본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

용서와 구원의 문제에 접근하는 두 가지 태도 - 「행복원의 예수」· 「벌레이야기」를 중심으로

The two means of access to the problem of forgiveness and salvation - with 「HangBokWonUi YeSu」 and 「Beole IyaGi」 -

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

I studied the two means of access to the problem of forgiveness and salvation with 「HangBokWonUi YeSu」 and 「Beole IyaGi」. In 「HangBokWonUi YeSu」, the writer took note of the circumstance which the forgiveness and the salvation from sin are easily ruled in the members who have identical consciousness. He also pointed out the concern which means that the absolute forgiveness of God may be rather productive of crime without a true attitude of atonement. He tells us that people feel doubt about being easily forgiven and are conscious of the fact that the true forgiveness and the salvation are not given by others but by myself. In 「Beole IyaGi」, the writer took note of a change of mind of one woman who heard about that the criminal was already forgiven by God and found a peace of mind although she would like to forgive him who killed her baby. The woman couldn't accept God who forgave him earlier than me and finally ended her life by committing suicide. Two works are handling it the subject matter of Christian forgiveness and salvation superficially. However, they approach the general life problem of the men keeping some distance from the religion in-depth. We can also find that in 「Beole IyaGi」 published 20 years later than in 「HangBokWonUi YeSu」, the awareness of God was further developed. While the writer studied the problem of forgiveness and salvation with atheistic point of view in 「HangBokWonUi YeSu」, he come at it from theistic angle in the way that he showed the undersized human image in the sight of God in 「Beole IyaGi」. Although the writer mentioned the problem of forgiveness and salvation using Christian imagination, he tries to examine not at the doctrinaire attitude but at the human side. The thing which he emphasizes is that true forgiveness and salvation without true self-reflection and self-awareness do not exist and it depends only on the individual true will.

Abstract

I studied the two means of access to the problem of forgiveness and salvation with 「HangBokWonUi YeSu」 and 「Beole IyaGi」. In 「HangBokWonUi YeSu」, the writer took note of the circumstance which the forgiveness and the salvation from sin are easily ruled in the members who have identical consciousness. He also pointed out the concern which means that the absolute forgiveness of God may be rather productive of crime without a true attitude of atonement. He tells us that people feel doubt about being easily forgiven and are conscious of the fact that the true forgiveness and the salvation are not given by others but by myself. In 「Beole IyaGi」, the writer took note of a change of mind of one woman who heard about that the criminal was already forgiven by God and found a peace of mind although she would like to forgive him who killed her baby. The woman couldn't accept God who forgave him earlier than me and finally ended her life by committing suicide. Two works are handling it the subject matter of Christian forgiveness and salvation superficially. However, they approach the general life problem of the men keeping some distance from the religion in-depth. We can also find that in 「Beole IyaGi」 published 20 years later than in 「HangBokWonUi YeSu」, the awareness of God was further developed. While the writer studied the problem of forgiveness and salvation with atheistic point of view in 「HangBokWonUi YeSu」, he come at it from theistic angle in the way that he showed the undersized human image in the sight of God in 「Beole IyaGi」. Although the writer mentioned the problem of forgiveness and salvation using Christian imagination, he tries to examine not at the doctrinaire attitude but at the human side. The thing which he emphasizes is that true forgiveness and salvation without true self-reflection and self-awareness do not exist and it depends only on the individual true will.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 이청준, "행복원의 예수. in: 별을 보여드립니다" (2001), 열림원
  2. 이청준, "벌레이야기. in: 별을 보여드립니다" (2002), 열림원
  3. 이청준, "키 작은 자유인-가위 밑 그림의 음화와 양화5. in: 가위 밑 그림의 음화와 양화" (1999), 열림원
  4. 이청준, "田英泰 대담, 「나의 文學, 나의 小說作法」", 현대문학 (1984)
  5. 이청준, "복수와 용서의 변증법-김치수와의 대화. in: 말없음표의 속말들" (1986), 나남
  6. 이청준, "동아일보, 1989. 11. 13", ~ (1989)
  7. "『성경전서』 개역개정판" (2001), 대한성서공회
  8. 강민석, "소설과 영화의 서사 구조 비교 연구 : 이청준의『벌레이야기』와 이창동의 『밀양』을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2008
  9. 金光洙, "용서 연구의 동향과 과제", 교육심리연구, 16(2), pp.113~131 (2002), 한국교육심리학회
  10. 김영봉, "숨어계신 하나님- 영화 “밀양”을 통해 성찰한 용서, 사랑 그리고 구원" (2008), 한국기독학생회 출판부
  11. 김영숙, "이청준 소설의 기독교적 상상력 연구", 박사, pp.2008
  12. 김주연, "이청준의 종교적 상상력", 본질과 현상, (14) (2008)
  13. 김주희, "이청준의 {벌레이야기}가 '증언'하는 용서의 도리", 한국문예비평연구, 14(14), pp.127~155 (2004), 한국현대문예비평학회
  14. 김희선, "용서와 인간실존의 문제에 대한 두 태도 - 단편소설 「벌레이야기」와 영화 <밀양>", 문학과 종교, 14(2), pp.163~194 (2009), 한국문학과종교학회
  15. 민순의, "논문 : 영화 《밀양》이 제기하는 인간학적 성찰 -악의 현실과 구원의 방향성을 중심으로-", 종교와 문화, (13), pp.211~242 (2007), 종교문제연구소
  16. 박희일, "이청준 소설의 주체 구현 방식 연구", 석사, pp.2000
  17. 송태현, "소설 「벌레 이야기」에서 영화 <밀양>으로", 세계문학비교연구, (25), pp.327~352 (2008), 세계문학비교학회
  18. 오생근, "삶과 내면적 아픔의 글쓰기. in: 별을 보여드립니다" (2001), 열림원
  19. 유광웅, "개신교에 있어서의 죄고백과 용서", 組織神學論叢, 2 (1996), 한국조직신학회
  20. 이대규, "이청준 소설「벌레이야기」의 상상력 연구", 현대소설연구, 15 (1996), 현대소설학회
  21. 이수형, "이청준 소설에 나타난 교환 관계 양상 연구", 박사, pp.2007
  22. 이유토, "이청준의 기독교소설 연구", 박사, pp.2007
  23. 이호선, "용서와 화해의 성서적 모델", 한국기독상담학회지, 8 (2004), 한국기독교 상담 치료학회
  24. 장안수, "反抗으로서의 自殺 -李淸俊 단편 <벌레 이야기>의 실존주의문학적 성격", 한국문학논총, 34, pp.21~615 (2003), 한국문학회
  25. 전지은, "이청준 소설의 매체 변용양상연구- 『서편제』,『축제』,『벌레이야기』를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2008
  26. 홍영택, "하나님의 용서와 사람의 용서", 한국기독교신학논총, (31), pp.605~642 (2004), 한국기독교학회
  27. "국립국어원 표준국어대사전"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)