韩中货物多式联运相关法律体系及问题的考察
Investigation of Legal System and Problems Related to Multimodal Transport of Goods between Korea and China
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
随着“一带一路”倡议在各有关领域层层深入及“自由贸易协定”的签署, 韩中两国在经贸合作上也将不断迈入新的篇章. 实际上, 哪怕在新冠疫情 的阴云下, 两国间的进出口总量依旧能拨云见日, 取得增长. 根据中国海关总署2020年10月的数据显示, 同年前三个季度, 两国的进出口贸易额已 经达到了1.45万亿元人民币, 在全球经济大环境萎靡不振的前提下,同比 增长了1.1%. 而与经济发展相辅相成的, 是为了稳固成果并不断的扩大市场, 从而对 更高效便捷的物流体系的要求. 在传统的单式运输已经无力满足两国贸易 全部需求的当下, 作为所谓“综合运输体系”上重要的一环, 货物多式联运倚仗其整合高效的“door to door”模式,无疑可以成为货物运输领域的“强 心针”. 而为了大力发展货物多式联运, 众航运国家依据各式国际公约, 纷 纷地加大了对货物多式联运的立法力度. 韩中两国都有建设“海洋强国”的 宏伟目标, 但在多式联运的相关立法上却显得有些保守. 因两国具有不同的政治制度和文化背景, 也就导致了双方在立法上存在 部分差异, 而又在一定程度上缺乏对彼此法律制度的了解. 正因如此, 才 有了对两国的多式联运法律体系进行梳理的意义和必要. 其中, 韩国对多 式联运及其各运输区段的立法分布在《商法典》的各章节中, 而对多式联 运进行针对性规制的《2010商法改正案》却依旧停留在研究阶段, 未被韩 国国会通过;而中国对货物多式联运及其各运输区段的立法散见于《民法典》、《海商法》及各单式运输的法律法规之中,形成了一个较为松 散的多式联运法律体系. 货物多式联运的发展诉求强烈, 两国间关于国际货物多式联运纠纷的数 量预计也会不断增加. 然而在对相关法律法规进行考察后, 不难发现, 面 对可能日益复杂的新形势, 现有法律体系因部分缺失而不足以应对越来越多的挑战. 解决问题的前提条件, 首先是要发现问题. 通过“比较法研究”的 手段来寻找两国立法的异同, 结果显示出韩中两国在多式联运相关的规定 上, 既存在各自的问题, 也有需要共同克服的法律困境. 如果能切实有效的改善这一系列法律制度上的不足, 则可以对两国境内、特别是两国之间 的货物多式联运, 乃至整个综合运输体系的发展, 贡献不可忽视的力量. 此外, 考虑到韩中两国在制定域内法律法规时, 必然需要优先考虑到本 国国情和各自多式联运发展的实际需要, 进行有针对性的补足. 基于此, 在发展两国之间的国际货物多式联运时, 可以立足于“韩中自贸协定”所建立的互信互利、合作共赢的基础之上, 制定一部同样具有区域性质的“韩 中多式联运协定”, 有效协调两国在立法上的差异, 全面覆盖应该涉及的各 项制度, 以期为韩中货物多式联运的法制建设添砖加瓦.
Abstract
With the “Belt and Road” Initiative and the signing of the Free Trade Agreement, Korea and China will continue to enter a new phase of economic and trade cooperation. In fact, even under the impact of COVID-19, the total volume of imports and exports between the two countries has been able to grow despite the difficulties. According to data from China’s General Administration of Customs in October 2020, the import and export trade between the two countries had reached RMB 1.45 trillion in the first three quarters of the same year, an increase of 1.1% year-on-year against the backdrop of the global economic downturn. The economic development is complemented by the demand for a more efficient and convenient logistics system in order to secure the results and continuously expand the market. As an important part of the so-called “comprehensive system of transport”, multimodal transport of cargoes, which is an integrated and efficient “door to door” mode, can undoubtedly become a “strong force” in the field of cargo transportation, as traditional unimodal transport is no longer able to meet all the needs of trade between the two countries. In order to vigorously develop multimodal transportation of cargoes, many shipping countries have increased the legislation on multimodal transportation of cargoes in accordance with various international conventions. Both Korea and China have the ambitious goal of building a “maritime power”, but they are somewhat conservative in the legislation related to multimodal transportation. The different political systems and cultural backgrounds of the two countries have led to some differences in legislation. Both sides also lack a certain degree of understanding of each other’s legal systems. Because of this, it is meaningful and necessary to sort out the legal systems of multimodal transport in both countries. In particular, the Korean legislation on multimodal transport and its various transport sections are distributed in various chapters of the Commercial Code. The 2010 Commercial Law Reform Bill, which regulates multimodal transportation, is still at the study stage and has not been passed by the Korean National Assembly. China’s legislation on multimodal transportation of goods and its various transport sections are scattered in the Civil Code, the Maritime Code and the laws and regulations on unimodal transportation, forming a loose legal system of multimodal transportation. There is a strong demand for the development of multimodal transportation of cargoes. The number of disputes on international multimodal transportation of goods between two countries is also expected to increase. However, after examining the relevant laws and regulations, it is easy to see that the existing legal system is inadequate to meet the increasing challenges due to partial deficiencies in the face of a new situation that may become increasingly complex. A prerequisite for solving the problem is to identify it. By means of “comparative law studies” to find the similarities and differences between the two countries’ legislation, Korea and China have both their own problems and legal dilemmas that need to be overcome jointly in terms of multimodal transport-related regulations. If this series of legal system deficiencies can be effectively improved, it can make a non-negligible contribution to the development of multimodal transportation of goods within the two countries, especially between the two countries, and even the entire integrated transport system. In addition, taking into account that the two countries must give priority to their own national conditions and the actual needs of their respective multimodal transport development in the formulation of domestic laws and regulations, the two countries will make targeted complements. Therefore, in the development of international intermodal transportation of goods between the two countries, based on the basis of mutual trust and mutual benefit and win-win cooperation of the “Korea-China Free Trade Agreement”, a “Korea-China Multimodal Transportation Agreement” with the same regional nature can be formulated. The “agreement” will effectively harmonize the differences in legislation between the two countries and cover all the systems that should be involved in order to promote the legal construction of multimodal transportation of goods between Korea and China.
참고문헌 (15)
- 김인현, "2010년 법무부 복합운송법 제정안의 성립 경위와 중요 내용", 상사법연구, 30(1), pp.269~302 (2011), 한국상사법학회
- 박재홍, "복합운송법제의 개선에 관한 연구", 박사, 상사법, pp.2011
- "해상법개정시안 및 계속 검토사항", 한국해법학회지, 26(1) (2004)
- 박은영, "복합운송에 관한 상법의 문제점 및 개산방안 검토" (2016), 동아대학교 법학연구소
- 박종은, "중국의 ‘일대일로’활용에 따른 한⋅중 복합운송 규정의 통일 필요성에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 50통권 : 50, pp.287~309 (2016), 부설법학연구소
- 박종은, "한․중․러․북 국제복합운송에 대한 적용 법률의 통일에 관한 탐색적 연구", 법학연구, 55, pp.155~183 (2018), 부설법학연구소
- 송양호, "복합운송법 제정안에 관한 검토", 한국해법학회지, 34(1), pp.7~51 (2012), 한국해법학회[DOI]
- 송호신, "복합운송에 대한 2010년 상법개정안의 분석과 비판", 한양법학, (34), pp.63~96 (2011), 한양법학회
- 유경숙, "복합운송책임의 신체계에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학과, pp.2012
- 정준우, "복합운송에 관한 2011년 상법개정안의비판적 검토", 법학연구, 14(2), pp.171~210 (2011), 법학연구소
- 陈玉梅, "对我国多式联运中承运人立法完善的若干思考", 求索, (8) (2010)
- 丁莲芝, "国际货物多式联运经营人责任限制问题研究", 博士, pp.2014
- 郭萍, "货物多式联运法律制度比较研究" (2012), 大连海事大学出版社
- 郭萍, "论货物多式联运合同的法律适用", 中国海商法年刊, (1) (2009)
- 路玮孝, "推动东北亚地区融入一带一路合作的研究" (2019), 黑龙江省社会科学院
