본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Polysemous Words in English Movies, Learning Obstacles or Gifted Talent?

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The purpose of this paper is twofold: (1) to investigate how L2 learners deal with polysemous words or phrases without instruction about polysemy and (2) to observe what alternatives L2 learners have instead of instruction. In this paper, a case study was administered with three advanced college students. The material was an American movie, Café Society (Allen, 2016). All participants were tested three times with mostly polysemous words and phrases. It was found in the first test that the participants depended heavily on context to decide which senses of polysemous words were appropriate. The second test showed that the participants failed to handle the context because it was too difficult for them. In the third test, participants often misjudged the context and consequently made wrong choices among several senses. The results of the tests indicate that context is key to dealing with polysemous words or phrases. The pedagogical implication is that L2 students need context to deal with polysemous words or phrases. Teachers must instruct about the context. Image schemas and conceptual metaphors are only products of the interaction between context and polysemous words.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is twofold: (1) to investigate how L2 learners deal with polysemous words or phrases without instruction about polysemy and (2) to observe what alternatives L2 learners have instead of instruction. In this paper, a case study was administered with three advanced college students. The material was an American movie, Café Society (Allen, 2016). All participants were tested three times with mostly polysemous words and phrases. It was found in the first test that the participants depended heavily on context to decide which senses of polysemous words were appropriate. The second test showed that the participants failed to handle the context because it was too difficult for them. In the third test, participants often misjudged the context and consequently made wrong choices among several senses. The results of the tests indicate that context is key to dealing with polysemous words or phrases. The pedagogical implication is that L2 students need context to deal with polysemous words or phrases. Teachers must instruct about the context. Image schemas and conceptual metaphors are only products of the interaction between context and polysemous words.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. Abou-Khalil, V., "Learning isolated polysemous words:Identifying the intended meaning of language learners in informal ubiquitous language learning environments", Smart Learning Environments, 6(13) (2019)[DOI]
  2. Allen, W, "Café society", Gravier Productions, ~ (2016)
  3. Bielak, J., "Extending the boundaries of research on second language learning and teaching", pp.241~261 (2011), Springer
  4. Boers, F., "Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary : Assessment and integration", Language Teaching, 46(2), pp.208~224 (2013)[DOI]
  5. Croft, W., "Cognitive linguistics" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  6. Csábi, S., "Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching", pp.233~256 (2004), De Gruyter Mouton
  7. Cuyckens, H., "Polysemy in cognitive linguistics: Selected papers from the fifth international cognitive linguistics conference", pp.ix~xxvii (1997), John Benjamins
  8. Daiu, S., "The main features of semantic approach of polysemy", Journal of Educational and Social Research, 5(3), pp.169~173 (2015)[DOI]
  9. Evans, V., "Cognitive linguistics: An introduction" (2006), Edinburgh University Press
  10. Evans, V., "Applying cognitive linguistics to pedagogical grammar : The English preposition of verticality", Revista Brasileira de Linguistica Aplicada, 5(2), pp.11~42 (2005)[DOI]
  11. A pragmatic solution to the polysemy paradox, "Falkum, I. L.", UCL, 27~54, pp.UCL working papers in linguistics, 21 (2009)
  12. Falkum, I. L, "The semantics and pragmatics of polysemy: A relevance-theoretic account", Doctoral, pp.2011
  13. Falkum, I. L., "The how and why of polysemy : A pragmatic account", Lingua, 157, pp.83~99 (2015)[DOI]
  14. Falkum, I. L., "Polysemy : Current perspectives and approaches", Lingua, 157, pp.1~16 (2015)[DOI]
  15. Faniran, K. F., "A critical study of polysemy: A perspective of French language and its parts of speech", International Journal of Advanced Academic Research, 2016, pp.2(7), 7~18
  16. Goldenberg, E. R, "The role of context in early language development", Doctoral, pp.2015
  17. Gries, S. Th., "Handbook of cognitive linguistics", pp.472~490 (2015), De Gruyter Mouton
  18. Hoff, E., "How social contexts support and shape language development", Developmental Review, 26(1), pp.55~88 (2006)[DOI]
  19. Holme, R., "Cognitive linguistics and the second language classroom", TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), pp.6~29 (2012)[DOI]
  20. Jager, B., "Polysemy advantage with abstract but not concrete words", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(1), pp.143~156 (2016)[DOI]
  21. 기호연, "양방향 LSTM을 적용한 단어의미 중의성 해소 감정분석", 한국빅데이터학회 학회지, 5(1), pp.197~208 (2020), 사)한국빅데이터학회[DOI]
  22. Kovács, É., "Polysemy in traditional vs. cognitive linguistics", Eger Journal of English Studies, 11, pp.3~19 (2011)
  23. Kovács, É., "The role of context in polysemy", Romanian Journal of English Studies, 9(1), pp.60~69 (2013)[DOI]
  24. Lakoff, G., "Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind" (1987), The University of Chicago Press
  25. Lakoff, G., "Metaphors we live by. Chicago" (1980), University of Chicago Press
  26. Langacker, R. W., "Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites" (1987), Stanford University Press
  27. Langacker, R. W., "Review of George Lakoff : Women, fire, and dangerous things : What categories reveal about the mind", Language, 64(2), pp.384~395 (1988)[DOI]
  28. Lewis, M., "The lexical approach" (1993), Language Teaching Publications
  29. Littlemore, J., "Applying cognitive linguistics to second language learning and teaching" (2009), Palgrave Macmillan
  30. Littlemore, J., "Introduction to the interplay between cognitive linguistics and second language learning and teaching", AILA Review, 23(1), pp.1~6 (2010)[DOI]
  31. Makni, F., "Applying cognitive linguistics to teaching polysemous vocabulary", Arab World English Journal, 5(1), pp.4~20 (2014)
  32. Matsumoto, N, "Applying cognitive grammar to pedagogical grammar: The case of “To”", Proceedings of the 11th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, pp.116~130 (2006), Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics
  33. Mitsugi, M., "The effectiveness of core meaning based instruction on preposition choice", Research Bulletin of English Teaching, 10, pp.1~25 (2013)
  34. Makoto Mitsugi, "Schema-Based Instruction on Learning English Polysemous Words: Effects of Instruction and Learners’ Perceptions", Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 21(1), pp.21~43 (2017), 범태평양 응용언어학회
  35. Moudraia, O, "Lexical approach to second language teaching. ERIC digest", ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED455698), ~ (2001)
  36. Nemoianu, A. M, "Review of the book The lexical approach", TESL-EJ, 1(2) (1994)
  37. Nerlich, B., "Polysemy:Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language", pp.49~76 (2003), De Gruyter Mouton
  38. "Types of Context"[URL]
  39. Ravin, Y., "Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches", pp.1~29 (2000), Oxford University Press
  40. Rowe, M. L., "Language development in context", Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 2, pp.201~223 (2020)[DOI]
  41. "Polysemy"[URL]
  42. Selivan, L., "Lexical grammar: Activities for teaching chunks and exploring patterns" (2018), Cambridge University Press
  43. Taylor, J. R., "Cognitive grammar" (2002), Oxford University
  44. Tremblay, C., "The role of polysemy on metaphor comprehension processing : The example of Parkinson’s disease", Journal of Neurolinguistics, 30, pp.1~13 (2014)[DOI]
  45. Tyler, A., "Applying cognitive linguistics to learning the semantics of English to, for, and at : An experimental investigation", Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), pp.181~205 (2011)
  46. Ullmann, S., "The principles of semantics: A linguistic approach to meaning" (1959), Blackwell
  47. Vardidze, T., "The impact of teaching English polysemy through similarity-based approach", Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 5(2), pp.112~125 (2020)[DOI]
  48. Veliz, L., "A route to the teaching of polysemous lexicon : Benefits from cognitive linguistics and conceptual metaphor theory", International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 7(1), pp.211~217 (2018)[DOI]
  49. Vicente, A., "Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics" (2017)
  50. Wei, X., "A study of word meaning acquisition of polysemous words for English majors", Creative Education, 6, pp.1993~2001 (2015)[DOI]
  51. Willis, D., "The lexical syllabus: The lexical approach to language teaching" (1990), Collins

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)