본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

에도시대 ‘민’의 정치적 각성과 그 역설

The Political Evolution of 'People' and Its Paradox in Edo Period of Japan

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류철학

초록

This paper aims to analyse the meaning of intellectual history which the movement of transformation or deconstruction of Neo-confucianism, as a political evolution of 'people' and the ideological struggle about it, is happened since the beginning of the study Neo-confucianism between the people of city in Edo period of Japan. First, in order to understand the reason why the political evolution of 'people' and the ideological struggle about it happened in Edo period, I emphasize it was important that there was the accidental combination of special conditions in politics, economy, international relation and the acceptance of Neo-confucianism having the principle everyone is equal by nature at that time. Second, the famous thinkers of the movement of transformation or deconstruction of Neo-confucianism, Jinsai Ito, Sorai Ogyu and Norinaga Motoori, are positioned to the typical example of the political evolution of 'people' and the ideological struggle about it. Jinsai Ito, through the reconstruction of confucianism with the critical approach about Neo-confucianism, produced the discourse of the political evolution of 'people'. Sorai Ogyu, in opposition to Jinsai Ito's discourse, presented the reformation design of Samurai regime and the strategy of turning the 'people' over to Samurai's side by interpreting confucianism to a political science. Norinaga Motoori, by the making the synthesis of kokugaku as ethno-centrism, made the principle of people's willing obedience to the emperor Tenno. Finally, I insist the political evolution of 'people' emerged early compared with other country in East Asia, but it caused the paradox of the early conservative resistance by the 'people' in Edo period of Japan. And it had a strong effect on the relationship between state and people in modern Japan.

Abstract

This paper aims to analyse the meaning of intellectual history which the movement of transformation or deconstruction of Neo-confucianism, as a political evolution of 'people' and the ideological struggle about it, is happened since the beginning of the study Neo-confucianism between the people of city in Edo period of Japan. First, in order to understand the reason why the political evolution of 'people' and the ideological struggle about it happened in Edo period, I emphasize it was important that there was the accidental combination of special conditions in politics, economy, international relation and the acceptance of Neo-confucianism having the principle everyone is equal by nature at that time. Second, the famous thinkers of the movement of transformation or deconstruction of Neo-confucianism, Jinsai Ito, Sorai Ogyu and Norinaga Motoori, are positioned to the typical example of the political evolution of 'people' and the ideological struggle about it. Jinsai Ito, through the reconstruction of confucianism with the critical approach about Neo-confucianism, produced the discourse of the political evolution of 'people'. Sorai Ogyu, in opposition to Jinsai Ito's discourse, presented the reformation design of Samurai regime and the strategy of turning the 'people' over to Samurai's side by interpreting confucianism to a political science. Norinaga Motoori, by the making the synthesis of kokugaku as ethno-centrism, made the principle of people's willing obedience to the emperor Tenno. Finally, I insist the political evolution of 'people' emerged early compared with other country in East Asia, but it caused the paradox of the early conservative resistance by the 'people' in Edo period of Japan. And it had a strong effect on the relationship between state and people in modern Japan.

참고문헌 (60)

  1. "語孟字義", ~
  2. "童子問", ~
  3. "論語古義", ~
  4. "仁齋日札", ~
  5. "弁道", ~
  6. "弁名", ~
  7. "太平策", ~
  8. "徂徠先生答問書", ~
  9. "政談", ~
  10. "蘐園随筆", ~
  11. "排蘆小船", ~
  12. "紫文要領", ~
  13. "石上私淑言", ~
  14. "秘本玉くしげ", ~
  15. "玉くしげ", ~
  16. "鈴屋答問錄", ~
  17. "古事記傳", ~
  18. "うひ山ふみ", ~
  19. "近思錄", ~
  20. "神皇正統記", ~
  21. "本佐錄", ~
  22. "聖學問答", ~
  23. "自然眞營道", ~
  24. 고희탁, "일본 근세의 공공적 삶과 윤리" (2009), 논형
  25. 고희탁, "국학과 일본주의: 일본 보수주의의 원류" (2011), 동북아역사재단
  26. 김영수, "조선 공론정치의 이상과 현실(I): 당쟁발생기 율곡 이이의 공론정치론을 중심으로", 한국정치학회보, 39(5), pp.7~27 (2005), 한국정치학회
  27. 로버트 니스벳, "보수주의" (2007), 비투비21
  28. 마루야마 마사오, "일본정치사상사연구" (1995), 통나무
  29. 이용수, "도쿠가와 시대의 철학사상" (2000), 예문서원
  30. 와타나베 히로시, "주자학과 근세일본사회" (2007), 예문서원
  31. 李碩圭, "麗末鮮初 新興儒臣의 民에 대한 인식", 조선시대사학보, (31), pp.5~38 (2004), 조선시대사학회
  32. 하우봉, "조선후기 실학자의 일본관연구" (1989), 일지사
  33. 김선욱, "예루살렘의 아이히만" (2006), 한길사
  34. 朝尾直弘, "<近世>とは何か, In 世界史のなかの近世日本 日本の近世1" (1991), 中央公論社
  35. 石毛忠, "江戶時代初期における<天>の思想", 日本思想史研究, (2) (1968)
  36. 石田良一, "伊藤仁齋" (1960), 吉川弘文館
  37. 伊東貴之, "中国近世思想史における同一性と差異性, In 中国という視座" (1995), 平凡社
  38. 宇野田尚哉, "板行儒書の普及と近世儒学, In 読書の社会史 江戶の思想5" (1996), ぺりかん社
  39. 大庭脩, "徳川宗吉と康煕帝:鎖国下における日中交流" (1999), 大修館書店
  40. 片岡龍, "荻生徂徠の天命説", 日本思想史学, (29) (1997)
  41. 片岡龍, "17世紀の学術思潮と荻生徂徠", 中国─社会と文化, (16) (2001)
  42. 黒住真, "儒学と日本近世社会, In 近世3 日本通史13" (1994), 岩波書店
  43. 高熙卓, "伊藤仁齋の<王道>論", 倫理学年報, (47) (1998)
  44. 小島毅, "朱子学と陽明学" (2004), 放送大学教育振興会
  45. 島田虔次, "朱子学と陽明学" (1967), 岩波文庫
  46. 高橋正和, "三浦梅園の思想" (1981), ぺりかん社
  47. 玉懸博之, "日本中世政治思想史研究" (1998), ぺりかん社
  48. 野口武彦, "王道と革命の間:日本思想と孟子問題" (1986), 筑摩書房
  49. 速水融, "概説: 17-18世紀, In 経済社会の成立 日本経済史1" (1988), 岩波書店
  50. 東島誠, "公共圈の歴史的創造: 江湖の思想へ" (2000), 東京大学出版会
  51. 尾藤正英, "國家主義の祖型としての徂徠, In 日本の名著 荻生徂徠" (1983), 中央公論社
  52. 尾藤正英, "日本文化の歴史" (2000), 岩波新書
  53. 福沢諭吉, "文明論之概略" (1995), 岩波書店
  54. 藤田覺, "朝幕關係の轉換, In 近世政治史と天皇" (1999), 吉川弘文館
  55. 前田勉, "近世日本における天皇権威の浮上の理由, In 近世神道と国学" (2002), ぺりかん社
  56. 松本三之介, "天皇制國家と政治思想" (1973), 未來社
  57. 横田冬彦, "近世民衆社会における知的読者の成立:益軒本を読む時代, In 読書の社会史 江戶の思想5" (1996), ぺりかん社
  58. 若尾政希, "<太平記>読みの時代" (1999), 平凡社
  59. 渡辺浩, "<泰平>と<皇國>, In 東アジアの王権と思想" (1997), 東京大學出版會
  60. Roger Chartier, "書物の秩序" (1996), 筑摩書房

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)