본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

短视频版权保护的困境与出路

Problem and Solution of Short Video Copyright Protection

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

As a product of digital network environment, short video has property attribute, which makes it have reasonable basis protected by copyright law. To explore the legal basis of short video protected by copyright law is actually to explore whether it can be protected as a work. This issue is the focus of copyright infringement cases of short video, and the premise of infringement determination. Infringement only happens when short video is regarded as a work. The key to determine whether short video is a work is to determine its originality. There has been a dispute over the criterion of originality identification in Chinese academic circles. At present, the general principle of originality identification in China’s judicial practice is “independent creation plus intellectual creation”. Since short video varies in contents and forms of expression, special standards of originality identification should be adopted, which means that the creativity should be determined to different degrees under the premise of independent creation. Therefore, constructing a criterion of creativity identification combining both general and specific principles offers scientific protection for short video copyright. As for whether short video works can be reasonably used, China preferred to adopt a combination method of “three-step test” and “four-element standard”, among which “four-element standard” is majorly used and supplemented by “three-step test”. “Three-step test” is stipulated in Article 21 of the “Implementation Regulations of the Copyright Law” of China, which has the following statements, being restricted to special cases; not affecting normal use of the work; not harming the interests of the copyright owners in the process of use. “Four-element standard” is stipulated in the US Copyright Act, which stands for the purpose and nature of use, the nature of the work to be used, the quantity and quality of the part used compared to the whole work used, the effect of use on the potential market or value of copyrighted works. Since both of them have their own advantages and limitations, in order to provide more comprehensive protection for short video works, this paper proposed to identify the standard of short video’s fair use by combining these two methods. In addition, in terms of protection methods, short video platform should take the following measures, making fair use of the exemption rules, the “safe haven” system; executing duty of reasonable care by using technical thinking and introducing copyright filtering mechanism; following the “Network Short Video Platform Management Specification” issued by China Network Audiovisual Program Service Association; improving copyright awareness of short video creators as well as the quality of works; improving the technical protection measures in terms of legislation.

Abstract

As a product of digital network environment, short video has property attribute, which makes it have reasonable basis protected by copyright law. To explore the legal basis of short video protected by copyright law is actually to explore whether it can be protected as a work. This issue is the focus of copyright infringement cases of short video, and the premise of infringement determination. Infringement only happens when short video is regarded as a work. The key to determine whether short video is a work is to determine its originality. There has been a dispute over the criterion of originality identification in Chinese academic circles. At present, the general principle of originality identification in China’s judicial practice is “independent creation plus intellectual creation”. Since short video varies in contents and forms of expression, special standards of originality identification should be adopted, which means that the creativity should be determined to different degrees under the premise of independent creation. Therefore, constructing a criterion of creativity identification combining both general and specific principles offers scientific protection for short video copyright. As for whether short video works can be reasonably used, China preferred to adopt a combination method of “three-step test” and “four-element standard”, among which “four-element standard” is majorly used and supplemented by “three-step test”. “Three-step test” is stipulated in Article 21 of the “Implementation Regulations of the Copyright Law” of China, which has the following statements, being restricted to special cases; not affecting normal use of the work; not harming the interests of the copyright owners in the process of use. “Four-element standard” is stipulated in the US Copyright Act, which stands for the purpose and nature of use, the nature of the work to be used, the quantity and quality of the part used compared to the whole work used, the effect of use on the potential market or value of copyrighted works. Since both of them have their own advantages and limitations, in order to provide more comprehensive protection for short video works, this paper proposed to identify the standard of short video’s fair use by combining these two methods. In addition, in terms of protection methods, short video platform should take the following measures, making fair use of the exemption rules, the “safe haven” system; executing duty of reasonable care by using technical thinking and introducing copyright filtering mechanism; following the “Network Short Video Platform Management Specification” issued by China Network Audiovisual Program Service Association; improving copyright awareness of short video creators as well as the quality of works; improving the technical protection measures in terms of legislation.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 雷炳德, "著作权法" (2005), 法律出版社
  2. 姜福晓, "数字网络技术背景下著作权法的困境与出路" (2017), 知识产权出版社
  3. 孔祥俊, "网络著作权保护法律理念与裁判方法" (2015), 中国法制出版社
  4. 李明德, "美国知识产权法" (2003), 法律出版社
  5. 李明德, "《著作权法》专家建议稿说明" (2012), 法律出版社
  6. 李响, "美国版权法:原则、案例及材料" (2004), 中国政法大学出版社
  7. 范长军, "德国著作权法" (2013), 知识产权出版社
  8. 吴汉东, "知识产权法" (2014), 北京大学出版社
  9. 王迁, "知识产权法教程" (2016), 中国人民大学出版社
  10. 姚鹤徽, "数字网络时代著作权保护模式研究" (2018), 中国人民大学出版社
  11. 韦之, "知识产权论" (2002), 知识产权出版社
  12. 周翼, "挑战知识产权--自由软件运动的经济学研究" (2010), 格致出版社, 上海人民出版社
  13. 曾琳, "著作权法第三次修正下的“限制与例外”制度应用研究" (2016), 中国政法大学出版社
  14. 姜颖, "作品独创性判定标准的比较研究", 知识产权, (3) (2004)
  15. 金渝林, "论作品的独创性", 法学研究, (4) (1995)
  16. 李伟文, "论著作权客体之独创性", 法学评论, (1) (2000)
  17. 李琛, "短视频产业对著作权保护的可能性影响", 中国版权, (4) (2017)
  18. 李欢, "短视频发展中的生态建设问题研究—以梨视频为例", pp.2018
  19. 徐晶, "短视频著作权问题研究", pp.2017
  20. 孙飞, "短视频著作权保护问题研究", 电子知识产权, (5) (2018)
  21. 王迁, "论认定“模仿讽刺作品”构成“合理使用”的法律规则—兼评《一个馒头引发的血案》涉及的著作权问题", 科技与法律, (1) (2006)
  22. 王骁, "从“X分钟带你看完电影”系列看戏仿作品和合理使用", 新闻界, (8) (2017)
  23. 袁锋, "网络影评类短视频合理使用问题研究—以转换性使用为视角", 中国出版, (3) (2019)
  24. 朱迪齐, "短视频版权问题及平台应对措施", 科技传播, (8) (2018)
  25. 陈秉训, "电影评论与著作权合理使用—兼评“谷阿莫”评论影片之使用", 云林科技大学科技法学论丛, (11) (2017)
  26. 汤辰敏, "视频聚合平台的著作权直接侵权认定", 电信网技术 (2017)
  27. 冯晓青, "试论著作权法中作品独创性的界定", 华东政法学院学报, (5) (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)