본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

K-IFRS 부동산 공정가치 평가의 문제점과 대응방안

Problems and Alternatives of Real Estate Fair Value in K-IFRS

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Recently, Fair Value Measurement has been issued. It is very important for success of IFRS Adoption to valuate Fair Value objectively. Therefore, there is a very urgent need to investigate the differences between Appraisal theory and Accounting measurement. If there are any problems to practice Fair Value Measurement, We have to find alternatives for that. The purposes of this research is to suggest alternatives for the problems which may occur when applying Fair Value Measurement of K-IFRS to real estate valuation. Ultimately, it is to achieve a good international reputation. Fair value measurement of real estate for a financial accounting report has a very low level in systems and contents in comparison to Appraisal Businesses. Therefore, the role of appraisers is more important than before. The findings are as follows : First, it is necessary to define the meanings of fair value and market value in order to avoid the confusion in concepts. Second, appraisers need to ensure the objectivity and professionalism of fair value valuation. Third, a variety of valuation approaches and international collaboration is required to build the reliability of fair value valuation. Fourth, it will be helpful to issue fair value valuation manuals and show materials to the public to improve the insufficient disclosure of financial accounting reports.

Abstract

Recently, Fair Value Measurement has been issued. It is very important for success of IFRS Adoption to valuate Fair Value objectively. Therefore, there is a very urgent need to investigate the differences between Appraisal theory and Accounting measurement. If there are any problems to practice Fair Value Measurement, We have to find alternatives for that. The purposes of this research is to suggest alternatives for the problems which may occur when applying Fair Value Measurement of K-IFRS to real estate valuation. Ultimately, it is to achieve a good international reputation. Fair value measurement of real estate for a financial accounting report has a very low level in systems and contents in comparison to Appraisal Businesses. Therefore, the role of appraisers is more important than before. The findings are as follows : First, it is necessary to define the meanings of fair value and market value in order to avoid the confusion in concepts. Second, appraisers need to ensure the objectivity and professionalism of fair value valuation. Third, a variety of valuation approaches and international collaboration is required to build the reliability of fair value valuation. Fourth, it will be helpful to issue fair value valuation manuals and show materials to the public to improve the insufficient disclosure of financial accounting reports.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 방경식, "부동산학 총론" (2011), 부연사
  2. 아칼야, 비랄 V, "김경환 등 공역,미국발 글로벌 금융위기의 진단과 처방" (2009), 교보문고
  3. 안정근, "부동산평가이론, 제4판" (2006), 법문사
  4. 이장규, "IFRS,회계국경이 사라진다" (2008), 교보문고
  5. 퍼트남, 힐러리, "사실과 가치의 이분법을 넘어서", 서광사
  6. 한국감정평가협회, "부동산용어대사전" (2006), 부연사
  7. 홍성수, "읽기만 해도 술술 이해되는 국제회계기준" (2010), 새로운 제안
  8. Appraisal Institute, "The Appraisal of Real Estate 13th" (2008), The Appraisal Institute
  9. Appraisal Institute, "The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal 5th" (2010), The Appraisal Institute
  10. Friedman, Jack P., "Dictionary of Real Estate Terms 7th" (2008), Barron’s Educational Series
  11. Zyla, Mark L, "Fair Value Measurements" (2010), John Wiley & Sons
  12. 이영호, "한국채택국제회계기준 제정에 따른 감정평가업계의 참여방안에 관한 연구" (2008), 한국부동산연구원
  13. 공정가치 평가지침 및 공정가치 평가기관의 품질제고 방안, "이창우", 금융감독원, ~ (2008)
  14. 한국채택국제회계기준 적용의 실무적 문제점 및 대책, "임석식", 한국회계기준원, ~ (2008)
  15. 국제회계기준 도입에 따른 「부감법」 개정안 쟁점 검토, "허강무", 한국부동산연구원, ~ (2010)
  16. 정은희, "부동산업 전문직 종사자의 직업윤리에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2008
  17. 경응수, "국제회계기준 도입과 유형자산의 감정평가", 감정평가학논집, 7(1), pp.47~71 (2008), 한국감정평가학회
  18. 고승의, "국제회계기준(IFRS)의 공정가치 회계와 가치평가 전문가제도에 대한 전망", 부동산연구, 19(2), pp.191~216 (2009), 한국부동산연구원
  19. 김문태, "국제회계기준 도입에 따른 자산의 공정가치 평가에 관한 고찰", 한국비즈니스리뷰, 2(1), pp.175~195 (2009), 조선대학교 지식경영연구원
  20. 김용민, "不動産 鑑定評價의 原理", 부동산학보, 2(23), pp.71~87 (2004), 한국부동산학회
  21. 방경식, "감정평가 업계의 환경변화와 대응방안", 감정평가학 논집, 통권 : 3, pp.117~144 (2004), 한국감정평가학회
  22. 백원선, "국제회계기준 : 공정가치 평가", 상장협연구, (58), pp.36~58 (2008), 한국상장회사협의회
  23. 연규홍, "자산 공정가치 평가의 K-GAAP와 K-IFRS 비교 검토에 관한 연구", 세무회계연구, (26), pp.87~119 (2010), 한국세무회계학회
  24. 윤동건, "IFRS도입과 자산재평가의 문제점", 부동산연구, 19(2), pp.217~235 (2009), 한국부동산연구원
  25. 이상신, "국제회계기준 도입·적용의 법적 쟁점-상법·세법·외감법을 중심으로-", 세무와회계저널, 9(4), pp.171~193 (2008), 한국세무학회
  26. 이태정, "국제회계기준 도입이 자산평가에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 국제회계연구, (27), pp.297~310 (2009), 한국국제회계학회
  27. 장지경, "국제회계기준 도입에 따른 공정가치 평가 확대적용의 전망과 시사점", 국제회계연구, (33), pp.323~353 (2010), 한국국제회계학회
  28. 조군제, "국제회계기준의 도입에 따른 문제점과 개선방안", 국제회계연구, (32), pp.289~310 (2010), 한국국제회계학회
  29. Johnson, I. Richard, "Incorporating Highest and Best Use into Accounting Standards Expands Opportunities for Appraisers", The Appraisal Journal, (Spring), pp.150~158 (2010)
  30. King, Alfred M, "Determining Fair Value", pp.27~32 (2009), Strategic Finance
  31. 금융감독원, "알기 쉬운 국제회계기준", ~ (2010)
  32. 이창로, "실무수습교재(IFRS와 공정가치평가)" (2011), 한국감정평가협회
  33. 한국회계기준원, "국제회계기준 도입 로드맵 발표 자료", ~ (2007)
  34. 한국회계기준원, "EEG(Emerging Economies Group)회의자료", ~ (2011)
  35. "금융감독원 전자공시시스템"[URL]
  36. "법률지식정보시스템"[URL]
  37. "국제회계기준위원회"[URL]
  38. "한국회계기준원"[URL]
  39. "미국 통일전문평가실무기준"[URL]
  40. IFRS 13, "Fair Value Measurement", ~ (2011)
  41. "IFRS 기업회계기준서 제1016호", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)