감정평가에서 적정가격과 현저한 차이의 판단기준

Abstract

Appraisal work exists between persons who have different interests and comes with various responsibility to the result. Especially civil liability follows the abstract basis to the law which is ‘remarkable difference in appraisal fair market value’. Therefore, the problem happens when there are several fair market value those come from appraisal work with the same stuff in the short period. It is the problem that remarkable differences among appraisal value rather than fair market value. It is a strong tendency to regard it as primary difference that exceed more than 110% to the lowest appraisal value by the ‘land compensation act’. It is regulated the difference ratio from 130% to 110%. Appraisal business circle reacts against too heavy responsibility and responds technically, so that it causes the problem to cope with determining people’s right of property insincerely. It is needed immediately to establish rational primary criterion to the “remarkable differences among appraisal values”. This study suggests graded measures with different use zones to clarify the meaning of ‘remarkable difference’. This study meta-analyzed other studies about appraisal difference and classify the use zones according to price level. It also extends legal principles and chooses way to assign maximum ratio(110%-130%) of difference which is ‘defacto standards’. It needs clear definition first about using the use zone for it’s practical application.