본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지역축제 체험활동에서의 체험영역 측정척도 개발

Development of Measurement Scale of Experience Realms in Local Festivals

1

조회

0

다운로드

29

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

본 연구는 지역축제 체험활동 참가자들이 실제 체험활동에 참가하면서 어떤 것들이 느끼고 있는지(체험영역) 그리고 그것들을 어떻게 측정할 수 있는 지를 살펴보고자 한 것으로, 연구기간은 2004년 3월부터 2005년 5월까지 총 14개월간 이었다. 이는 체험영영 속성 항목의 수집, 분류, 정제, 그리고 체험영역 측정도구의 신뢰성 및 타당성 검증을 통하여 이루어졌다. 체험영역 속성 항목의 수집을 위해서는 문헌조사와 예비조사가 수행되었으며, 체험영역 속성 항목의 분류를 위해서는 전문가 패널조사와 번한 및 설문 항목 구성이 실행되었다. 그리고 체험영역 속성 항목의 정제를 위해서는 2차 예비조사와 사전조사가 행하여졌다. 이러한 과정을 거쳐서 도출된 5개 구성영역 17항목은 본 조사를 통하여 그 신뢰성과 타당성을 검증받았다. 그 결과 최종적으로 지역축제 체험영역 측정척도로 4개 구성영역(엔터테인먼트, 교육, 몰입, 유대감)과 18개 항목이 도출되었다. 이렇게 개발된 지역축제 체험영역 측정척도는 향후 지역축제 체험활동 평가 도구로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 사료된다

Abstract

This study is to develop the measurement scale of experience realms in the local festivals. For this purpose, collection, classification, purification and validification of items for construction concept for experience realms are performed. To collect items, the researcher reviewed the previous studies and conducted the open-ended survey. As a result, 38 items for six construction concepts (entertainment, education, aesthetics, escape, social bonding, and apprehension) for experience have been drawn. To classify items for construction concept for experience realms, three experts majored in Leisure and Tourism Studies performed the content validity test. When there were similar meanings and expressions for the construction concept for experience, the experts had the representative item left and the rest of them deleted. Through these processes, 8 items for the construction concept for experience have been deleted and 30 items have been pulled out for Cronbach’s alpha test and exploratory factor analysis in pretest. For purification items for construction concept, pretest was conducted on the subject of undergraduate students of K and S University. In total, 151 data were collected and 12 out of them were discarded because of incomplete information, leaving 139 usable one. The collected data were analyzed using a statistical software package SPSS 10.1. To verify the reliability on 30 items for six construction concepts (entertainment, education, aesthetics, escape, social bonding, and apprehension) of on-site experience, we established three criteria: mean and corrected item-total correlation of each item and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of each construction concept. As a result of reliability analysis for 30 items for 6 construction concepts (entertainment, education, escape, aesthetics, social bonding, apprehension), 18 items for 5 construction concepts (entertainment, education, escape, aesthetics, social bonding) were extracted as on-site measurement scale, deleting 1 construction concept and 12 items. To confirm these 18 items for 5 construction concepts as on-site measurement scale, main survey was conducted at Hwaseong Temporary Palace on 14th in November, 2005. From main survey, 150 data were collected. Three data of them were regarded as useless ones because of incomplete information. To verify measurement scale, reliability analysis and exploratory factor analysis were performed using data from main survey. Specially, exploratory factor analysis was conducted to confirm 5 construct dimensionalities such as entertainment, education, escape, aesthetics, and social bonding. As a result, this study found out that there were four construct dimensionalities for experience entertainment with 4 items, education with 5 items, aesthetics with 6 items, and social bonding with 3 items. This research, however, should be applied to the other experience activities by following research because it has focused only on local festival.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 김현호, "지역축제의 현황과 합리화 방안", 지방재정과 지방세, 2, pp.35~48 (2010), 한국지방재정공제회
  2. 성영신, "여가 경험의 심리적 본질:재미란 무엇인가?", 소비자학연구, 7(2), pp.35~57 (1996), 한국소비자학회
  3. 손선미, "체험지향성과 관광축제이벤트의 프로그램,물리적 요소,방문의도의 관계", 이벤트컨벤션연구, 3(1), pp.1~23 (2007), 한국이벤트컨벤션학회
  4. 송운강, "관광웹사이트와 비관광웹사이트의 플로우 경험구조 비교", 관광학연구, 26(1), pp.215~230 (2002), 한국관광학회
  5. 여호근, "축제 참가자의 축제평가와 체험의사의 관계연구", 컨벤션연구, 6(3), pp.153~168 (2006)
  6. 오정근, "축제의 체험속성과 환경단서가 방문객 만족에 미치는 영향: 체험형축제와 관람형축제의 비교분석을 중심으로", 관광학연구, 32(4), pp.301~324 (2008), 한국관광학회
  7. 오정학, "인지", 감정 통합에 의한 주제공원 만족모형 연구, 성균관대학교 대학원, 1999
  8. 이범재, "축제방문객의 체험동기에 따른 시장세분화 연구 - 2009 화천산천어축제를 중심으로 -", 관광연구, 24(6), pp.1~25 (2010), 대한관광경영학회
  9. 이영진, "공연예술축제 체험 소비행위의 유형화: 춘천 마임축제를 대상으로", 관광학연구, 31(3), pp.245~267 (2007), 한국관광학회
  10. 체험관광상품 개발 활성화 방안, "한국관광연구원", ~ (1999)
  11. 한숙영, "Pine과 Gilmore의 체험영역 모델에 관한 검증 :한산모시축제 체험활동 참가자 만족을 중심으로", 관광학연구, 29(2), pp.131~148 (2005), 한국관광학회
  12. 하동현, "테마파크에서의 체험요소에 관한 연구 - Pine과 Gilmore의 체험경제이론(Experience Economy)을 중심으로 -", 한국사진지리학회지, 19(1), pp.37~47 (2009), 한국사진지리학회
  13. 황윤용, "축제에서 체험요소가 참여자감정반응과 애호행동에 미치는 영향", 산업경제연구, 21(5), pp.2113~2131 (2008), 한국산업경제학회
  14. Allison, M. T., "Women, Work, and Flow. in: Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness", pp.118~137 (1988), Cambridge University Press
  15. Churchill, G. A., "A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Construct", Journal of Marketing Research, 16, pp.64~73 (1979)
  16. Csikszentmihalyi, M., "Beyond Boredom and Anxiety" (1975), Jossey-Bass
  17. Csikszentmihalyi, M., "The future of flow. in: Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness", pp.364~383 (1988), Cambridge University Press
  18. Holbrook, M. B., "The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun", Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), pp.132~140 (1982)
  19. Hull, R. B. Ⅳ, "Nature- based Recreation, Mood Change, and Stress Reduction", Leisure Sciences, 17(1), pp.1~14 (1995)
  20. Hull, R. B. Ⅳ, "Ebb and Flow of Brief Leisure experiences", Leisure Sciences, 18(4), pp.299~314 (1996)
  21. Lee, Y., "The Complex and Dynamic Nature of Leisure Experience", Journal of Leisure Research, 26(3), pp.195~262 (1994)
  22. Lipscombe, N., "The Relevance of the Peak Experience to Continued Skydiving Participation: a Qualitative Approach to Assessing Motivations", Leisure Studies, 19(3), pp.267~288 (1999)
  23. Mannell, R. C., "Psychological Nature of Leisure and Tourism Experience", Annals of Tourism Research, 14(3), pp.314~331 (1987)
  24. Maslow, A. H., "Religions, Values, and Peak-Experiences" (1970), Penguin Compass
  25. Massimini, F., "The Systematic Assessment of Flow in Daily Experience. in: Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness", pp.266~287 (1988), Cambridge University Press
  26. O’Sullivan, E. L., "Experience Marketing" (1998), Venture Publishing, Inc.
  27. Pine, B. J.Ⅱ, "Welcome to the experience economy", Harvard Business Review, 76(4), pp.97~105 (1998)
  28. Pine, B. J.Ⅱ, "The Experience Economy: Work is Theatre and Every Business a Stage" (1999), HBS Press
  29. Ryan, C., "The Tourist Experience" (2002), Continuum
  30. Sato, I., "Bosozoku: Flow in Japanese Motorcycle Gangs. in: Optimal experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness", pp.92~117 (1988), Cambridge University Press
  31. Um, S., "The Roles of Perceived Inhibitors and Perceived Facilitator in the Pleasure Travel Destination Choice Process", 박사, pp.1987
  32. Well, A. J., "Self-Esteem and Optimal Experience. in: Optimal experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness", pp.327~341 (1988), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)