범죄피해자구조법의 몇 가지 쟁점
Issues at Act on Support for Victim
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
This article especially puts emphasis on financial support among a diversity of countermeasure for victim. Act on Support for Victim provides requisite and range of financial support, etc. The point at issues and improvement about Act on Support for Victim are as follows. 1. The object of financial support is restricted to an intentional offense according to Act on Support for Victim. But an intentional offense and an accidential offense is little difference in the result of offense. It is required that the financial aid is accomplished to an accidential offense. 2. As Act on Support for Victim provides financial aid is valid for only death or serious injury of victim, range of financial aid is extremely rigid. It is necessary that financial aid is extended to ordinary injury(on a scale of seven to fourteen) that is not included to serious injury(on a scale of one to six) provided by Act on Support for Victim. 3. Act on Support for Victim provided it should be considered for determination of financial aid amount how many dependant does victim have. Act on Support for Victim should be revised for various object element(besides a number of dependant) to be reflected in the calculation of financial aid. 4. The offender’s indistinctness or pennilessness is a requisite of financial aid according to Act on Support for Victim. But this requisite is removed from Act on Support for Victim because financial aid is functioning as a kind of social security measure. 5. Act on Support for Victim have exception clauses for financial aid. It is as follows. ① a case that offender is a relative of victim ② a case victim causes offense or is responsible for offense ③ a case restriction of financial aid have rational reasons by common sense. It is unreasonable to exempt victim from financial aid only on the ground of relationship between offender and victim. Therefore a case ① should be removed. 6. There are opinions that §8③ of Act on Support for Victim should be abolished. It is a clause acknowledges a right to indemnity to a pecuniary aid for working of a convict(offender). But I think it is reasonable to retain this clause.
참고문헌 (10)
- 범죄피해자구조제도에 관한 연구, "이건호", 33~ (1999)
- 이호중, "피해자에 대한 물질적 지원-피해구조와 배상적 화해의 간극", 피해자학연구, (8), pp.405~ (2000)
- 송광섭, "우리나라 범죄피해자구제의 현황과 범죄피해자보호의 새로운 과제", 피해자학연구, (5), pp.96~ (1997)
- 김용세, "犯罪被害者救助制度에 관한 小考", 비교형사법연구, 4(2), pp.19~552 (2002), 한국비교형사법학회
- 박미숙, "현행법상 범죄피해자 지원방안", 피해자학연구, 10(2), pp.143~168 (2002), 한국피해자학회
- 주광일, "범죄피해자구조법제정의 기본방향", 유기천박사 고희기념논문집, pp.302~ (1988)
- 김동철의원 대표발의안 검토보고서, , 5~ (2009)
- 김덕재, "우리나라 범죄피해자 보호, 지원 업무 개선 방안", 저스티스, (82), pp.28~59 (2004), 한국법학원
- 조균석, "피해자구조제도의 운용현황", 피해자학연구, pp.103~ (1992)
- "범죄피해자보호법 전부개정법률안(2008.11) 제22조", ~ (2008)
