본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

담화표지화의 정도성에 대한 한 논의 - ‘뭐, 어디, 왜’를 대상으로 -

A Study about Degrees of Becoming Discourse Marker

2

조회

0

다운로드

24

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The Development as discourse markers is one of grammatical- izations. But developing as discourse markers has differences in levels of formal fixation and retaining it's original meaning. In this paper, we examined that there are differences in degrees of grammaticalization in interrogatives which seems to have similar courses of grammatical- ization, by focusing on Korean interrogatives ‘mueo(뭐), eodi(어디), wae(왜)’. As a result, in the degrees of the development of Korean interrogatives as discourse marker, ‘mueo(뭐)’ was the most advanced one, and the following one was ‘eodi(어디)’. The least advanced one between these three to develop as a discourse marker was ‘wae(왜)’. So, we should realize that some of the discourse markers has differences in degrees of grammaticalization and their peculiarities, and also inquire about the peculiarities and furthermore establish the identity of the discourse marker.

Abstract

The Development as discourse markers is one of grammatical- izations. But developing as discourse markers has differences in levels of formal fixation and retaining it's original meaning. In this paper, we examined that there are differences in degrees of grammaticalization in interrogatives which seems to have similar courses of grammatical- ization, by focusing on Korean interrogatives ‘mueo(뭐), eodi(어디), wae(왜)’. As a result, in the degrees of the development of Korean interrogatives as discourse marker, ‘mueo(뭐)’ was the most advanced one, and the following one was ‘eodi(어디)’. The least advanced one between these three to develop as a discourse marker was ‘wae(왜)’. So, we should realize that some of the discourse markers has differences in degrees of grammaticalization and their peculiarities, and also inquire about the peculiarities and furthermore establish the identity of the discourse marker.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. "구어 담화에서의 ‘그래 가지고’의 의미", 16, pp.1~21 (2005), 한국어의미학회
  2. "소설 "태백산맥"의 화용론 -담화 표지 ‘와, 웨, 잉’을 중심으로", 57, pp.5~31 (2006), 한국언어문학회
  3. "담화표지 ‘뭐’의 문법화와 담화 기능", 35, pp.5~32 (2000), 국어문학회
  4. "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
  5. "국어 의문사의 담화표지화", 12(2), pp.41~63 (2005), 담화인지언어학회
  6. "국어 의문사 ‘무슨’의 담화표지 기능", 13(2), pp.21~42 (2006), 담화인지언어학회
  7. "담화 표지의 습득과 발달", 118, pp.149~180 (2005), 한국어교육학회
  8. "{왜}의 화용 기능", 6, pp.1~26 (2000), 한국어의미학회
  9. "담화표지되기와 문법화", 26, pp.61~80 (2002), 우리말글학회
  10. "외국인을 위한 한국어 학습 사전" (2004), 문화관광부 한국어세계화재단
  11. "{-요} 쓰임의 구조와 기능", 16(2), pp.361~389 (1991), 한국언어학회
  12. "한국어 담화 표지어 ‘왜’", 4(1), pp.1~20 (1997), 담화인지언어학회
  13. "한국어 담화 표지어 ‘뭐’의 의미", 6(1), pp.137~157 (1999), 담화인지언어학회
  14. "한국어학습자의 중간언어 연구" (2005), 커뮤니케이션북스
  15. "담화 표지 ‘뭐냐 있지’에 대하여", 56, pp.51~68 (1995), 한국어문학회
  16. "국어 담화표지 {인자}에 대한 연구", 2, pp.1~20 (1996), 담화인지언어학회
  17. "한국어 담화 표지의 특징 연구", 4, pp.113~145 (2002), 한국화법학회
  18. "국어 의문사 ‘뭐’의 의미 분석", 35, pp.109~131 (2005), 겨레어문학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)