본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Informed choice of pregnant women regarding noninvasive prenatal testing in Korea: a cross-sectional study

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류간호학

초록

Purpose: This study explored the degree to which pregnant women in Korea made informed choices regarding noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and investigated factors influencing whether they made informed choices.Methods: In total, 129 pregnant women in Korea participated in a web-based survey. Multidimensional measures of informed choice regarding NIPT and decisional conflict were used to measure participants’ levels of knowledge, attitudes, deliberation, uptake, and decisional conflict related to NIPT. Additional questions were asked about participants’ NIPT experiences and opinions.Results: All 129 pregnant women were recruited from an online community. Excluding those who expressed neutral attitudes toward NIPT, according to the definition of informed choice used in this study, only 91 made an informed choice (n=63, 69.2%) or an uninformed choice (n=28, 30.8%). Of the latter, 75.0% had insufficient knowledge, 39.3% made a value-inconsistent decision, and 14.3% did not deliberate sufficiently. No difference in decisional conflict was found between the two groups. A significant difference was found between the two groups in the reasons why NIPT was introduced or recommended (p=.021). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that pregnant women who were knowledgeable (odds ratio [OR], 4.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.17–10.47) and deliberated (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57–0.98) were significantly more likely to make an informed choice.Conclusion: The results of this study help healthcare providers, including nurses in maternity units, understand pregnant women’s experiences of NIPT. Counseling strategies are needed to improve pregnant women’s knowledge of NIPT and create an environment that promotes deliberation regarding this decision.

Abstract

Purpose: This study explored the degree to which pregnant women in Korea made informed choices regarding noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and investigated factors influencing whether they made informed choices.Methods: In total, 129 pregnant women in Korea participated in a web-based survey. Multidimensional measures of informed choice regarding NIPT and decisional conflict were used to measure participants’ levels of knowledge, attitudes, deliberation, uptake, and decisional conflict related to NIPT. Additional questions were asked about participants’ NIPT experiences and opinions.Results: All 129 pregnant women were recruited from an online community. Excluding those who expressed neutral attitudes toward NIPT, according to the definition of informed choice used in this study, only 91 made an informed choice (n=63, 69.2%) or an uninformed choice (n=28, 30.8%). Of the latter, 75.0% had insufficient knowledge, 39.3% made a value-inconsistent decision, and 14.3% did not deliberate sufficiently. No difference in decisional conflict was found between the two groups. A significant difference was found between the two groups in the reasons why NIPT was introduced or recommended (p=.021). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that pregnant women who were knowledgeable (odds ratio [OR], 4.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.17–10.47) and deliberated (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57–0.98) were significantly more likely to make an informed choice.Conclusion: The results of this study help healthcare providers, including nurses in maternity units, understand pregnant women’s experiences of NIPT. Counseling strategies are needed to improve pregnant women’s knowledge of NIPT and create an environment that promotes deliberation regarding this decision.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. "What is noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and what disorders can it screen for?" (2021)[URL]
  2. Sian Taylor-Phillips, "Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis", BMJ Open, 6(1), pp.e010002~ (2016), BMJ[DOI]
  3. Joseph J. Noh, "A two-year experience of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at an urban tertiary medical center in South Korea", Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 58(4), pp.545~551 (2019), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  4. Charles Dupras, "Benefits, challenges and ethical principles associated with implementing noninvasive prenatal testing: a Delphi study", CMAJ Open, 6(4), pp.E513~E519 (2018), CMA Impact Inc.[DOI]
  5. Megan Allyse, "Non-invasive prenatal testing: a review of international implementation and challenges", International Journal of Women's Health, 7, pp.113~126 (2015), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  6. Seung-Ah Choe, "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening and Diagnostic Testing from Korean Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Cell-Free DNA Screening", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 35(40) (2020), Korean Academy of Medical Sciences[DOI]
  7. "Fertility rate by maternal age (1999-2019)" (2020)[URL]
  8. Thomas J. Musci, "Non-invasive prenatal testing with cell-free DNA: US physician attitudes toward implementation in clinical practice", Prenatal Diagnosis, 33(5), pp.424~428 (2013), Wiley[DOI]
  9. Mikamo S, "Knowledge and attitudes toward non-invasive prenatal testing among pregnant Japanese women", Acta Med Okayama, 69(3), pp.155~163 (2015)[DOI]
  10. M Allyse, "Attitudes towards non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy among US adults of reproductive age", Journal of Perinatology, 34(6), pp.429~434 (2014), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  11. Rachèl V. van Schendel, "What Do Parents of Children with Down Syndrome Think about Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)?", Journal of Genetic Counseling, 26(3), pp.522~531 (2016), Wiley[DOI]
  12. Vanstone M, "Perspectives of pregnant people and clinicians on noninvasive prenatal testing : a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis", Ont Health Technol Assess Ser, 19(5), pp.1~38 (2019)
  13. Alexandra Cernat, "Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women’s experiences", BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), pp.27~ (2019), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  14. Theresa M. Marteau, "A measure of informed choice", Health Expectations, 4(2), pp.99~108 (2001), Wiley[DOI]
  15. Celine Lewis, "Development and validation of a measure of informed choice for women undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy", European Journal of Human Genetics, 24(6), pp.809~816 (2015), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  16. Lin Yu, "Decision aids for prenatal testing: A systematic review and meta‐analysis", Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(10), pp.3964~3979 (2021), Wiley[DOI]
  17. Annette M. O'Connor, "Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale", Medical Decision Making, 15(1), pp.25~30 (1995), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  18. "User manual-decisional conflict scale" (2010)[URL]
  19. Celine Lewis, "Women’s Experiences and Preferences for Service Delivery of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Aneuploidy in a Public Health Setting: A Mixed Methods Study", PLOS ONE, 11(4), pp.e0153147~ (2016), Public Library of Science (PLoS)[DOI]
  20. "What is a genetics nurse?" (2020)[URL]
  21. Letícia Olandin Heck, "Nursing and advocacy in health: An integrative review", Nursing Ethics, 29(4), pp.1014~1034 (2022), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  22. 전명희, "최신 비침습적 산전 유전 검사(NIPT)의 임상 적용과간호학적 의미", 한국간호교육학회지, 19(4), pp.675~683 (2013), 한국간호교육학회[DOI]
  23. 김수현, "Korean physicians’ attitudes toward the prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy and implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing with cell-free fetal DNA", Journal of Genetic Medicine, 15(2), pp.72~78 (2018), 대한의학유전학회[DOI]
  24. van Gelder MM, "Web-based questionnaires : the future in epidemiology?", Am J Epidemiol, 172(11), pp.1292~1298 (2010)[DOI]
  25. "Internet (OECD)" (2021)[URL]
  26. Lean Beulen, "The effect of a decision aid on informed decision-making in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a randomised controlled trial", European Journal of Human Genetics, 24(10), pp.1409~1416 (2016), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  27. "WHODAS 2.0 translation package (version 1.0): Translation and linguistic evaluation protocol and supporting material" (2012)[URL]
  28. Shi J, "Content validity index in scale development", Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, 37(2), pp.152~155 (2012)[DOI]
  29. Young Ho Yun, "Use of a Decision Aid to Help Caregivers Discuss Terminal Disease Status With a Family Member With Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial", Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(36), pp.4811~4819 (2011), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)[DOI]
  30. Paige Cornell, "Experiences of non‐invasive prenatal screening: A survey study", Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 62(2), pp.241~249 (2021), Wiley[DOI]
  31. Celine Lewis, "Offering non-invasive prenatal testing as part of routine clinical service. Can high levels of informed choice be maintained?", Prenatal Diagnosis, 37(11), pp.1130~1137 (2017), Wiley[DOI]
  32. 이찬희, "진료과별 적정 외래 진료시간에 관한 연구", 보건행정학회지, 24(3), pp.254~260 (2014), 한국보건행정학회[DOI]
  33. Aimée C. Dane, "Talking Points: Women’s Information Needs for Informed Decision-Making About Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Down Syndrome", Journal of Genetic Counseling, 27(5), pp.1258~1264 (2018), Wiley[DOI]
  34. Karuna R. M. van der Meij, "Routinization of prenatal screening with the non-invasive prenatal test: pregnant women’s perspectives", European Journal of Human Genetics, 30(6), pp.661~668 (2021), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  35. Rachèl V. Schendel, "Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non‐invasive prenatal testing. Part II—women's perspectives", Prenatal Diagnosis, 36(12), pp.1091~1098 (2016), Wiley[DOI]
  36. Sian Karen Smith, "Improving women’s knowledge about prenatal screening in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome – development and acceptability of a low literacy decision aid", BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18(1), pp.499~ (2018), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  37. Caroline Silcock, "Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome undermine informed choice?", Health Expectations, 18(5), pp.1658~1671 (2014), Wiley[DOI]
  38. Anne-Marie Laberge, "Canadian Pregnant Women's Preferences Regarding NIPT for Down Syndrome: The Information They Want, How They Want to Get It, and With Whom They Want to Discuss It", Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 41(6), pp.782~791 (2019), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  39. D. Oepkes, "Counseling for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): what pregnant women may want to know", Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 44(1), pp.1~5 (2014), Wiley[DOI]
  40. van der Meij KR, "Non-invasive prenatal test uptake in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods", Prenat Diagn, 41(11), pp.1395~1400 (2021)[DOI]
  41. "Prenatal deformity screening NIPT: looking at the medical expenses, regional differences are 'clear'" (2021)[URL]
  42. Kasper Gadsbøll, "Current use of noninvasive prenatal testing in Europe, Australia and the USA: A graphical presentation", Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 99(6), pp.722~730 (2020), Wiley[DOI]
  43. Bettina Schöne-Seifert, "Making use of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): rethinking issues of routinization and pressure", Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 49(8), pp.959~964 (2021), Walter de Gruyter GmbH[DOI]
  44. 최안나, "낙태법 개정 관련 의료적 이슈와 산부인과의 입장", 한국모자보건학회지, 24(1), pp.9~17 (2020), 한국모자보건학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)