본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

CEO Characteristics and the Corporate Philanthropy in Korean Firms: A Quantile Regression Approach

민인식|정무관|남종훈
한국전략경영학회 (Korean Strategic Management Society)|2016.04|전략경영연구 (Journal of Strategic Management)|제19권 제1호|pp. 79-102|DOI 10.17786/jsm.2016.19.1.004

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Corporate PhilanthropyCEO DualityCEO TenureCEO as OwnerSimultaneous Quantile Regression
주제분류경영학

초록

This paper analyzes three CEO characteristics as potential determinants of corporate philanthropy for a sample of Korean firms by using the simultaneous quantile regression method to supplement the limitations of conventional regression approaches. The study empirically investigates the relationship between selected CEO characteristics and corporate philanthropy using the stakeholder theory. Our empirical evidence indicates that every quantile of CEOs who act as firm owners have a negative relationship towards giving, although statistically insignificant. When a CEO owner allocates more to giving, the expenditure is more negatively associated with corporate philanthropy. Second, a CEO’s dual role as owner is generally negatively associated with corporate philanthropy; however, this dynamics requires further investigation because the effect changes from negative to positive. Third, the longer a CEO’s tenure, the greater the negative correlation with giving; this negative relationship does not change depending on the level of corporate philanthropy. The Fama-Macbeth model and the OLS model also generate results similar to those of the above quantile regression model. In summary, using the quantile regression approach, together with other robust tests, we confirm negative relationships between Korean CEOs and corporate philanthropy. Moreover, the negative effects show different patterns depending on the level of corporate philanthropy.

Abstract

This paper analyzes three CEO characteristics as potential determinants of corporate philanthropy for a sample of Korean firms by using the simultaneous quantile regression method to supplement the limitations of conventional regression approaches. The study empirically investigates the relationship between selected CEO characteristics and corporate philanthropy using the stakeholder theory. Our empirical evidence indicates that every quantile of CEOs who act as firm owners have a negative relationship towards giving, although statistically insignificant. When a CEO owner allocates more to giving, the expenditure is more negatively associated with corporate philanthropy. Second, a CEO’s dual role as owner is generally negatively associated with corporate philanthropy; however, this dynamics requires further investigation because the effect changes from negative to positive. Third, the longer a CEO’s tenure, the greater the negative correlation with giving; this negative relationship does not change depending on the level of corporate philanthropy. The Fama-Macbeth model and the OLS model also generate results similar to those of the above quantile regression model. In summary, using the quantile regression approach, together with other robust tests, we confirm negative relationships between Korean CEOs and corporate philanthropy. Moreover, the negative effects show different patterns depending on the level of corporate philanthropy.

참고문헌 (68)

  1. 김영미, "Exploring the Effects of Audit Committee Characteristics on Firm Performance and CEO Tenure as a Moderator", 연세경영연구, 49(2), pp.187~214 (2012), 경영연구소
  2. 박종훈, "최고경영자(CEO)의 경험과 기업의 국제화: CEO 영향력의 조절효과", 국제경영연구, 25(1), pp.29~58 (2014), 한국국제경영학회[DOI]
  3. 신현한, "대규모기업집단 소속 기업의 소유구조와 경영성과 - 결합재무제표의 소유구조 자료를 이용하여 -", 연세경영연구, 40(2), pp.141~164 (2003), 경영연구소
  4. 이병희, "다국적기업 본국의 제도적 환경이 기업 경쟁력과 기업의 사회적 책임에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 연세경영연구, 51(1), pp.131~154 (2014), 경영연구소
  5. 이인석, "다국적기업 최고경영자의 윤리적 가치관이 기업성과에 미치는 영향", 국제경영연구, 17(1), pp.69~90 (2006), 한국국제경영학회
  6. 최성진, "The Relationship Between Ownership Structure and Inter-Organizational Strategies: An Empirical Analysis", 국제경영연구, 22(3), pp.65~88 (2011), 한국국제경영학회
  7. Agudo, J. M, "Measuring corporative social performance in firms : a Bayesian factor analysis approach", Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(3), pp.638~659 (2015)
  8. Arulampalam, W, "Aninvestigation into the givings by largecorporate donors to UK. charities, 1979~1986", Applied Economics, 27, pp.935~945 (1995)
  9. Barker, V. L, "Organizational cause and strategicconsequences of the extent of topmanagement team replacementduringturnaround attempts", Journal of ManagementStudies, 38(2), pp.235~269 (2001)
  10. Barnea, A, "Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders", Journal of Business Ethics, 97, pp.71~86 (2010)
  11. Bliss, M. A, "Does CEO duality constrain board independence? Some evidence from audit fee", Accounting and Finance, 51, pp.361~380 (2011)
  12. Brammer, S, "The development of corporate charitable contributions in the UK : A stakeholder analysis", Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), pp.1411~1434 (2004)
  13. Brown, W. O, "Corporate philanthropy practices", Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, pp.855~877 (2006)
  14. Bruch, H, "The keys to rethinking corporate philanthropy", MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), pp.49~55 (2005)
  15. Buchinsky, M, "Recent advances in quantile regression models : A practical guide for empirical research", Journal of Human Resources, 22(1), pp.88~126 (1998)
  16. Campbell, D, "Corporate philanthropy in the U. K. 1985~2000 : Some empirical findings", Journal of Business Ethics, 39, pp.29~41 (2002)
  17. Cannella, A. A. Jr, "Succession as a sociopolitical process : Internal impediments to outsider selection", Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), pp.763~793 (1993)
  18. Cannella, A. A. Jr, "So close and yet so far : Promotion versus exit for CEO heirs apparent", Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), pp.69~88 (2001)
  19. Carroll, A. B, "The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational Stakeholders", Business Horizons, ~ (1979)
  20. Chang, J. J, "Governance system effectiveness following the crisis : The case of Korean business group headquarters", Corporate governance : an international review, 14(2), pp.85~97 (2006)
  21. Cheah, E. T, "Drivers of corporate socialresponsibility attitudes : The demographyof socially responsible investors", British Journal of Management, 22(2), pp.305~323 (2011)
  22. Cleveland, W. S, "Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots", Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, pp.829~836 (1979)
  23. Fama, E. F, "Risk, return, and equilibrium : Empirical tests", The Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), pp.607~636 (1973)
  24. Finkelstein, S, "Strategic leadership: Theoryand research on executives, top managementteams, and boards" (2009), OxfordUniversityPress
  25. Friedman, M, "The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits", New York Times Magazine, 13, pp.122~126 (1970)
  26. Galaskiewicz, J, "An urban grants economyrevisited : Corporate charitable contributionsin the twin cities, 1979~1981, 1987~1989", Administrative ScienceQuarterly, 42, pp.445~471 (1997)
  27. Galbreath, J, "Drivers of corporate social responsibility : The role of formal strategic planning and firm culture", British Journal of Management, 21(2), pp.511~525 (2010)
  28. Gardberg, N. A, "Corporate citizenship : Creating intangible assets across institutional environments", Academy of Management Review, 34, pp.329~346 (2006)
  29. Giambatista, R. C, "Nothing succeeds like succession : Acritical review of leader succession literaturesince 1994", The LeadershipQuarterly, 16(6), pp.963~991 (2005)
  30. Godfrey, P. C, "The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth : A risk management perspective", Academy of Management Review, 30, pp.777~798 (2005)
  31. Gove, S, "Dummy constructs? Binomial categorical variables as representations of constructs : CEO duality through time", Organizational Research Methods, 16, pp.100~126 (2013)
  32. Haynes, K. T, "The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change", Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), pp.1145~1163 (2010)
  33. Horner, S. V, "Board power, CEO appointments and CEO duality", Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), pp.43~58 (2010)
  34. Huang, S. K, "The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate sustainable development", Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), pp.234~244 (2013)
  35. Hyun, J. H, "The Effects of Corporate Governance, Competition, and Political Costs on Strategic Executive Pay Disclosure : Evidence from Korea", Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), pp.195~220 (2014)
  36. Iyengar, R. J, "Self-selection, endogeneity, and the relationship between CEO duality and firm performance", Strategic Management Journal, 30, pp.1092~1112 (2009)
  37. Jensen, M. C, "Theory of the firm : Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure", Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), pp.305~360 (1976)
  38. Joh, S. W, "Corporate governance and firm profitability : evidence from Korea before the economic crisis", Journal of Financial Economics, 68(2), pp.287~322 (2003)
  39. Kesner, I. F, "Executive succession : Past, present and future", Journal of Management, 20(2), pp.327~372 (1994)
  40. Khan, A, "Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures : Evidence from an emerging economy", Journal of Business Ethics, 114, pp.207~223 (2013)
  41. Kim, K, "Deep structures in CEO dualityfirm performance linkage", International Management Review, 9(2), pp.11~23 (2013)
  42. Koenker, R, "Regression quantiles", Econometrica, 46(1), pp.33~50 (1978)
  43. Krause, R, "CEO duality : A review and researchagenda", Journal of Management, 40(1), pp.256~286 (2014)
  44. Lattemann, C, "CSR communicationintensity in Chinese and Indianmultinational companies", CorporateGovernance : An International Review, 17(4), pp.426~442 (2009)
  45. Lev, B, "Is doing good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth", Strategic Management Journal, 31, pp.182~200 (2010)
  46. Li, J, "Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structure in UK firms", Accounting and Business Research, 38(2), pp.137~159 (2008)
  47. Maignan, I, "Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US : Insights from businesses self-presentations", Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), pp.497~514 (2002)
  48. Maloney, M. T, "Managerial decision makingand capital structure", Journal ofBusiness, 66(2), pp.189~217 (1993)
  49. Manner, M. H, "The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate social performance", Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), pp.53~72 (2010)
  50. Muller, A, "Doing good deeds in times of need : A strategic perspective on corporate disaster donations", Strategic Management Journal, 32, pp.911~929 (2011)
  51. Oh, W. Y, "The effect of ownership structure on corporate social responsibility : Empirical evidence from Korea", Journal of Business Ethics, 104(2), pp.283~297 (2011)
  52. Orlitzky, M, "Corporate social and financial performance : A meta-analysis", Organization Studies, 24(3), pp.403~441 (2003)
  53. Patten, D. M, "Does the market value corporatephilanthropy? Evidence fromthe response to the 2004 tsunami reliefeffort", Journal of Business Ethics, 81, pp.599~607 (2008)
  54. Ramdani, D, "The impact of board independence and CEO duality on firm performance : A quantile regression analysis for Indonesia, Malaysia, South Korea and Thailand", British Journal of Management, 21(3), pp.607~627 (2010)
  55. Rechner, P. L, "CEO duality and organizational performance : A longitudinal analysis", Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), pp.155~160 (1991)
  56. Schnietz, K. E, "Exploring the financial value of a reputation for corporate social responsibility during a crisis", Corporate Reputation Re view, 7(4), pp.327~345 (2005)
  57. Seifert, B, "Comparing big givers and small givers : Financial correlates of corporate philanthropy", Journal of Business Ethics, 45, pp.195~211 (2003)
  58. Seifert, B, "Having, giving, and getting : Slack resources, corporate philanthropy, and firm financial performance", Business and Society, 43, pp.135~161 (2004)
  59. Shen, W, "Revisiting the performance consequences of CEO succession : The impacts of successor type, postsuccession senior executive turnover, and departing CEO tenure", Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), pp.717~733 (2002)
  60. Shen, W, "The dynamics of the CEO-board relationship : An evolutionary perspective", Academy of Management Review, 28(3), pp.466~476 (2003)
  61. Simsek, Z, "CEO tenure and organizational performance: Testing a non-linear intervening model", Academy of Management Proceeding, ~ (2004)
  62. Waldman, D. A, "Theoretical and practitioner letters : Defining the socially responsible leader", Leadership Quarterly, 19, pp.117~131 (2008)
  63. Wang, H, "Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance : The roles of stakeholder response and political access", Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), pp.1159~1181 (2011)
  64. Wang, H, "Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance", Organization Science, 19(1), pp.143~159 (2008)
  65. Wu, S, "CEO tenure and company invention under differing levels of technological dynamism", Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), pp.859~873 (2005)
  66. Wulfson, M, "The ethics of corporate social responsibility and philanthropic ventures", Journal of Business Ethics, 29, pp.135~145 (2001)
  67. Zajac, E. J, "Who shall succeed? How CEO", board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs, 1996, pp.39(1), 64~90
  68. Zhang, R, "Corporate philanthropic disaster response and ownership type : Evidence from Chinese firms' response to the Sichuan earthquake", Journal of Business Ethics, 91, pp.51~63 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

The Control–Ownership Wedge and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Korean Business Groups (Chaebols)유혜영, 조문경, 채수준사람과세계경영학회 · Global Business and Finance Review2017 · 제22권 제4호Impact of Controlling Shareholders on Corporate Social Responsibility under External Financial Constraints박경서, 변희섭, 이지혜경영연구소 · Seoul Journal of Business2015 · 제21권 제2호The Effect of the Owner CEO on the Relation between CEO Compensation and Firm Performance: Korean CaseInshik Seol, Sun-A Kang, Yong-Shik Kim사람과세계경영학회 · Global Business and Finance Review2018 · 제23권 제3호The Impacts of CEO Job Security and Long-term Incentives on U.S. Firms’ Corporate Social Responsibility*김현도한국국제경영학회 · 국제경영연구2023 · 제34권 제4호CEO 재임 기간이 기업의 사회적 책임 활동(CSR)에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구김정훈, 서정일한국윤리경영학회 · 윤리경영연구2021 · 제21권 제1호Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Constraints: Evidence from Korean Firms곽영민, 최석봉사람과세계경영학회 · Global Business and Finance Review2015 · 제20권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)

혁신기업, 테슬라 모터스의 패러독스 경영정진섭, 이민재pp. 1-24기업의 온실가스 배출로 인한 재무성과 하락과 기업 지배구조의 조절적 역할에 관한 연구김성훈, 노태우, 김주태pp. 25-52Chinese MNCs as Risk Avoiders in Cross-Border Acquisition: Host Country Choices by Chinese MNCs, 1992~2008신동엽, 노그림pp. 53-78
원문 보기