본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

中国《公司法》修订中公司治理模式的立法选择难题与规则改进

The Difficulties of Legislative Choice of Corporate Governance Models in the Revision of China’s Company Law and the Improvement of the Rules

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

2018年,中国启动新一轮公司法修改,公司治理模式改革是其中的关 键性问题. 尽管,《公司法(修订草案第三次审议稿)》采用的任意性股 东会模式相较于《公司法(修订草案第一次审议稿)》采用的强制性股 东会模式,在股东会介入董事会经营决策的强度上得到了削弱. 但是,公 司修改过程中,立法者仍沿用“一刀切”的立法技术为所有公司类型采用统 一的公司治理模式,从而陷入选择封闭公司抑或公众公司作为标准模板 的立法选择难题. 《公司法(修订草案第三次审议稿)》选择了以封闭公 司为标准模板确立了任意性股东会中心模式. 但是,公众公司的本质是由 纵向科层治理结构和横向协同治理结构组成的实体,强制性董事会中心 模式是维护公众公司实体性的制度基础. 在权力初始分配层面,公司授予 董事会经营决策权,在权力再分配层面,董事会职权规则具有强制性. 股 东会不能以冲突决议或修改章程的方式介入董事会经营决策. 公司法应重 构股份公司类型,将股份公司区分为公众公司和封闭型股份公司,为公 众公司采用强制性董事会中心模式.

Abstract

In 2018, China launched a new round of company law revisions, in which the reform of corporate governance model is a key issue. Although the default shareholders primacy model adopted in the Third Review Draft of the Company Law (Revised Draft) has weakened the intensity of the shareholders’ meeting’s involvement in the board of directors’ business decision-making compared to the mandatory shareholders primacy model adopted in the First Review Draft of the Company Law (Revised Draft). However, during the revision process, the legislator still used the “one-size-fits-all” legislative technique to adopt a uniform corporate governance model for all types of companies, thus falling into the legislative choice of whether to choose a closed company or a public company as the normative template. The Third Review Draft of the Company Law (Revised Draft) chooses the closed company as the regulatory model and establishes the default shareholders primacy model. However, the essence of a public company is an entity composed of a vertical hierarchical governance structure and a horizontal synergistic governance structure,and the mandatory director primacy model is the systematic basis for the maintenance of the entity nature of the public company. At the level of the initial distribution of power, the company grants the board of directors the business decision-making power, and at the level of the redistribution of power, the rule of the board of directors’authority is mandatory. The shareholders’ meeting cannot intervene in the board’s business decisions by means of conflicting resolutions or amendments to the by-laws. The company law should reconstruct the type of joint-stock company, distinguish the joint-stock company into public company and closed joint-stock company, and adopt the mandatory director primacy model for the public company.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 杨仁寿, "法学方法论" (2013), 中国政法大学出版社
  2. 赵旭东, "公司法修订中的公司治理制度革新", 中国法律评论, (3) (2020)
  3. 钱玉林, "民法总则与公司法的适用关系论", 法学研究, (3) (2018)
  4. 罗培新, "股东会与董事会权力构造论:以合同为进路的分析", 政治与法律, (2) (2016)
  5. 钱玉林, "我国<公司法>体系的重构——一种解释论的观点", 政治与法律, (2) (2021)
  6. 谢鸿飞, "论民法典法人性质的定位——法律历史社会学与法教义学分析", 中外法学, (6) (2015)
  7. 蒋大兴, "公司董事会的职权再造", 现代法学, (4) (2020)
  8. 潘林, "论公司机关决策权力的配置", 中国法学, (1) (2022)
  9. 陈景善, "董事合规义务体系——以董事会监督机制为路径依赖", 中国法律评论, (3) (2022)
  10. 徐深澄, "董事合规监督义务的构建", 商业经济与管理, (5) (2023)
  11. 赵旭东, "公司组织机构职权规范的制度安排与立法设计", 政法论坛, (4) (2022)
  12. 许可, "股东会与董事会分权制度研究", 中国法学, (2) (2017)
  13. Melvin Aron Eisenberg, "The Structure of the Corporation" (2006), Beard Books
  14. Rafael La Porta, "Corporate Ownership Around the World", Journal of Finance, 54, pp.471~ (1999)
  15. Michael C. Jensen, "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure", Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), pp.305~ (1976)
  16. Stephen M. Bainbridge, "Director Primacy : The Means and Ends of Corporate Governance", Northwestern University Law Review, 97, pp.547~ (2002)
  17. Frank H. Easterbrook, "Corporate Contract", Columbia Law Review, 89, pp.1416~ (1989)
  18. William W. Bratton, Jr., "The “Nexus of Contracts” Corporation: A Critical Appraisal", Cornell Law Review, 74, pp.407~ (1988)
  19. Ronald. H. Coase, "The Nature of the Firm", Economica, 4, pp.386~ (1937)
  20. Armen A. Alchian, "Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization", The American Economic Review, 62, pp.777~ (1972)
  21. Margaret M. Blair, "Team Production Theory of Corporate Law", Virginia Law Review, 85, pp.247~ (1999)
  22. Raghuram G. Rajan, "Power in a Theory of the Firm", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, pp.387~ (1998)
  23. Melvin Aron Eisenberg, "The Structure of Corporation Law", Columbia Law Review, 89, pp.1461~1462 (1989)
  24. "CA, Inc. v. AFSCME Emples. Pension Plan, 953 A.2d 227", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)