에도막부의 천황관에 대한 재고 — 천황에 대한 막부의 통제를 중심으로 —

Abstract

Research on the view of the Tennou in the early modern period has changed from an aspect of control over the Imperial Court of the Shogunate to an aspect that is essential. In this paper, this kind of perception change is conducted throughout the study of Japanese history. In this paper, we consider such changes in recognition as part of the role emphasis of layers and the assertion of consensus politics, which are conducted throughout the study of Japanese history. In this paper the control aspect of the shogunate’s Imperial Court and Emperor was proved with analysis of previous studies on royal authority theory of early modern and analysis of Article 1 of the “Kinchu Narabani Kuge Shohatto” and the abdication issue of Emperor Edo. The reason why Syogun could not become kings in royal authority theory of early modern, in the analysis of Article 1 of the “Kinchu Narabani Kuge Shohatto”, emphasis was placed on the aspect of control, focusing on the fact that the general who was the subject of the virtue to be protected by the king was the main subject. In the Tennou’s abdication process, the control was revealed based on the process of making a decision to ignore the Tennou’s intention while the generals were fully involved in the execution of the abdication. As mentioned above, the Tennou’s existence in the early modern period would have been survived by adding control to the Shogunate to use the Tennou. However, do you emphasize the control aspect? The debate over whether to emphasize the need for existence will require more research accumulation and analysis.