中国法律职业伦理适用困境及其化解 - 以法官与律师 “不正当接触交往” 规定为切入点 -
The Dilemma of China Legal Professional Ethics Application and Its Resolution - Take the Provisions on “Unfair Contacts and Exchanges” between Judges and Lawyers as the Entry Point -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
法律职业伦理适用之“难”一直是法律职业伦理规范化、体系化的重要阻 碍. 以法官与律师的“不正当接触交往”这一规定为例,其作为法律职业伦 理的组成部分,其相关规定层级众多且效力较低,导致其在司法实践中 更是难以被适用. 并且,由于法官与律师的“不正当接触交往”规定的内涵 较为模糊,加之行业规定与法律规范衔接存在缝隙,进一步加剧了其适 用的难度. 但如果在适用中运用文义解释方法,就可以厘清“不正当接触 交往”的行为模式和行为内涵;结合内部证成与外部证成的论证方式,则 更加有利于促进法律职业伦理作为行业规定适用的正当性和可接受性.
Abstract
The “difficulty” in the application of legal professional ethics has always been an important obstacle to the standardization and systematization of legal professional ethics. Take the regulation of “unfair contact and communication” between judges and lawyers as an example,as an integral part of legal professional ethics, its relevant regulations have many levels and low effectiveness, making it even more difficult to apply in judicial practice. In addition, the connotation of the provisions on “unfair contact and communication” between judges and lawyers is rather vague, and there are gaps in the connection between Code of Conduct and legal norms, which further exacerbates the difficulty of its application. However, if the textual interpretation method is used in the application, the behavioral mode and behavioral connotation of “unfair contact and communication” can be clarified; the combination of internal justification and external justification is more conducive to promoting the justification and acceptability of application of the legal professional ethics as Code of Conduct.
참고문헌 (24)
- 亚历山大, "论法律与理性" (2015), 中国政法大学出版社
- 王进喜, "法律职业行为法" (2014), 中国人民大学出版社
- 欧文M, "逻辑学导论" (2014), 中国人民大学出版社
- 刘小吾, "走向职业共同体的中国法律人:徘徊在商人、牧师和官僚政客之间" (2010), 法律出版社
- 迈克尔, "法律解释:法哲学论文集" (2006), 法律出版社
- 伍铁平, "模糊语言学" (1999), 上海外语教育出版社
- 波斯纳, "法理学问题" (1994), 中国政法大学出版社
- 刘仁文, "用重药还是用良药?法官、检察官与律师交往的尺度", 南方周末 (2022)
- 苏新建, "法律职业伦理:历史、价值与挑战", 河南财经政法大学学报, (6) (2021)
- 王彬, "逻辑涵摄与后果考量:法律论证的二阶构造", 南开学报(哲学社会科学版), (2) (2020)
- 郑菲, "文义解释与目的解释之关系探析", 法律方法, (2) (2019)
- 全国律协维护律师执业权利中心, "2018年上半年律师协会维权工作数据统计与分析", 中国律师, (9) (2018)
- 张基奎, "法官与律师“不正当”交往的判断标准", 人民法院报 (2009)
- 周舜隆, "司法三段论在法律适用中的局限性——兼论法官裁判思维", 比较法研究, (6) (2007)
- 王鹏翔, "论涵摄的逻辑结构兼评Larenz的类型理论", 成大法学, (9) (2005)
- 张坚, "严格规范律师与法官的交往关系", 中国司法, (7) (2004)
- 刘愫贞, "法律语言与语词对象", 上海政法管理干部学院学报, (9) (1999)
- "山东省济南市天桥区人民法院刑事判决书", 鲁0105刑初79号, ~ (2021)
- "海南省第一中级人民法院刑事判决书", 琼96刑初34号, ~ (2020)
- "湖南省高级人民法院民事裁定书", 湘民申4167号, ~ (2019)
- "杭州博野贸易有限公司与李浩劳动争议再审民事裁定书", 京民再89号, ~ (2018)
- "深圳奥特迅电力设备股份有限公司劳动争议再审审查与审判监督民事裁定书", 粤民申9200号, ~ (2017)
- "中华人民共和?最高人民法院民事裁定书", 最高法民申3404号, ~ (2016)
- 1号, , ~
