본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대학생 프로젝트 팀의 리더십 네트워크 특성이 팀 몰입과 팀 성과에 미치는 영향: 팀 수준 분석

The Effects of Leadership Network Characteristic in University Student Project Teams on Team Commitment and Team Performance: Team-Level Analysis

양동민|심덕섭
한국기업경영학회 (Korean Corporation Management Association)|2016.04|기업경영연구 (Korean Corporation Management Review)|제23권 제2호|pp. 175-194|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.21052/KCMR.2016.23.2.09

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

중심성Centrality사회네트워크 분석Social Network Analysis밀도Density팀 성과Team PerformanceTeam Commitment팀 몰입
주제분류경영학

초록

본 연구는 대학생 프로젝트 팀의 리더십 네트워크 특성이 팀 몰입과 팀 성과에 미치는 영향을 검증하고자 하였다. 이는 리더십 연구에 있어 전통적인 접근법이라 할 수 있는 수직적 리더십과 최근 환경의 변화에 부응하기 위해 학계와 실무에서 많은 관심을 받고 있는 공유리더십을 함께 고려하여 팀 기반 환경에 적합한 리더십을 규명하기 위한 의미 있는 연구라 할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 팀 내 리더십 영향력 패턴을 보다 잘 파악하기 위해 사회네트워크 접근법을 활용하였다. 기존 선행연구들을 토대로 본 연구에서는 리더십 네트워크의 중심성이 팀 몰입과 팀 성과에 정(+)의 영향을 미칠 것이라는 가설과 함께 리더십 네트워크의 밀도 역시 팀 몰입과 팀 성과에 정(+)의 영향을 미칠 것이라는 가설을 설정하였다. 가설 검증을 위해 81개 대학생 프로젝트 팀의 374명의 학생들을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 본 연구의 가설검증 결과 리더십 네트워크의 중심성과 밀도 모두 팀 몰입과 팀 성과에 정(+)의 유의한 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 중심성과 밀도 모두 팀 내에서 팀 몰입과 팀 성과를 증진시키는 요인으로 작용하고 있음을 의미한다. 나아가 팀 내에서 높은 중심성과 높은 밀도의 특성을 갖는 리더십 네트워크는 함께 공존할 수 있으며 중심성과 밀도 각각의 긍정적인 영향력이 상호 보완적인 역할을 수행하면서 팀 몰입과 팀 성과를 설명하는 요인들로 작용함을 의미한다. 연구결과를 토대로 연구의 한계 및 향후 연구방향을 제시하였다.

Abstract

Leadership is considered crucial for enabling team effectiveness, but most existing research on team leadership has focused narrowly on the influence of an individual team leader, thus largely neglecting leadership provided by team members. Current forms of teamwork that emphasize knowledge-based work rely on employees who have high levels of expertise and seek autonomy in how they apply their knowledge and skills and therefore desire greater opportunity to shape and participate in the leadership functions for their teams. Utilizing social network approach, we investigated density and centrality of leadership in team and their influence on team commitment and team performance, in order to better capture these overall patterns of influence. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of leadership network characteristics on team commitment and team performance. Based on prior literature, this study derives following hypotheses. H1. Leadership network centrality will be positively related to team commitment. H2. Leadership network centrality will be positively related to team performance. H3. Leadership network density will be positively related to team commitment. H4. Leadership network density will be positively related to team performance. To test the proposed hypotheses in our study, we collected data via a survey with a sample of 81 university student teams, comprising 374 respondents (on average 4.38 per team). Centrality and density were measured by 3 items from Kent & Moss(1990). The measurement of centrality and density can be measured by tie type among team members(Balkundi & Harrison, 2006). Team commitment was measured by scale from Van der Vegt, Emans & Van de Vliert(2000) on a 4-item scale. Team performance was measured by 11-item scale from Henderson & Lee(1992), Hoegl & Gemuenden(2001), Gemuenden & Lechler(1997). Items were rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 7. The major findings are as follows: First, centrality of leadership network was positively associated with team commitment and team performance. Mangers should therefore ensure that each team has a clear and shared sense of direction, prepares working plans, prioritize and allocate team tasks and promote and establish norms of participations and workload sharing. Second, density of leadership network was also positively associated with team commitment and team performance. The findings suggest that organizations should help develop strong shared leadership patterns within their teams to bolster effectiveness. Organizations can promote shared leadership by setting expectations and encouraging members when teams initially form to view themselves and their fellow team members as leaders and to engage in shred, mutual leadership. Using a network-based measure of centrality and density, which better captures the patterns of mutual influence inherent in the construct, the findings provide several important theoretical and practical implications regarding leadership network characteristics in the team context and future research directions are discussed.

참고문헌 (76)

  1. 김진욱, "공유리더십이 종업원 인게이지먼트에 미치는 영향 - 회복탄력성의 조절효과를 중심으로", 생산성논집, 27(4), pp.89~121 (2013), 한국생산성학회
  2. 박동호, "변혁적 리더십이 팀･개인 효과성에 미치는 영향에 관한 다수준 분석: 팀･개인 창의성의 매개 효과를 중심으로", 기업경영연구, 22(6), pp.127~149 (2015), 한국기업경영학회
  3. 성상현, "다양성이 프로젝트 팀의 성과에 미치는 영향", 인사조직연구, 15(2), pp.39~70 (2007), 한국인사조직학회
  4. 양동민, "프로젝트 팀 내 공유리더십(Shared Leadership)이 팀 효능감과 팀 몰입에 미치는 영향 -과업조정 및 업무분담의 매개효과 검증 -", 기업경영연구, 19(2), pp.127~147 (2012), 한국기업경영학회[DOI]
  5. 양동민, "프로젝트팀 내 리더출현의 선행요인에 관한 연구", HRD연구, 12(1), pp.23~42 (2010), 한국인력개발학회
  6. 이광희, "공유 리더십이 팀 성과에 미치는 영향 - 특전사 팀을 중심으로 -", 인적자원관리연구, 20(3), pp.145~166 (2013), 한국인적자원관리학회
  7. 임서영, "팀장의 리더십이 구성원의 경력몰입과 이직의도에 미치는 영향 -감성지능의 조절효과-", 기업경영연구, 17(3), pp.1~22 (2010), 한국기업경영학회
  8. 정예지, "팀 내 공유 리더십이 팀 효능감과 팀 혁신 성향에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 대한경영학회지, 27(5), pp.635~655 (2014), 대한경영학회
  9. Adler, P. S., "Social Capital : Prospects for a New Concept", Academy of Management Review, 27, pp.17~40 (2002)
  10. Allison, P. D., "Measure of Inequality", American Sociological Review, 43, pp.865~880 (1978)
  11. Avolio, B. J., "Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams:Team Leadership", pp.173~209 (1996), JAI Press
  12. Avolio, B. J., "Shared Leadership:Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership", pp.143~172 (2003), Sage
  13. Balkundi, P., "Ties, Leaders., and Time in Teams : Strong Inference about Network Structure's Effects on Team Viability and Performance", Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), pp.49~68 (2006)
  14. Bantel, K. A., "Top Management and Innovations in Banking : Does the Composition of the Top Team Make a Difference?", Strategy Management Journal, 10, pp.107~125 (1989)
  15. Barsness, Z. I., "Motivation and Opportunity : The Role of Remote Work, Demographic Dissimilarity., and Social Network Centrality in Impression Management", Academy of Management Journal, 48, pp.401~419 (2005)
  16. Bass, B. M., "Bass and Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership" (1990), Free Press
  17. Bergman, J. Z., "The Shared Leadership Process in Decision Making Team", The Journal of Social Psychology, 152, pp.17~42 (2012)
  18. Blau, P. M., "Inequality and Heterogeneity" (1977), Free Press
  19. Boies, K., "Shared Leadership and Team Performance in a Business Strategy Simulation", Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, pp.195~202 (2010)
  20. Bryant, T. A., "Encyclopedia of Leadership 1" (2004), Sage
  21. Carson, J. B., "Shared Leadership in Teams : An Investigation of Antecedent Conditions and Performance", Academy of Management Journal, 50, pp.1217~1234 (2007)
  22. Conger, J. A. ., "Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership", pp.285~304 (2003), Sage
  23. Cox, T., "Effects of Ethnic Group Cultural Differences on Cooperative and Competitive Behavior on a Group Task", Academy of Management Journal, 4, pp.827~847 (1991)
  24. Day, D. V., "Leadership Development : A Review in Context", The Leadership Quarterly, 11, pp.581~613 (2000)
  25. Day, D. V., "A Multilevel, Identity-based Approach to Leadership Development", Human Resource Management Review, 17, pp.360~373 (2007)
  26. Day, D. V., "Leadership Capacity in Teams", Leadership Quarterly, 15, pp.857~880 (2004)
  27. DeNisi, A. S., "Managing Knowledge for Sustained Competitive Advantage", pp.3~33 (2003), Jossey-Bass
  28. Dumaine, B., "The Trouble with Teams", Fortune, 130, pp.86~92 (1994)
  29. Dyer, W. G., "Team Building : Issues and Alternatives" (1977), Addison-Wesley
  30. Ensley, M. D., "The Importance of Vertical and Shared Leadership within New Venture Top Management Teams : Implications for the Performance of Startups", The Leadership Quarterly, 17, pp.217~231 (2006)
  31. Finkelstein, S., "Strategic Leadership : Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams,and Boards" (2009), Oxford University Press
  32. Gemuenden, H. G., "Success Factors of Project Management: The Critical Few: An Empirical Investigation", Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, pp.375~377 (1997)
  33. Gibb, C. A., "Handbook of Social Psychology, 2", pp.877~917 (1954), Addison-Wesley
  34. Hackman, J. R., "Advances in Experimental Social Psychology", pp.47~99 (1975), Academic Press
  35. Henderson, J. C., "Managing I", S Design Tteams : A Control Theories Perspective, 1992, pp.38, 757~777
  36. Hoch, J. E., "Is the Most Effective Team Leadership Shared? The Impact of Shared Leadership, Age Diversity and Coordination on Team Performance", Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, pp.105~116 (2010)
  37. Hock, J. E., "Shared Leadership and Innovation : The Role of Vertical Leadership and Employee Integrity", Journal of Business and Psychology, 28, pp.159~174 (2013)
  38. Hock, J. E., "Vertical and Shared Leadership Processes: Exploring Team Leadership Dynamics", Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, pp.1607~1612 (2014)
  39. Hock, J. E., "Shared Leadership in Enterprise Resource Planning and Human Resource Management System Implementation", Human Resource Management Review, 23, pp.114~125 (2013)
  40. Hoegl, M., "Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects : a Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence", Organization Science, 12, pp.435~449 (2001)
  41. Hogg, M. A., "A Social Identity Theory of Leadership", Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, pp.184~200 (2001)
  42. Hogg, M. A., "The Social Identity Theory of Leadership : Theoretical Origins, Research Findings., and Conceptual Developments", European Review of Social Psychology, 23, pp.258~304 (2012)
  43. James, L. R., "Estimating Within-group Interrater Reliability with and Without Response Bias", Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, pp.85~98 (1984)
  44. Katz, D. ., "The Social Psychology of Organizations" (1978), Willey
  45. Katzenbbach J. R., "The Wisdom of Teams" (1993), Harvard Business School Press
  46. Kent, R. L., "Self-monitoring As a Predictor of Leader Emergence", Psychological Reports, 66, pp.875~881 (1990)
  47. Kozlowski, S. W. J., "Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology:Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12", pp.333~375 (2003), Wiley
  48. Manz, C. C., "Leading Workers to Lead Themselves : The External Leadership of Self-management Work Teams", Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, pp.106~129 (1987)
  49. Manz, C. C., "Business Without Bosses : How Self-managing Teams are Building High-performance Companies" (1993), Wiley
  50. Marks, M. A., "A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes", Academy of Management Review, 26, pp.356~376 (2001)
  51. Marsden, P. V., "Annual Review of Sociology, 16", pp.435~463 (1990), Annual Reviews
  52. Mayo, M., "Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership", pp.193~214 (2003), Sage
  53. Mehra, A., "Distributed Leadership in Teams : The Network of Leadership Perceptions and Team Performance", The Leadership Quarterly, 17, pp.232~245 (2006)
  54. Morgeson, F. P., "Leadership in Teams : A Functional Approach to Understanding Leadership Structures and Processes", Journal of Management, 36, pp.5~39 (2010)
  55. Mowday, R., "Reflections on the Study and Relevance of Organizational Commitment", Human Resource Management Review, 8, pp.387~401 (1999)
  56. Nahapiet, J., "Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage", Academy of Management Review, 23, pp.242~266 (1998)
  57. Otte, E., "Social Network Analysis : A Powerful Strategy, Also For the Information Sciences", Journal of Information Science, 6, pp.441~453 (2002)
  58. Pearce, C. L., "The Determinants of Change Management Team (CMT) Effectiveness: A Longitudinal Investigation", 박사, pp.1997
  59. Pearce, C. L., "The Importance of Self-and Shared Leadership in Knowledge Work", Organizational Dynamics, 34, pp.130~140 (2005)
  60. Pearce, C. L., "Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, 7", pp.115~139 (2000), JAI
  61. Pearce, C. L., "The Relative Influence of Vertical vs. Shared Leadership on the Longitudinal Effectiveness of Change Management Teams", Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, pp.172~197 (2002)
  62. Pearce, C. L., "Improving Leadership in Nonprofit Organizations", pp.180~203 (2004), Jossey-Bass
  63. Rhoades, L., "Perceived Organizational Support : A Review of the Literature", Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), pp.698~714 (2002)
  64. Ryder, N. B., "The Cohort as a Concept in the Study of Social Change", American Sociological Review, 30, pp.843~861 (1965)
  65. Scheinheider, B., "When Twelve Geads Are Better Than One:Implementing a Shared Leadership Concept in a Police Agency", Academy Management Best Conference Paper (2006)
  66. Scott, J., "Social Network Analysis : A handbook" (2000), Sage
  67. Shapcott, K. M., "Member Diversity and Cohension and Performance in Walking Groups", Small Group Research, 37, pp.701~720 (2006)
  68. Sivasubraminiam, N., "A Longitudinal Model of the Effects of Team Leadership and Group Potency on Group Performance", Group and Organization Management, 27, pp.66~96 (2002)
  69. Tesluk, P. E., "Overcoming Roadblocks to Effectiveness : Incorporating Management of Performance Barriers into Models of Work Group Effectiveness", Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, pp.200~217 (1999)
  70. Van de Ven, A. H., "Measuring and Assessing Organizations" (1980), John Wiley and Sons, Inc
  71. Van der Vegt, G. S., "Affective Responses to Intragroup Interdependence and Job Complexity", Journal of Management, 26, pp.633~655 (2000)
  72. Vroom, V. H. ., "Leadership and Decision Making" (1973), University of Pittsburgh Press
  73. Wang, D., "A Meta-analysis of Shared Leadership and Team Effectiveness", Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), pp.181~198 (2014)
  74. Wasserman, S., "Social Network Analysis : Methods and Applications" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  75. Wolff, S. B., "Emotional Intelligence as the Basis of Leadership Emergence in Self-managing Teams", The Leadership Quarterly, 13, pp.505~522 (2002)
  76. Yukl, C. A., "Leadership in Organizations" (1998), Prentice Hall

관련 논문AI추천

관계적 리더십과 팀 구성원의 성과: 리더-구성원 교환관계(LMX)와 사회적 네트워크 관점의 통합오홍석, 이기현, 정명호한국산업및조직심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직2008 · 제21권 제4호프로젝트 팀 내 공유리더십(Shared Leadership)이 팀 효능감과 팀 몰입에 미치는 영향 -과업조정 및 업무분담의 매개효과 검증 -노현재, 심덕섭, 양동민한국기업경영학회 · 기업경영연구2012 · 제19권 제2호공유 리더십의 선행요인과 그 효과성에 관한 연구김문주, 정예지한국기업경영학회 · 기업경영연구2016 · 제23권 제6호진성리더십이 구성원의 프로젝트 성과에 미치는 영향노태우, 서정은, 탁진규한국디지털정책학회 · 디지털융복합연구2019 · 제17권 제6호팀활동에 기반한 협동학습에서 변혁적 리더십, LMX(leader-member exchange), 리더신뢰와 팀몰입고수일, 한주희한국직업교육학회 · 직업교육연구2009 · 제28권 제3호분산 리더십과 활력관계가 조직시민행동, 팀 몰입 및 팀 성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구: 팀 회복탄력성과 팀 효능감의 매개효과를 중심으로김용근한국기업경영학회 · 기업경영연구2016 · 제23권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

경영자소유지분이 부채만기와 대리인비용에 미치는 영향최영목pp. 1-22기업의 사회적 책임이 기업에 대한 신뢰 및 평판과 고객충성도에 미치는 영향: 소비자의 윤리적 의식의 조절효과를 중심으로곽교, 권영철pp. 23-42제조업체의 마케팅정책 및 대리점 담당 영업사원의 활동이 대리점주의 만족도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구박찬욱, 김동현, 조아라pp. 43-71한국 기업의 기업지배구조와 사회공헌활동신형덕, 이남령, 박지현pp. 73-91고용 형태와 정서적 몰입의 관계: 조직 공정성 지각의 조절 효과최은정, 권기욱pp. 93-115
원문 보기