최재서의 모더니즘 규정에 대한 비판적 고찰

Abstract

We find the ultimate answer for the modernism of the 1930s, recent studies in the genius of the artist or the existential psychoanalysis In addition, formal and abstract scheme or artifice to explore the phase center can be accounted came. These epistemological obstacles modernist literary, historical, research rise to the ideological dimension that acts as a critical limit can be eventually In that sense, the future of modernism research ideas, or while associated with the ideology of various areas explored to identify the direction of scientific logic to explain the holistic worldview of the writer or the inner landscape of a delicate process of change move. In addition, Kim Gee Rim of poetics 30s modernism research studies, illuminated from different angles, or their work of writers such as Park Tae-Won more than that paragraph at the time was able to become objective in the logic of modernism-realism debate centered "wings" with a focus on research are many, but the debate on the finesse attention Choe Jae-Seo study the - "riverside scenery" on the dispute very minor situation. Park Tae-Won more than two novels 1936 Choe Jae-Seo's criticism about 'wings' and 'riverside landscape' modernism-realism debate, as well known, 'deepening' of realism, the novel over Park Tae - won's novel evaluated the Zoom of realism. Dealt faithfully depicts the exterior world of the artist, the work and the joys and sorrows of populace living around Cheonggyecheon if the 'wings' excellent analysis of the artist's inner world works. Creation of these techniques to describe the objective subjectivity of human nature, even cinematic techniques, namely, the presence of the camera was reminiscent Noticed by the target to zero and the depiction of the author's objective observations of tricks 'camera vision' a cinematic technique and correlated to objectively describe the attitude he insisted. But 'riverside landscape 'and 'wings' of Choe Jae-Seo was a framework for the analysis of literary works from the nutrients are. Formal analysis framework called the attitude of writers, and the framework of moral content analysis are separated. Attitudes undermine the aesthetic value of the works, in the sense that the separation and analysis of the format and contents of a literary work is the problem more than anything a single, unified framework of two analytical framework to configure it to do that the value of the literary work critical theory does not correctly reveal Analysis typically work when a consistent aesthetic attitude to criticism critics to the standards required, flexible attitude as the critic from time to time in a timely manner the framework of the analysis must be able to Transfiguration, and more suitable for the analysis of individual works part are not suitable able to distinguish between the portion of the line should know. Because literary criticism ultimately abstract theory, unless analytical framework to be able to show the best qualities of individual works.