한용운의 탈문학주의, 혹은 문학을 상상하는 방식

Abstract

Currently, within and without it is a critical era in literature. Han, Yong-woon illuminated here, reveals a case where literature has grown within the skepticism of literature. Internally, continuously questioning about literature itself is not essential part of han, Yong-woon's literariness but at least such actions occupies the part which cannot be overlooked in the literary actions. Then, recognizing the literary crisis faced in Han, Yong-woon's literature could be offered suggestions to us who are living in a critical moment of literature? The purpose of this thesis is to analyze Han, Yong-woon's these intention toward literature. Although engaging in literature, he consistently tried to go beyond literature and considered the exterior of literature. Such intention is called ex-literaturism in this paper. Han, Yong woon's will to treat literature as a relative object rather than an absolute idea is one of the most important disputed issues that can be clearly and consistently confirmed in his not many comments on literature. Han, Yong woon's these literary wills carry can also be verified by his internalized intentions within his grammar of thinking. Here is the seriousness of the problems in Han, Yong woon's ex-literaturism. Directly, Han, Yong woon's expression of ex-literaturism is anti-aestheticism and anti-art for art's sake. Of course, there is some missing point about Han, Yong-woon's ex-literturism. From him, it is hard to find groping methodology about the way that literature exists actively in normal life. However, is it possible to write a lyric poem in any fascism era as its era's form or as a form of pain? Literature annexes all kinds of none literature elements which as yet never become a literature to its territory. Undoubtedly, the era of fascism is not the exception to such literature.