『한말연구』의 일반언어학 연구 동향과 앞으로의 과제
General linguistic trends in the articles of Hanmal-yeongu
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
his review article provides a brief historical sketch of general linguistic trends of the articles which have been published in Hanmal-yeongu from 2005 to March in 2016. A total of 481 papers have been published during that period, and among them only 10 articles directly deals with the issues of general linguistics. We compared the journal with other 3 journals, which have similar characteristics. They include Hangeul (727 articles), Kwukehak (685 articels), Hankwukehak (861 articles) and Wulimal Yenkwu (425 articles). The results of analysis based upon comparison of the bibliographies in each articles shows that foreign and/or general linguistic theories have had less influence on Hanmal-yeongu than other three journals, and the authors of the journal have cited fewer foreign articles than the ones of the other journals. In addition, the results reveals that research methodology adopted by the authors looks simpler. In that respect, new direction for future research is proposed based on the presented inadequacies of the existing research papers in the view point of general linguistics.
Abstract
his review article provides a brief historical sketch of general linguistic trends of the articles which have been published in Hanmal-yeongu from 2005 to March in 2016. A total of 481 papers have been published during that period, and among them only 10 articles directly deals with the issues of general linguistics. We compared the journal with other 3 journals, which have similar characteristics. They include Hangeul (727 articles), Kwukehak (685 articels), Hankwukehak (861 articles) and Wulimal Yenkwu (425 articles). The results of analysis based upon comparison of the bibliographies in each articles shows that foreign and/or general linguistic theories have had less influence on Hanmal-yeongu than other three journals, and the authors of the journal have cited fewer foreign articles than the ones of the other journals. In addition, the results reveals that research methodology adopted by the authors looks simpler. In that respect, new direction for future research is proposed based on the presented inadequacies of the existing research papers in the view point of general linguistics.
참고문헌 (12)
- 권재일, "21세기 국어학 연구의 새로운 방향", 대구어문론총, 15, pp.23~36 (1997)
- 김건희, "언어유형론 개관과 국어 연구", 한말연구, (34), pp.5~44 (2014), 한말연구학회
- 김미형, "한·영 완곡어의 대조 분석", 한말연구, (25), pp.61~112 (2009), 한말연구학회
- 김희경, "단어 형성에 관한 대조 연구", 한말연구, (26), pp.87~108 (2010), 한말연구학회
- 이성하, "의미적 구체성과 문법화: 범언어적 사례 연구", 한말연구, 7, pp.224~248 (2000), 한말연구학회
- 전정례, "한국어와 일본어의 문법변화 비교 연구", 한말연구, 4, pp.266~282 (1998), 한말연구학회
- 전정례, "언어는 왜, 어떻게 변화하는가", 한말연구, (19), pp.347~369 (2006), 한말연구학회
- 전정례, "언어와 문화", 한말연구, (24), pp.195~217 (2009), 한말연구학회
- 전정예, "유형론적 관점에서 본 한국어와 중국어의 어순 비교", 한말연구, (32), pp.177~211 (2013), 한말연구학회
- 정영주, "살라어의 토씨 연구(1)", 한말연구, 1, pp.162~204 (1995), 한말연구학회
- 정영주, "살라어의 토씨 연구(2)", 한말연구, 2, pp.159~230 (1996), 한말연구학회
- 허웅, "중세국어 연구" (1963), 정음사
