본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

更改关键词搜索结果行为的违法性认定研究

Research on Illegality Identification of the Act of Altering Key Word Searching Results

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

更改关键词搜索结果行为损害了其他市场主体的合法权益、侵犯了互联网用户的知情权与自主选择权、破坏了互联网市场竞争秩序,对其进行规制已刻不容缓. 但适用传统不正当竞争行为认定方法对此类行为的违法性进行认定时,在认定理念、认定标准、认定依据方面均遭遇困境. 破解困境,可从以下路径着手:坚持优先保护市场竞争秩序、多元化利益协调保护的认定理念,确立以竞争机制标准为核心的认定标准,完善法律法规依据、增强行业惯例效力. 近年来,以关键词搜索为载体实施的互联网新型不正当竞争行为大大增加,这些行为的出现,危害极其严重,不仅损害了其他竞争者的合法权益,还侵犯了互联网用户的合法权益,对互联网市场的竞争秩序造成了严重破坏. 作为一种互联网新型不正当竞争行为,更改关键词搜索结果行为无论在行为构成还是实施机制上,均与传统的不正当竞争行为存在较大差异,导致实务部门适用传统不正当竞争行为认定方法对此类行为进行违法性认定时,遭遇诸多困境. 由于该类行为出现时间较短、形式较新,理论界尚未进行深入系统的研究,也未对司法实践提出有益的建议,鉴此,本文试图从行为违法性认定的视角进行深入系统的研究,以期对司法实践有所裨益.

Abstract

The act of altering key word searching results demands urgent regulation for it has damaged the legitimate rights and interests of other market players, infringed upon the internet users’ right to know and freedom of choice, and disrupted the order of competition on the internet. However, identification of the illegality of such act by applying traditional means of identifying unfair competition act would encounter predicament in terms of philosophy, standard and basis for identification. It is thus suggested that the following routes may be followed: insisting on the identification philosophy of giving priority to the protecton of the order of market competition and coordinated protection of pluralistic interests, establishing the identification standard of taking the competition mechanism as its core, improving legal basis, and increasing the influence of industry practice. In recent years, the substantial increase of new type of unfair competition over the internet by the use of key word searching has not only harmed the legitimate rights and interests of other competitors, but also infringed upon the legitimate rights and interests of net-users, seriously damaging the order of competition on the internet. As a new kind of unfair competition on the internet, altering key word searching results is quite different from traditional unfair competition practices in terms of both elements of act and its implementation mechanism, which has rendered the agencies in practice confronted with many predicaments in applying the traditional means of unfair competition identification to the illegality identification of such acts. Due to its new presence and form, the theoretical circles have not yet carried out in-depth and systematic research, nor put forward any useful suggestions for judicial practice. In view of this, this paper attempts to conduct an in-depth and systematic research from the perspective of illegality identification, and hopefully it will help judicial practice.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 孙晋, "竞争法原论" (2011), 武汉大学出版社
  2. 曲凌刚, "互联网行业不正当竞争案件审理研究", 现代电信科技, (11) (2014)
  3. 郭振华, "公共利益视野下的网络搜索侵权行为对策分析-以搜索引擎侵害知识产权信息为视角", 法学杂志, (1) (2011)
  4. 李生龙, "互联网领域公认商业道德研究", 法律适用, (9) (2015)
  5. 谢晓尧, "竞争秩序的道德解读" (2005), 法律出版社
  6. 杨豹, "改革创新的时代精神在当代中国的意义", 学术论坛, (4) (2010)
  7. 余景美, "网络上不正当竞争行为的法律适用与立法完善", 经济师, (6) (2004)
  8. 吴水兰, "从行业惯例的角度分析robots协议的司法约束-由3B大战引发的思考", 青年与社会, (8) (2013)
  9. 吴灿新, "道德发展变化的基本形态-道德流变、道德演变与道德交易", 学术研究, (2) (2011)
  10. 王先林, "论反不正当竞争法调整范围的扩展——我国《反不正当竞争法》第2条的完善", 中国社会科学院研究生院学报, (6) (2010)
  11. 王艳芳, "《反不正当竞争法》在互联网不正当竞争案件中的适用", 法律适用, (7) (2014)
  12. 蒋舸, "《反不正当竞争法》一般条款在互联网领域的适用", 电子知识产权, (4) (2014)
  13. 蒋舸, "反不正当竞争法一般条款在互联网领域的适用——以robots协议案一审判决为视角", 电子知识产权, (10) (2014)
  14. 张江莉, "互联网平台竞争与反垄断规制——以3Q反垄断诉讼为视角", 中外法学, (1) (2015)
  15. 张素伦, "互联网不正当竞争行为的判定应引入消费者权益因素", 电子知识产权, (4) (2014)
  16. 张占江, "不正当竞争行为认定的逻辑与标准", 电子知识产权, (11) (2013)
  17. 张平, "《反不正当竞争法》的一般条款及其适用——搜索引擎爬虫协议引发的思考", 法律适用, (3) (2013)
  18. 郑友德, "反不正当竞争法一般条款具体化研究", 法商研究, (5) (2005)
  19. 朱理, "互联网领域竞争行为的法律边界:挑战与司法回应", 竞争政策研究, (1) (2015)
  20. 陈春龙, "中国司法解释的地位与功能", 中国法学, (1) (2003)
  21. 肖冉, "搜索引擎竞价排名的法律规制研究", 新学术, (5) (2007)
  22. 叶明, "我国互联网弹出式广告的法律规制困境及其对策研究", 经济法论坛, (2) (2014)
  23. 黄勇, "论互联网不正当竞争的‘新边界’", 电子知识产权, (1) (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)