평면 비정형 건물의 설계편심과 지진 손상도의 상관관계에 관한 연구
A Study on the Relationship between Earthquake Damage and the Design Eccentricity of Building with Planar Irregularity
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the Korean Building Code (KBC), the Design Eccentricity involves the torsional amplification factor (TAF), and the inherent and accidental eccentricities. When a structure of less than 6-stories and assigned to seismic design category C or D is designed using equivalent static analysis method, both KBC-2006 and KBC-2009 use the TAF but apply different calculation methods for the of design eccentricity. The design eccentricity in KBC-2006 is calculated by multiplying the sum of inherent eccentricity and accidental eccentricity at each level by a TAF but that in KBC-2009 is calculated by multiplying only the accidental eccentricity by a TAF. In this paper, the damage indices of a building with planar structural irregularity designed by different design eccentricities are compared and the relationship between the earthquake damage and design eccentricity of the building is evaluated. On the basis of this study, the increment of design eccentricity results in the decrement of final eccentricity and global damage index of structure. It is observed that design eccentricity in KBC-2006 reduces the vulnerability of torsional irregular building compared to design eccentricity in KBC-2009.
Abstract
In the Korean Building Code (KBC), the Design Eccentricity involves the torsional amplification factor (TAF), and the inherent and accidental eccentricities. When a structure of less than 6-stories and assigned to seismic design category C or D is designed using equivalent static analysis method, both KBC-2006 and KBC-2009 use the TAF but apply different calculation methods for the of design eccentricity. The design eccentricity in KBC-2006 is calculated by multiplying the sum of inherent eccentricity and accidental eccentricity at each level by a TAF but that in KBC-2009 is calculated by multiplying only the accidental eccentricity by a TAF. In this paper, the damage indices of a building with planar structural irregularity designed by different design eccentricities are compared and the relationship between the earthquake damage and design eccentricity of the building is evaluated. On the basis of this study, the increment of design eccentricity results in the decrement of final eccentricity and global damage index of structure. It is observed that design eccentricity in KBC-2006 reduces the vulnerability of torsional irregular building compared to design eccentricity in KBC-2009.
참고문헌 (22)
- Architectual Institute of Korea, "Korean building code", Architectual Institute of Korea, 121~ (2006)
- Architectual Institute of Korea, "Korean building code", Architectual Institute of Korea, 106~ (2009)
- "ASCE", SEI 7-10, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, 2010, pp.80~92
- Structural Engineers Association of California, "Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary", ~ (1999)
- International Conference of Building Officials, "Uniform Building Code", ~ (1991)
- International Conference of Building Officials, "Uniform Building Code", ~ (1994)
- International Conference of Building Officials, "Uniform Building Code", 2~15 (1997)
- NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, "Federal Emergency Management Agency", FEMA, 3~2, pp.Report FEMA 273 (1997)
- NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, "Federal Emergency Management Agency", FEMA, 66~, pp.Report FEMA 302 (1997)
- Structural Engineers Association of California, "Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary", 13~121 (1999)
- Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, "Federal Emergency Management Agency", FEMA, 3~3, pp.Report FEMA 356 (2000)
- NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, "Federal Emergency Management Agency", FEMA, 76~, pp.Report FEMA 368 (2000)
- "ASCE", SEI 7-02, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, 2002, pp.148~
- NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, "Federal Emergency Management Agency", FEMA, 90~, pp.Report FEMA 450 (2003)
- "ASCE", SEI 7-05, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, 2006, pp.130~214
- 정성훈, "지진 하중을 받는 평면 비정형 건물의 편심과 손상도의 상관관계에 대한 연구", 한국지진공학회논문집, 14(3), pp.49~57 (2010), 한국지진공학회
- Stathopoulos KG, "Accidental design eccentricity: Is it important for the inelastic respose of buildings to strong motion", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30(9), pp.782~797 (2010)
- Jeong SH, "Analytical modeling of inelastic seisimic response of RC structure", J. Struct. Eng, 132(9), pp.1482~1490 (2006)
- 이광호, "설계편심의 크기에 따른 비틀림 비정형 건물의 최종 정적편심 크기의 비교에 관한 연구", 한국지진공학회논문집, 16(5), pp.33~40 (2012), 한국지진공학회
- Elanshai AS, "ZEUS-NL Users Manual", University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2002
- Elnashai AS, "Performance of composite steel", concrete membersunder earthquake loading, part I: analytical model, 1993, pp.22(4), 314~345
- Elnashai AS, "Modeling of material nonlinearities in steel structures subjected to transient dynamic loading", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 22(6), pp.509~532 (1993)