본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

中日鉄鋼産業における質的貿易競争力の分析

The Study on the Qualitative Trade Competitiveness in Chinese Steel Industry in Trade with Japan

한기조
한국일본근대학회 (The Japanese Modern Association Of Korea)|2018.02|일본근대학연구 (The Japanese Modern Association of Korea)|제59호|pp. 457-478|DOI 10.16979/jmak..59.201802.457

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Steel Industrytrade specialization index質的貿易競争力鉄鋼産業貿易特化係数顕示比較優位指数市場比較優位指数revealed comparative advantage indexmarket comparative advantage indexqualitative trade competitiveness

초록

本稿は、中国鉄鋼産業の日本との貿易において質的な競争力の変化をみるために、2000年から2014年までを研究期間として一般的な貿易競争力の分析と伴って産業内貿易の分析を行った。分析の結果を纏めると次のようになる。第一に、中国鉄鋼産業は日本との貿易において競争力の強いその他鉄鋼製品を除いて板類、棒形鋼、素材類など競争力が弱いと測定された。特に素材類の競争力が弱いと算出された。しかし日本に対する競争力が弱いというものの、素材類を除いてほかの品目はすべてそのほどが改善の傾向にあるのは確である。第二に、比較劣位に置かれている素材類と板類を除いてその他鉄鋼製品と棒形鋼類は依然として比較優位を維持している。第三に、日本との貿易における質的な貿易競争力をみるために、産業内貿易の分析を行ったが、素材類は主に水平的産業内貿易が行われ、VIITLが縮小しVIIThが拡大したので質的貿易競争力が改善された。板類は優位品質の輸出が多く行われ、またVIITLが縮小しHIITが拡大したので質的貿易競争力が改善された。棒形鋼類とその他鉄鋼製品は劣位品質の貿易比重が高く、質的な競争力の改善も見られなかった。

Abstract

This paper examines the qualitative trade competitiveness by based on an intra-industry trade including general trade competitiveness in the Chinese steel industry in trade with Japan during the period of 2000-2014. First, Chinese steel industry appears to be weak such as steel plates, bar & section steels, steel materials, etc except competitive ‘other steel products’ in trade with Japan. Especially, it shows that competitiveness of steel materials appears to be weak. However, despite the fact that the competitiveness toward Japan is weak, it is certain that all other items except steel materials are tend to improve. Second, Other steel products and bar & section steels have still maintained the comparative advantage, except for steel materials and steel plates placed on the comparative disadvantage. Third, As an intra-industry trade is analyzed in order to evaluate the qualitative trade competitiveness in trade with Japan, China has done a horizontal intra-industry trade mainly in steel materials’ trade with Japan, and since a VIITL has been decreased but a VIITH has been expanded, the qualitative trade competitiveness has been improved in steel materials. It has been exported not only low quality items, but also high quality products in steel plates’ trade, and since a VIITL has been decreased but a HIIT has been expanded, the qualitative competitiveness has been improved in steel plates. And bar & section steels and other steel products were found to have a very high proportion of a low quality items in export to Japan, and there was no improvement in the qualitative competitiveness.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 김진욱, "한국？중국？일본의 철강산업 경쟁력 변화에 관한 연구", 국제통상연구, 11(1), pp.1~24 (2006), 한국국제통상학회
  2. 김태기, "한국과 동아시아 국가 간 수평적 수직적 산업내 무역과 FDI에 관한 연구", East Asian Economic Review, 11(1), pp.27~56 (2007), 대외경제정책연구원[DOI]
  3. 신현곤, "한·중·일 철강 수출경쟁력 비교분석과 시사점", POSRI경제경영연구, 4(1), pp.5~28 (2004)
  4. 이준엽, "한ㆍ중ㆍ일 산업내무역구조 분석을 통한 동북아 국제분업체계 연구", 한국경제연구, 10, pp.209~226 (2003), 한국경제연구학회
  5. 임혜준, "한국 철강산업의 대일본 및 대중국 경쟁력 분석", 무역학회지, 32(1), pp.263~282 (2007), 한국무역학회
  6. 한기조, "한국 철강산업의 대중국 질적 무역경쟁력 연구", 동북아경제연구, 29(3), pp.33~58 (2017), 한국동북아경제학회
  7. 한기조, "韓国鉄鋼産業の対日質的貿易競争力に関する研究", 일본근대학연구, (54), pp.485~508 (2016), 한국일본근대학회[DOI]
  8. 한기조, "한국 철강산업의 對중 및 對일 경쟁력에 관한 연구 －対일본 경쟁력을 중심으로－", 동북아경제연구, 23(2), pp.81~110 (2011), 한국동북아경제학회
  9. 한기조, "중국 철강산업의 對한국 및 對일본 경쟁력 분석", Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 10(1), pp.379~397 (2008), 한국자료분석학회
  10. 한기조, "中韓日 鐵鋼産業의 競合度 分析", 일본근대학연구, (19), pp.305~336 (2008), 한국일본근대학회[DOI]
  11. 이홍배, "한국 소재부품산업의 경쟁력 및 산업내무역 분석", 한일경상논집, 71, pp.95~119 (2016), 한일경상학회
  12. 한기조, "韓国鉄鋼産業の対日競争力分析", 한일경상논집, 42, pp.141~162 (2009), 한일경상학회
  13. 한기조, "韓国鉄鋼産業の対日貿易赤字問題", 한일경상논집, 61, pp.29~54 (2013), 한일경상학회
  14. 한기조, "韓國 鐵鋼産業의 對中 및 對日 競爭力에 關한 硏究－對中國 競爭力을 中心으로－", 한일경상논집, 50, pp.187~214 (2011), 한일경상학회
  15. Aquino, A., "Intra-Industry Trade and Inter-Industry Specialization as Concurrent Sources of International Trade in Manufactures", Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 114(2), pp.275~296 (1978)
  16. Balassa, B., "Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage", Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 33, pp.99~123 (1965)
  17. Flam, H., "Vertical Product Differentiation and North-South Trade", American Economic Review, 76, pp.810~822 (1987)
  18. Fontagne, L., "Intra-Industry Trade : Methodological Issues Reconsidered", CEPII document de travail no, 97, 1997
  19. Grubel, H. G., "Intra-Industry Trade" (1975), The MaCmillan Press, Ltd
  20. Greenaway, D., "Country-Specific Factors and the Pattern of Horizontal and Vertical Intra-Industry Trade in the UK", Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 130(1), pp.77~100 (1994)
  21. Greenaway, D., "Trade Imbalance Effects in the Measurement of Intra-Industry Trade", Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 117(4), pp.756~762 (1983)
  22. Greenaway, D., "Intra-Industry Trade : Curent Perspectives and Unsolved Issues", Review of World Economics, 123(1), pp.39~57 (1987)
  23. DENET.HURLEY, "HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL INTRA-INDUSTRY TRADE: THE CASE OF ASEAN TRADE IN MANUFACTURES", International Economic Journal, 17(4), pp.1~14 (2003), 한국국제경제학회
  24. Kol, J., "Intra-Industry Trade: Empirical and Methodological Aspects" (1983)
  25. Kol, J., "Corrections for trade imbalance : A survey", Review of World Economics, 125(4), pp.703~717 (1989)
  26. "UN COMTRADE"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

韓国鉄鋼産業の対日質的貿易競争力に関する研究한기조한국일본근대학회 · 일본근대학연구2016 · 제54호中國 鐵鋼産業의 對 韓國 産業內貿易 分析유준, 한기조대한중국학회 · 중국학2012 · 제42호中国自動車部品産業の対日質的貿易競争力の研究김영근, 한기조한국일본근대학회 · 일본근대학연구2019 · 제64호한⋅중⋅일 철강 교역구조 및 수출 경쟁력 분석남대엽, 최영훈한국중국문화학회 · 중국학논총2014 · 제43호한국？중국？일본의 철강산업 경쟁력 변화에 관한 연구김진욱, 서영석한국국제통상학회 · 국제통상연구2006 · 제11권 제1호Analysis of Competitiveness in Steel Distribution Industry between China and JapanJae-Sung Lee한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2016 · 제14권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)

世･近代における中国語の接尾辞「∼家」の受容と意味用法나공수pp. 7-42韓國語와 日本語의 一字 漢字語에 관한 考察신민철pp. 43-56「~어 죽겠다」に関する一考察‒日本語との対応関係を中心に‒이충규pp. 57-76使役句硏究小考‒英･中･韓･日 心理動詞 對照를 中心으로‒이영희pp. 77-94「さて」와 「ところで」의 의미적 기능 차이에 대하여 ‒BCCWJ와 CSJ에 의한 분석 예‒신은혜pp. 95-114
원문 보기