진보적 민족문학론의 민중 개념 형성론 보론
Re-thinking about a Formation of the Conception of the Progressive Min-jung(民衆)
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The problem of this Study is that how is Min-jung imaged. We know that Min-jung is the oppressed differed the oppressing into halves, and reformer stand against the oppressing. But this study verify Min-jung is progressive elites's ideological imaged-thing, and far criticize or reconsider Min-jung ideologies of Nation-literature-theory(民族文學論). The conception of ideological Min-jung is founded by Beak, Lak-cheong, Kim, ji-ha, and Shin, Kyeong-rim. In frist, conception of the citizen used in [Citizen-literature-theory] written by Beak, Lak-cheong is only his imaged-thing differed from general conception. Originally the conception of citizen is public that is being pursued reformer's ideal in the France Revolution. By the way, Beak, Lak-cheong think citizen is universal concept and reformers in Korea history. In Second, Kim, ji-ha image that Min-jung is the oppressed or nation founded on suppression relation in [Satire, or Suicide]. He classify various social being in the oppressed and the oppressing. And he rebear Min-jung in nation. In third, Shin, Kyeong-rim show Min-jung's image of literature pointed on korea modern literature, and consider Min-jung's image of literature on the product reflected elite's progressive consciousness in [Literation and Min-jung]. So his conception of the Min-jung is the oppressed founded in Kim, ji-ha's conception of the Min-jung, and is imaged reformer stuck to reform wills. The unconscious and absolute supposition on Min-jung necessity in reconsideration. That Min-jung is the oppressed and reformer is a thinking proposed by 1960～80's progressive elites. They fight against the center power in Min-jung's name. In conclusion, Min-jung is a conception relative, not absolute.
Abstract
The problem of this Study is that how is Min-jung imaged. We know that Min-jung is the oppressed differed the oppressing into halves, and reformer stand against the oppressing. But this study verify Min-jung is progressive elites's ideological imaged-thing, and far criticize or reconsider Min-jung ideologies of Nation-literature-theory(民族文學論). The conception of ideological Min-jung is founded by Beak, Lak-cheong, Kim, ji-ha, and Shin, Kyeong-rim. In frist, conception of the citizen used in [Citizen-literature-theory] written by Beak, Lak-cheong is only his imaged-thing differed from general conception. Originally the conception of citizen is public that is being pursued reformer's ideal in the France Revolution. By the way, Beak, Lak-cheong think citizen is universal concept and reformers in Korea history. In Second, Kim, ji-ha image that Min-jung is the oppressed or nation founded on suppression relation in [Satire, or Suicide]. He classify various social being in the oppressed and the oppressing. And he rebear Min-jung in nation. In third, Shin, Kyeong-rim show Min-jung's image of literature pointed on korea modern literature, and consider Min-jung's image of literature on the product reflected elite's progressive consciousness in [Literation and Min-jung]. So his conception of the Min-jung is the oppressed founded in Kim, ji-ha's conception of the Min-jung, and is imaged reformer stuck to reform wills. The unconscious and absolute supposition on Min-jung necessity in reconsideration. That Min-jung is the oppressed and reformer is a thinking proposed by 1960～80's progressive elites. They fight against the center power in Min-jung's name. In conclusion, Min-jung is a conception relative, not absolute.
참고문헌 (45)
- 김지하, "민족의 노래 민중의 노래" (1984), 동광출판사
- 백낙청, "시민문학론 In: 민족문학과 세계문학Ⅰ" (1978), 창작과비평사
- 신경림, "문학과 민중" (1977), 민음사
- "동아일보(사설) 1924. 2. 6. 참조", ~
- "상황", (봄) (1972)
- "신동아 1980년 7월, 참조", ~
- "월간문학 1970. 10. 참조", ~
- "월간문학 1972. 10. 참조", ~
- 강정구, "진보적 민족문학론에서 민중 개념의 형성 과정 연구", 비교문화연구, 11(2)
- 강정구, "진보적 민족문학론의 민중시관 재고", 국제어문, 40
- 구중서, "상황의 현상적 인식", 상황, (봄), pp.33~ (1972)
- 구중서, "한국 리얼리즘 문학의 형성 In: 문학적 현실의 전개", pp.46~ (2006), 창비
- 김명인, "지식인 문학의 위기와 새로운 민족문학의 구상 In: 전환기의 민족문학" (1987), 풀빛
- 김병걸, "19세기 리얼리즘 문학", 상황, (50), pp.76~
- 김지하, "오적" (1993), 솔
- 김진하, "민중론에 관한 실증적 접근", 석사, 치외교학과, pp.1989
- 박현채, "민족, 민중 그리고 문학", pp.72~73 (1985), 지양사
- 박현채, "민족경제론" (1978), 한길사
- 백낙청, "민족문학 개념의 정립을 위해 In: 민족문학과 세계문학 Ⅰ", pp.131~ (1978), 창작과비평
- 백낙청, "발문", pp.111~ (1975), 창작과비평사
- 백낙청, "새로운 창작과 비평의 자세 In: 창작과 비평 1966겨울호, 민족문학과 세계문학 Ⅰ", pp.356~ (1978), 창작과비평사
- 백낙청, "시인과 현실(좌담)", 신동아, pp.302~ (1973)
- 진기, "민족해방문학의 성격과 임무", 녹두꽃, 2 (1989)
- 서광선, "민중신학의 이해", 한국기독교협의회
- 성민엽, "민중문학의 논리 In: 민중문학론" (1984), 문학과지성사
- 송건호, "민중의 개념과 그 실체-좌담 In: 월간 대화 1976. 11월호, 민중" (1984), 문학과지성사
- 신경림, "삶의 진실과 시적 진실", pp.289~32 (1987), 전예원
- 신경림, "민요기행2", pp.211~ (1989), 한길사
- 안병무, "역사와 민중 In: 안병무전집6" (1993), 한길사
- 염무웅, "리얼리즘의 심화와 확대 In: 우리문학의 논쟁사", pp.456~ (1985), 어문각
- 염무웅, "민족문학, 이 어둠 속의 행진", 월간중앙 (1972)
- 염무웅, "민족문학, 이 어둠 속의 행진", 월간중앙, pp.109~ (1972)
- 윤영천, "예술가의 사회적 책무 In: 서정적 진실과 시의 힘", pp.179~ (2002), 창작과비평사
- 이시영, "70년대의 시", 동서문학, (겨울), pp.180~ (1990)
- 이진영, "지식인과 역사의식 In: 청맥", pp.324~ (1966)
- 임중빈, "반사회참여의 모순 In:『대한일보』1967. 10. 17", ~ (1967)
- 임헌영, "민족문학에의 길 In: 예술계" (1970)
- 임헌영, "민족문학에의 길 In: 예술계", pp.44~ (1970), 예술계
- 장백일, "문학혁신", 한양, pp.130~131 (1964)
- 장상철, "1970년대 '민중' 개념의 재등장", 경제와 사회, (74), pp.114~138 (2007), 비판사회학회
- 정창렬, "한국에서 민중사학의 성립·전개과정 In: 한국민중론의 현단계", pp.9~10 (1989), 돌베개
- 조정환, "민주주의 민족문학론에 대한 자기비판과 ‘노동해방문학론’의 제창 In: 노동해방문학창간호" (1989)
- 채광석, "설 자리, 갈 자리 In: 민중적 민족문학론" (1989), 풀빛
- Anderson, B., "상상의 공동체", pp.11~76 (2002), 나남출판
- Foucasult, M., "담론의 질서" (1998)