본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

이문구 소설에 나타난 토포필리아의 수사학-심리적 실향의식을 중심으로

A Study on the Rhetoric of Topophilia in Lee, Moon-gu's novels

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This paper aims to investigate the rhetorical characteristics of topophilia in Lee, Moon-gu's works. Indeed, the hometown, especially the countryside and the rural, is represented in terms of harmony, beauty, stability, tradition, peace, innocence and virtue. However, the hometown has no fixed images, meanings or representations since it undergoes a rapid process of social and cultural changes, fundamentally as a consequence of modernization. Lee, Moon-gu has come to understand his hometown (Gwanchon) as the site of lack and unease since 1960-70. Lee, Moon-gu experiences anxiety when he is confronted by the hometown which is destroyed in the course of modernization, and has consciousness of psychological homelessness (placelessness). We should note here that the act of Lee's novel writing is a defence against consciousness of psychological homelessness. This article argues that in this respect Lee's novel writing involves topophilia. The term ‘topophilia’ is usually used in the context of the affective bond between people and place or setting. From my viewpoint, however, topophilia means a defence which veils the lack in significant place. In other words, I emphasize the protective function of topophilia; topophilia is based on the fantasy of oneness with significant place. Lee Moon-gu's works may thus be distinguished by the particular way in which they use rhetorical strategies to veil the lack in the hometown. For example, Lee's works use (1) the rhetoric of structure foregrounding the disclosure and (2) the rhetoric of double-narration. These rhetorical strategies constitute the most original feature of topophilia in Lee Moon-gu's works. After all, Lee Moon-gu's novel writing as topophilia enables him to sustain his desire for the hometown, Gwanchon.

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the rhetorical characteristics of topophilia in Lee, Moon-gu's works. Indeed, the hometown, especially the countryside and the rural, is represented in terms of harmony, beauty, stability, tradition, peace, innocence and virtue. However, the hometown has no fixed images, meanings or representations since it undergoes a rapid process of social and cultural changes, fundamentally as a consequence of modernization. Lee, Moon-gu has come to understand his hometown (Gwanchon) as the site of lack and unease since 1960-70. Lee, Moon-gu experiences anxiety when he is confronted by the hometown which is destroyed in the course of modernization, and has consciousness of psychological homelessness (placelessness). We should note here that the act of Lee's novel writing is a defence against consciousness of psychological homelessness. This article argues that in this respect Lee's novel writing involves topophilia. The term ‘topophilia’ is usually used in the context of the affective bond between people and place or setting. From my viewpoint, however, topophilia means a defence which veils the lack in significant place. In other words, I emphasize the protective function of topophilia; topophilia is based on the fantasy of oneness with significant place. Lee Moon-gu's works may thus be distinguished by the particular way in which they use rhetorical strategies to veil the lack in the hometown. For example, Lee's works use (1) the rhetoric of structure foregrounding the disclosure and (2) the rhetoric of double-narration. These rhetorical strategies constitute the most original feature of topophilia in Lee Moon-gu's works. After all, Lee Moon-gu's novel writing as topophilia enables him to sustain his desire for the hometown, Gwanchon.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 이문구, "관촌수필" (2002), 문학과지성사
  2. 이문구, "우리 동네" (2008), 민음사
  3. 이문구, "내 몸은 너무 오래 서 있거나 걸어왔다" (2006), 랜덤하우스중앙
  4. 이문구, "마음의 얼룩" (2005), 랜덤하우스중앙
  5. 구자황, "관촌 가는 길 ―이문구 연구 논문집" (2006), 랜덤하우스코리아
  6. 권영민, "개인적 경험과 서사의 방법 , 관촌수필 해설" (2005), 랜덤하우스중앙
  7. 권택영, "잉여 쾌락의 시대" (2003), 문예출판사
  8. 김성진, "생태문제와 인문학적 상상력" (1999), 나남출판
  9. 김정숙, "소수적 언어와 타자의 윤리학― 이문구의 우리 동네를 중심으로", 비평문학, 21(21), pp.167~187 (2005), 한국비평문학회
  10. 유승현, "이문구 소설의 서술 특성 연구", 우리어문연구, 27(27), pp.419~444 (2006), 우리어문학회
  11. 이문구, "아는 동네하고 모르는 동네", 문예중앙, (여름) (1993)
  12. 이봉범, "풍속사로 재현한 1980년대 농촌과 문화적 보수주의,In 산 너머 남촌 해설" (2005), 랜덤하우스중앙
  13. 장일구, "도시의 서사적 공간 형상", 현대소설연구, (35), pp.71~88 (2007), 한국현대소설학회
  14. 최시한, "이문구 소설의 서술 구조 ― 연작소설을 중심으로-", 한국문학이론과 비평, 12(3), pp.57~84 (2008), 한국문학이론과비평학회
  15. 홍준기, "자끄 라깡, 프로이트로의 복귀: 프로이트・라깡 정신분석학 ―이론과 임상,라깡의 재탄생" (2002), 창작과비평사
  16. 나리타 류이치, "고향’이라는 이야기 , 한일비교문화세미나" (2007), 동국대학교출판부
  17. 유영소, "삐딱하게 보기" (1995), 시각과 언어
  18. 슬라보예 지젝, "그들은 자기가 하는 일을 알지 못하나이다" (2007), 인간사랑
  19. 에드워드 렐프, "장소와 장소상실" (2005), 논형
  20. 제라르 주네트, "서사 담론" (1992), 교보문고
  21. S. 리몬-케넌, "소설의 시학" (1996), 문학과지성사
  22. 지그문트 프로이트, "정신분석학의 근본 개념 ―프로이트전집 11" (2010), 열린책들
  23. Yi-Fu Tuan, "Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values" (1974), New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)