, J. S., "Research on Managing Groups and Teams: Creativity in Groups" (2009), Emerald Group Publishing Limited
  49. Oldham, G. R., "Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work", Academy of Management Journal, 39, pp.607~634 (1996)
  50. Pearce, J. L., "Task Interdependence and Extra Role Behavior : A Test of the Mediating Effects of Felt Responsibility", Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), pp.838~844 (1991)
  51. Pelz, D. C., "Innovation Complexity and the Sequence of Innovating Stages", Science Communication, 3, pp.261~291 (1985)
  52. Pelz, D. C., "Autonomy, Coordination, and Stimulation in Relation to Scientific Achievement", Behavioral Science, 11, pp.89~97 (1966)
  53. Perry-Smith, J. E., "The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective", Academy of Management Review, 28, pp.89~106 (2003)
  54. Putman, V. L., "Brainstorming, Brainstorming Rules and Decision Making", The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(1), pp.29~40 (2009)
  55. Rietzschel, E. F., "Productivity Is Not Enough: A Comparison of Interactive and Nominal Brainstorming Broups on Idea Generation and Selection", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, pp.244~251 (2006)
  56. Salancik, G. R., "A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design", Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, pp.224~253 (1978)
  57. Schneider, B., "Organizational climate and culture" (1990), Jossey-Bass
  58. Scott, S. G., "Determinants of Innovative Behavior : Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace", Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp.580~607 (1994)
  59. Seers, A., "Team-Member Exchange : A New Construct for Role-Making Research", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, pp.118~135 (1989)
  60. Seers, A., "Team-Member Exchange under Team and Traditional Management", Group & Organization Management, 20, pp.18~38 (1995)
  61. Shalley, C. E., "The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity : Where Should We Go From Here", Journal of Management, 30, pp.933~958 (2004)
  62. Unsworth, K., "Employee Innovation: Generation, Implementation or Both?", International Work Psychology Conference, University of Sheffeld, Institute of Work Psychology (1998)
  63. Van de Ven, A. H., "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation", Management Science, 32(2), pp.590~607 (1986)
  64. Van de Ven, A H., "Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies" (1989), Harper & Row
  65. West, M. A., "Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies", pp.309~333 (1990), Wiley
  66. West, M. A., "Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups", Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, pp.355~387 (2002)
  67. Wolfe, R., "Organizational Innovation : Review, Critique and Suggested Research Ddirections", Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), pp.405~431 (1994)
  68. Woodman, R. W., "Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity", Academy of Management Review, 18, pp.293~321 (1993)
  69. Yuan, F., "Innovative Behavior in the Workplace : The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expectations", Academy of Management Journal, 53, pp.323~342 (2010)
  70. Zhou, J., "When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice", Academy of Management Journal, 44, pp.682~696 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

침묵분위기, LMX, 혁신행동의 관계에 대한 실증연구이광희, 이병진, 장은혜, 엔흐어트겅 떠르즈거터브한국산업경영시스템학회 · 한국산업경영시스템학회지2014 · 제37권 제3호사회적 교환관계가 조직구성원의 혁신적 업무행동에 미치는 영향: 직원몰입과 발언행동의 매개효과를 중심으로윤혜림한국인력개발학회 · HRD연구2025 · 제27권 제3호개인혁신행동의 선행요인과 POS의 매개효과에 관한 연구이도형, 이승희한국인적자원관리학회 · 인적자원관리연구2012 · 제19권 제2호리더-구성원 교환관계와 팀-구성원 교환관계가 대상별 제언행동에 미치는 영향강경희, 최동원미래산업연구소 · 산업연구2025 · 제49권 제3호리더-구성원교환관계(LMX)가 공공연구조직 구성원의 창의성과 혁신행동에 미치는 영향김병근, 김윤선산업개발연구소 · 산업혁신연구2020 · 제36권 제1호팀 구성원의 아이디어 창출과 실행 간의 관계 - 침묵풍토의 조절효과 -김정수, 김정식한국인적자원관리학회 · 인적자원관리연구2018 · 제25권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)

환노출에 대한 파생상품 사용이 기업성과 및 신용등급에 미친 영향백재승, 김수봉pp. 1-22관광수요의 구조적 변화와 변동성에 대한 연구이경희, 김경수pp. 23-46신용등급 전망의 정보가치와 신용개선효과김범, 김진산pp. 47-66BSC의 활용목적에 따른 가중치 설계김주은pp. 87-105개인, 직무, 관계 측면에서의 결정요인이 직무 크래프팅에 미치는 주효과 및 상호작용효과신인용pp. 107-125
원문 보기