한중 학술 논문에 나타난대인 관계적 메타담화 표지 대조 연구 -결론 부분을 중심으로-
A study on the contrast of interactional metadiscourse markers in Korean and Chinese articles- Focusing on the conclusion part.
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to reveal similarities and differences by comparing and analyzing interpersonal metadiscourse markers that appear in the conclusion texts of academic papers in the field of Korean and Chinese language education. For analysis, a list of interpersonal meta-discourse markers was selected by referring to Hyland(2004) and previous studies. In addition, we examined interpersonal metadiscourse markers focusing on hedge markers, booster markers, author attitude markers, and author reference markers that appeared in the conclusions of 30 Korean and 30 Chinese articles. As a result of the analysis, there was a commonality in that the author attitude marker was frequently used in both Korean and Chinese articles, and the use of the booster marker was the least. In addition, in terms of frequency, it was found that hedge marks were the most frequently used in Korean articles, and author reference marks were used the most in Chinese articles. The causes of this pattern could be explored in various factors such as thesis structure, norms of the academic community, way of thinking and cultural influence, and type of research in the two countries. The results of this study emphasized the need to select and use genre characteristics of texts and meta-discourse markers in teaching reading or writing academic texts for Korean language learners, and suggested that an appropriate educational direction needs to be established.
Abstract
This study aims to reveal similarities and differences by comparing and analyzing interpersonal metadiscourse markers that appear in the conclusion texts of academic papers in the field of Korean and Chinese language education. For analysis, a list of interpersonal meta-discourse markers was selected by referring to Hyland(2004) and previous studies. In addition, we examined interpersonal metadiscourse markers focusing on hedge markers, booster markers, author attitude markers, and author reference markers that appeared in the conclusions of 30 Korean and 30 Chinese articles. As a result of the analysis, there was a commonality in that the author attitude marker was frequently used in both Korean and Chinese articles, and the use of the booster marker was the least. In addition, in terms of frequency, it was found that hedge marks were the most frequently used in Korean articles, and author reference marks were used the most in Chinese articles. The causes of this pattern could be explored in various factors such as thesis structure, norms of the academic community, way of thinking and cultural influence, and type of research in the two countries. The results of this study emphasized the need to select and use genre characteristics of texts and meta-discourse markers in teaching reading or writing academic texts for Korean language learners, and suggested that an appropriate educational direction needs to be established.
참고문헌 (45)
- 강영란, "영어 모어 화자의 한국어 논설문에 나타난 메타담화표지 사용 양상", 새국어교육, (127), pp.517~549 (2021), 한국국어교육학회[DOI]
- 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2008), 집문당
- 박나리, "‘-는 것이다’ 구문 연구 -문법기능과 담화기능 그리고 화자의 담화전략의 상관성을 중심으로-", 國語學, (65), pp.251~279 (2012), 국어학회[DOI]
- 박나리, "학문목적 한국어 쓰기 학습자를 위한학술논문 각주 분석텍스트기능과 기능별 언어표현을 중심으로", 작문연구, (17), pp.227~269 (2013), 한국작문학회
- 박나리, "학문목적 한국어학습자의 학술논문에 나타난 자기의견표현담화 분석", 한국문예창작, 12(1), pp.267~307 (2013), 한국문예창작학회
- 박나리, "담화화용 및 텍스트 관점에서 본 한국어의 '자기인용구문'", 텍스트언어학, 37(0), pp.65~96 (2014), 한국텍스트언어학회[DOI]
- 박나리, "한국어의 '자기인용구문'에 대하여", 언어와 정보 사회, 23, pp.1~31 (2014), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 박나리, "학문목적 한국어 쓰기 학습자를 위한 자기인용의 ‘-다고 하-’ 구문 교육방안", 언어와 정보 사회, 27, pp.119~148 (2016), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 박수연, "학문 목적 한국어 학습자의 쓰기 교육을 위한 학위논문의 장르분석 연구: <선행연구> 부분을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2016
- 박지희, "학문목적 한국어 쓰기 교육을 위한 경영학 학위논문의 장르 분석", 석사, pp.2016
- 신영주, "한국어 화자와 중국인 한국어 학습자의 학위 논문 서론의 완화 표지 사용 양상 비교", 담화와 인지, 18(1), pp.63~77 (2011), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- 신지연, "인문학 학술텍스트의 담화 특징", 텍스트언어학, 35, pp.123~144 (2013), 한국텍스트언어학회[DOI]
- 신진원, "번역을 위한 다시쓰기 대상으로서의 메타담화: 전문 번역과 학생 번역과의 차이에 관한 사례연구", 번역학연구, 16(2), pp.63~85 (2015), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 안소진, "학술논문 문형의 문법적 특징과 담화 기능에 대하여 - 국어국문학 분야 학술논문을 대상으로", 어문연구, 73, pp.87~107 (2012), 어문연구학회[DOI]
- 안주호, "한국어 명사의 문법화 현상 연구" (1997), 한국문화사
- 염재상, "한국어 양상표현 ‘-ㄹ 수 있다’의 중의성과 의미해석들", 불어불문학연구, 38(2), pp.517~546 (1999)
- 이슬비, "한국어 학술 텍스트의 필자 태도 표현 교육 연구", 박사, pp.2016
- 이윤진, "학술텍스트에 나타나는 ‘-겠-’ 결합형문형의 사용 양상 분석 - 한국어 논문쓰기 교육에의 활용을 목적으로 -", 작문연구, (25), pp.127~156 (2015), 한국작문학회
- 이준호, "학술 텍스트에 나타난 한국어 헤지 표현 선정 연구", 이중언어학, (49), pp.269~297 (2012), 이중언어학회[DOI]
- 정혜승, "대화적 문식성 교육을 위한 상위담화(metadiscourse) 범주 구성 연구", 국어교육학연구, (43), pp.459~485 (2012), 국어교육학회[DOI]
- 진염평, "화용신분 이론에서 본 중국인 연구자와 한국인 연구자의 학술지 논문 초록 메타담화 대조 연구-국어국문학 영역의 논문을 중심으로-", 한국어학, 96, pp.151~183 (2022), 한국어학회
- 홍혜란, "한국어 교육을 위한 텍스트 장르별 메타 담화 표지 연구", 국제어문, (84), pp.79~114 (2020), 국제어문학회[DOI]
- 吴格奇, "汉语学术论文中作者立场标记语研究", 语言教学与研究, 3, pp.91~96 (2010)
- 吴格奇, "学术论文作者自称与身份构建-一项基于语料库的英汉对比研究", 解放军外国语学院学报, 3, pp.6~11 (2013)
- 庄凯丽, "汉语教学类期刊论文立场标记语研究", 硕士, pp.2014
- Biber, D., "Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect", Text-interdisciplinary journal for the study of discourse, 9(1), pp.93~124 (1989)
- Bitchener, J., "Writing an applied linguistics thesis or dissertation:Agui de t o presenti ng empiri cal research", pp.2010
- Crismore, A., "Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing : A Study of Texts Written by American and Finnish University Students", Written Communication, 10, pp.39~71 (1993)
- Golmohammadi, S., "Socio–Cognitive perspective to the analysis of the strategic features of the discussion section of research articles in applied linguistics:Nati ve vs. non-native researchers", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, pp.604~613 (2014)
- Halliday, M. A. K., "An Introduction to Functional Grammar" (1994), Edward Arnold. and R. Hasan
- Harris, Z., "Linguistic transformations for information retrieval", Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Informaiton, 2 (1959), National Academi c of Sci ences-National Research Council (NAS-NRC)
- Hess, D. R., "How to wri te an effective discussion", Respi ratory care, 49(10), pp.1238~1241 (2004)
- Hofstede, G., "Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind" (1994), Harper Collins
- Hu, G., "Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles : A comparative study of English-and Chinesemedium journals", Journal of Pragmatics, 43(11), pp.2759~2809 (2011)
- Hunston, S., "Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse: Authorial stance and the construction o f di scourse" (2000), Oxford Uni versi ty Press
- Hyland, K., "Hedging in scientific research articles" (1998), John Benjamins
- Hyland, K., "Humble Servants of the Discipline? Self-Mention in Research Articles", English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), pp.207~ (2001)
- Hyland, K., "Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing" (2005), Continuum
- Hyland, K., "Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse", Discourse studies, 7(2), pp.173~192 (2005)
- Hyland, K., "In thi s paper we suggest: Changing patterns of d i scipli nary m etadi scourse", English for Specific Purposes, 51, pp.18~30 (2018)
- Hyland, K., "Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal", Applied linguistics, 25(2), pp.156~177 (2004)
- Martin, J. R., "Evaluation in text", pp.142~175 (2000)
- Ruiying, Y., "Research articles in applied linguistics : Moving from results to conclusions", English for specific purposes, 22(4), pp.365~385 (2003)
- Wallwork, A., "English for Writing Research Paper" (2011), Spring
- White, P. R., "Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance", Text & Talk, 23(2), pp.259~284 (2003)