中韩民事诉讼法撤诉制度比较研究
A Comparative Study on the withdrawal system in Civil Procedure Law of China and of Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
长期以来, 中国民事诉讼法带有浓厚的国家干预主义色彩, 在撤诉制度方面严格限制当事人的处分权. 但2015年2月4日, 中国最高人民法院颁布≪最高人民法院关于适用<中华人民共和国民事诉讼法>的解释≫, 开始在撤诉方面引入当事人处分权, 但与韩国相比仍存在较大差异. 如果说韩国在民事诉讼方面实行的是当事人处分权主义, 则中国实行的是具有当事人处分权色彩的国家干预主义.
Abstract
For a long time, the civil procedural law of China with a strong national interventionist, severely limited the disposition right of the parties in the withdrawal system. But on February 4, 2015, China’s Supreme People's Court promulgated < The Judicial Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on the Application of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China >, in which introduced Party's disposition right in the withdrawal system for the first time. But the withdraw system in China is still very different from that in Korea. About the withdrawal system, if the party's disposition right is completely accepted in civil procedure law of Korea, then it is only partly accepted in civil procedure law of China with the implementation of the national interventionist.
참고문헌 (15)
- 孙汉琦, "중국민사소송법의 원리와 해석" (2014), 弘文社
- 孙汉琦, "韩国民事诉讼法导论" (2010), 中国法制出版社
- 이재성, "본소의 각하와 반소취하의 동의의 여부", 사법행정, 26(9)
- 송태석, "항소의 취하", 고시계, (10) (2004)
- 杜万华, "最高人民法院民事诉讼法司法解释实务指南" (2015), 中国法制出版社
- 江伟, "民事诉讼法专论" (2005), 中国人民大学出版社
- 柴发邦, "民事诉讼法学新编" (1992), 法律出版社
- 江伟, "中国民事诉讼法教程" (1990), 中国人民大学出版社
- 马原, "<民事诉讼法适用意见>释疑" (1994), 中国检察院出版社
- 梁书文, "民事诉讼法适用意见新释" (2002), 中国法制出版社
- 严仁群, "二审和解后的法理逻辑：评第一批指导案例之‘吴梅案’", 中国法学, (4) (2012)
- 曾耀林, "二审中经双方当事人同意, 原审原告的起诉可与上诉人的上诉一并撤回", 人民司法, (8) (2013)
- "论原告在二审中撤回一审起诉之合法性"[URL]
- "论原告在二审中撤回一审起诉之合法性"[URL]
- "论民事二审程序中原告无权撤回起诉"[URL]