본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Normative Review on Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis (NIPD): Focusing on the German Discussion on PrenaTest®

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류생물학

초록

This article aims to introduce German discussion on the approval of the non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD), which started with the development of PrenaTest® by LifeCodexx AG. The discussion started with the concern that the non-invasive nature of NIPD, such as PrenaTest® , may rapidly expand the use and scope of similar tests, thus leading to a new era of eugenics. Based on this concern, the need for clear clinical guidelines on specific indications for NIPD has been suggested. Along the same line, it was discussed whether PrenaTest® is against the Basic Law prohibiting discrimination on grounds of disability and whether the test is outside the scope of the purpose of gene testing limited by Genetic Diagnosis Act. Through such discussion, the Federal Ministry of Health of Germany established the preconditions for inclusion of NIPD in the German public health insurance system. For this, the German motherhood guideline was amended and the information for the insured persons provided to pregnant women was included in the amended guideline. Such discussion made in Germany provides insight on which points should be considered when various gene testings are accepted in Korea , in which genetic communication has not been systematized yet. In particular, German counseling system for pregnant women will provide valuable insights for Korea where the direction for regulations on abortion has not been established even after the ruling by the Constitutional Court that charges for abortion are against the constitution.

Abstract

This article aims to introduce German discussion on the approval of the non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD), which started with the development of PrenaTest® by LifeCodexx AG. The discussion started with the concern that the non-invasive nature of NIPD, such as PrenaTest® , may rapidly expand the use and scope of similar tests, thus leading to a new era of eugenics. Based on this concern, the need for clear clinical guidelines on specific indications for NIPD has been suggested. Along the same line, it was discussed whether PrenaTest® is against the Basic Law prohibiting discrimination on grounds of disability and whether the test is outside the scope of the purpose of gene testing limited by Genetic Diagnosis Act. Through such discussion, the Federal Ministry of Health of Germany established the preconditions for inclusion of NIPD in the German public health insurance system. For this, the German motherhood guideline was amended and the information for the insured persons provided to pregnant women was included in the amended guideline. Such discussion made in Germany provides insight on which points should be considered when various gene testings are accepted in Korea , in which genetic communication has not been systematized yet. In particular, German counseling system for pregnant women will provide valuable insights for Korea where the direction for regulations on abortion has not been established even after the ruling by the Constitutional Court that charges for abortion are against the constitution.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. Arztebl D, "Genanalysen in der schwangerenvorsorge: Keine zeit zum nachdenken", Dtsch Arztebl, 111, pp.A1806~ (2014)
  2. "6.000 Down-Syndrom-Bluttests im ersten Jahrw" (2013)[URL]
  3. "Kammer Hessen fordert klare Richtlinien für genetische Pränataltests" (2014)[URL]
  4. Gärditz KF, "Gutachtliche Stellungnahme zur Zulässigkeit des Diagnostikprodukts “PrenaTest”", Beauftragten der Bunderegierung für die Belange behinderter Menschen, ~ (2012)
  5. Henn W, "Pränataldiagnostik: Paradigmenwechsel", Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 109, pp.A1306~ (2012)
  6. "Zur verfassungrechtlichen Beurteilung frühzeitiger pränataler Diagnostik" (2013)[URL]
  7. Kim NK, "Termination of pregnancy on the ground of fetal disability", J Crim Law, 19, pp.127~165 (2007)
  8. Kim NK, "A note on the normative control method of medical practice: Justification of voluntary non-health care benefits control in the light of the German medical insurance system", Hum Right Justice, 392, pp.73~89 (2009)
  9. 김나경, "장애 이해의 해석학적 구조화와 법: 생명윤리안전법상 유전자검사 규율의 방향 모색", 생명윤리, 16(2), pp.67~84 (2015), 한국생명윤리학회
  10. 김나경, "독일 유전자검사법의 규율 구조 이해 - 의료 목적 유전자검사의 문제를 중심으로 -", 의료법학, 17(2), pp.85~124 (2016), 대한의료법학회
  11. "PrenaTest®" (2021)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)