본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

북한의 문학 장르 오체르크 연구

A Study on the Ocherk, Literary Genre of North Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

22

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This study presents an investigation of Ocherk, which was a new literary genre in the literary history of North Korea and very significant in that it revealed the relationships between the early day literature and politics of the nation. After 1952 when it was first introduced in an essay by Lee Hyo-un, it remained contradictory in terms of contents and identity and confusing in the aspect of terms until 1961 when it started to be called nonfiction literature in the critical writing by Choi Il-ryong. The introduction and the changing process of Ocherk were closed related to the North Korean regime's external and political relations. In other words, Ocherk hit the perfect timing being needed by the regime for identity establishment for the nation. For Ocherk, they usually adopt an actual story on which they write an narrative. There are Ocherks based on travel, portrait, event, comment on current events, and war. According to Lee Hyo-un, Ocherk is "a literary genre of autonomy and pride and has the specific elements of a comment on current events and academic research as well as the iconic elements unlike other kinds of comments on current events." Ocherk is "the tactical and fire-eating literary genre" and "the active kind of weapon in the history of Russian literature used by progressive writers in their lives aggressively and constantly." Under the belief that "it promotes the formation of a new socialist human being to agitate and propagate the accomplishment," the goal of Ocherk is "popular communication" and the success of an Ocherk work depends on "the right choice of a theme and its social and political implication." Although Ocherk was imported from the former Soviet Union, it's hard to ignore its relations to the traditional prosaic and descriptive, explanatory literature of North Korea. Ocherk survived the self-criticism that swept over the entire literary world of North Korea, which was supposed to impugn 'the trends of documentation and schemes" in the literary history. In particular, its relationships with the political arguments show the process of paradigm shifts in the literary genre hegemony and reflects the very political feature that demonstrates the influential control of the former Soviet Union over North Korea. Ongoing study on Ocherk will provide the chances to understand the North Korean literature more objectively and deeply.

Abstract

This study presents an investigation of Ocherk, which was a new literary genre in the literary history of North Korea and very significant in that it revealed the relationships between the early day literature and politics of the nation. After 1952 when it was first introduced in an essay by Lee Hyo-un, it remained contradictory in terms of contents and identity and confusing in the aspect of terms until 1961 when it started to be called nonfiction literature in the critical writing by Choi Il-ryong. The introduction and the changing process of Ocherk were closed related to the North Korean regime's external and political relations. In other words, Ocherk hit the perfect timing being needed by the regime for identity establishment for the nation. For Ocherk, they usually adopt an actual story on which they write an narrative. There are Ocherks based on travel, portrait, event, comment on current events, and war. According to Lee Hyo-un, Ocherk is "a literary genre of autonomy and pride and has the specific elements of a comment on current events and academic research as well as the iconic elements unlike other kinds of comments on current events." Ocherk is "the tactical and fire-eating literary genre" and "the active kind of weapon in the history of Russian literature used by progressive writers in their lives aggressively and constantly." Under the belief that "it promotes the formation of a new socialist human being to agitate and propagate the accomplishment," the goal of Ocherk is "popular communication" and the success of an Ocherk work depends on "the right choice of a theme and its social and political implication." Although Ocherk was imported from the former Soviet Union, it's hard to ignore its relations to the traditional prosaic and descriptive, explanatory literature of North Korea. Ocherk survived the self-criticism that swept over the entire literary world of North Korea, which was supposed to impugn 'the trends of documentation and schemes" in the literary history. In particular, its relationships with the political arguments show the process of paradigm shifts in the literary genre hegemony and reflects the very political feature that demonstrates the influential control of the former Soviet Union over North Korea. Ongoing study on Ocherk will provide the chances to understand the North Korean literature more objectively and deeply.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. "『북한의 문학』" (1989), 을유문화사
  2. "김기도 편저 『정치선전과 심리전략』" (1989)
  3. "중국당대문학사조사연구" (2001), 서울대학교 출판부
  4. "비판 커뮤니케이션" (2000), 커뮤니케이션 북스
  5. "현대정치와 커뮤니케이션" (1999), 커뮤니케이션 북스
  6. "북한의 맑스-레닌주의와 주체사상 비교연구" (2002), 통일연구원
  7. "『북한의 현대문학Ⅱ』" (1990)
  8. "해방기 북한 정치체제와 문학", 23집 (2003), 한국언어문화학회
  9. "『북한의 현대문학Ⅰ』" (1990)
  10. "현대 중국의 리얼리즘 이론" (1997), 창작과 비평사
  11. "커뮤니케이션 사상사" (2001), 커뮤니케이션 북스
  12. "『사회주의 개혁과 한반도』" (1990), 학술단체협의회
  13. "정치커뮤니케이션의 이해" (2001), 한울
  14. "일리야 에렌부르끄 외", 김학수 외역 『문학과 이데올로기-현대 소련의 문학이론』, 1990., ~[DOI]
  15. "일리야 에렌부르끄 외", 김학수 외역 『문학과 이데올로기-현대 소련의 문학이론』, 1990., ~[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)