본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

노년기 우울 증상 평가에서 주관적 척도와 객관적 척도 간 상관성 연구

A Study on the Correlation Between Subjective and Objective Scales in the Evaluation of Depressive Symptoms for the Elderly

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between subjective and objective depression rating scale for the elderly with depressive symptoms. Methods: Thirty three outpatients aged more than 55 with depressive symptoms were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnare-9 (PHQ-9) and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Similar items from each scale were paired to investigate their correlations. The level of agreement between the PHQ-9 and the MADRS was also assessed for subjects by using discrepancy-score. Results: Correlation between total scores of the PHQ-9 and the MADRS was significant (r=0.85, p<0.001). There were significant correlations between the paired items except for the item about volition. These results were the same in the group whose total education years are 7 or more. However, in the group whose total education years are 6 or less, there was no significant correlation between the paired items about sleep, concentration and volition. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that using the PHQ-9 in elderly patients is reliable and education level might be considered when interpreting the scale.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between subjective and objective depression rating scale for the elderly with depressive symptoms. Methods: Thirty three outpatients aged more than 55 with depressive symptoms were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnare-9 (PHQ-9) and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Similar items from each scale were paired to investigate their correlations. The level of agreement between the PHQ-9 and the MADRS was also assessed for subjects by using discrepancy-score. Results: Correlation between total scores of the PHQ-9 and the MADRS was significant (r=0.85, p<0.001). There were significant correlations between the paired items except for the item about volition. These results were the same in the group whose total education years are 7 or more. However, in the group whose total education years are 6 or less, there was no significant correlation between the paired items about sleep, concentration and volition. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that using the PHQ-9 in elderly patients is reliable and education level might be considered when interpreting the scale.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. "World Health Organization"[URL]
  2. "Ministry of Health and Welfare"[URL]
  3. "Statistics Korea"[URL]
  4. Korean Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, "Geriatric psychiatry. 2nd ed", ML Communication, ~ (2015)
  5. Ministry of Health and Welfare, "White paper on suicide prevention 2021" (2021), Korea Foundation for Suicide Prevention
  6. Hamilton M, "A rating scale for depression", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 23, pp.56~62 (1960)
  7. Montgomery SA, "A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change", Br J Psychiatry, 134, pp.382~389 (1979)
  8. Beck AT, "An inventory for measuring depression", Arch Gen Psychiatry, 4, pp.561~571 (1961)
  9. Yesavage JA, "Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale : a preliminary report", J Psychiatr Res, 17, pp.37~49 (1982)
  10. Radloff LS, "The CES-D scale : a self-report depression scale for research in the general population", Appl Psychol Meas, 1, pp.385~401 (1977)
  11. Spitzer RL, "Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD : the PHQ primary care study", JAMA, 282, pp.1737~1744 (1999)
  12. Faravelli C, "Assessment of depression : a comparison of rating scales", J Affect Disord, 11, pp.245~253 (1986)
  13. Senra C, "Concordance between clinical and self-report depression scales during the acute phase and after treatment", J Affect Disord, 27, pp.13~19 (1993)
  14. Domken M, "What factors predict discrepancies between self and observer ratings of depression?", J Affect Disord, 31, pp.253~259 (1994)
  15. Lyness JM, "Older age and the underreporting of depressive symptoms", J Am Geriatr Soc, 43, pp.216~221 (1995)
  16. Corruble E, "Concordance between self-report and clinician’s assessment of depression", J Psychiatr Res, 33, pp.457~465 (1999)
  17. Enns MW, "Discrepancies between self and observer ratings of depression. The relationship to demographic, clinical and personality variables", J Affect Disord, 60, pp.33~41 (2000)
  18. 안용민, "한글판 Montgomery-Åsberg 우울증 평가 척도의 표준화 연구", 신경정신의학, 44(4), pp.466~476 (2005), 대한신경정신의학회
  19. Rush AJ, "An evaluation of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression:a Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression trial report", Biol Psychiatry, 59, pp.493~501 (2006)
  20. Carter JD, "The relationship of demographic, clinical, cognitive and personality variables to the discrepancy between self and clinician rated depression", J Affect Disord, 124, pp.202~206 (2010)
  21. Dunlop BW, "Correlation between patient and clinician assessments of depression severity in the PREVENT study", Psychiatry Res, 177, pp.177~183 (2010)
  22. Dunlop BW, "Concordance between clinician and patient ratings as predictors of response, remission, and recurrence in major depressive disorder", J Psychiatr Res, 45, pp.96~103 (2011)
  23. Uher R, "Self-report and clinician-rated measures of depression severity: can one replace the other?", Depress Anxiety, 29, pp.1043~1049 (2012)
  24. 이산, "한국판 역학연구 우울척도 개정판(K-CESD-R)의 표준화 연구", 정신신체의학, 24(1), pp.83~93 (2016), 한국정신신체의학회
  25. Rane LJ, "Discrepancy between subjective and objective severity in treatment-resistant depression: prediction of treatment outcome", J Psychiatr Res, 44, pp.1082~1087 (2010)
  26. Dunlop BW, "How well do clinicians and patients agree on depression treatment outcomes? Implications for personalized medicine", Hum Psychopharmacol, 29, pp.528~536 (2014)
  27. Hershenberg R, "Concordance between clinician-rated and patient reported outcome measures of depressive symptoms in treatment resistant depression", J Affect Disord, 266, pp.22~29 (2020)
  28. Inoue T, "Utility and limitations of PHQ-9 in a clinic specializing in psychiatric care", BMC Psychiatry, 12, pp.73~ (2012)
  29. Dorz S, "Comparison of self-rated and clinician-rated measures of depressive symptoms:a naturalistic study", Psychol Psychother, 77, pp.353~361 (2004)
  30. 박승진, "한글판 우울증 선별도구(Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9)의 신뢰도와 타당도", 대한불안의학회지, 6(2), pp.119~124 (2010), 대한불안의학회

관련 논문AI추천

Validation of the Korean Version of the Depression in Old Age Scale and Comparison with Other Depression Screening Questionnaires Used in Elderly Patients in Medical SettingsBeomwoo Nam, Bo-Hyun Yoon, Hyung-Mo Sung, In Hee Shim, Jeong Seok Seo, Ji Sun Kim, Moon Doo Kim, Sae-Heon Jang, Won-Myong Bahk, Young-Eun Jung, Young Joon Kwon, Young Sup Woo대한정신약물학회 · Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience2019 · 제17권 제3호노인과 노인 제외 성인 주요우울장애 외래 환자 간의 해밀턴 우울증 척도의 우울증상 비교김기원, 김동준, 백지현, 유익기, 유혜진, 전홍진, 허정윤대한신경정신의학회 · 신경정신의학2015 · 제54권 제3호한글판 우울증 선별도구(Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9)의 신뢰도와 타당도김건우, 박승진, 최지혜, 최혜라, 홍진표대한불안의학회 · 대한불안의학회지2010 · 제6권 제2호연령별 우울증상의 차이와 노년기 선별검사이유라, 조은정대한노인정신의학회 · 노인정신의학2013 · 제17권 제1호한국어판 우울증 선별도구(Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9)의 표준화 연구김정범, 서은란, 신재현, 안제용, 임경희대한생물치료정신의학회 · 생물치료정신의학2013 · 제19권 제1호당뇨병을 가진 노인 환자에서의 우울증 유병률 조사권영준, 김세웅, 김여주, 박상호, 박선철, 송후림, 심세훈, 이호성, 이화영, 장성혜, 최범성, 최재성대한신경정신의학회 · 신경정신의학2015 · 제54권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)