설계편심의 크기에 따른 비틀림 비정형 건물의 최종 정적편심 크기의 비교에 관한 연구
A Study on the Static Eccentricities of Buildings Designed by Different Design Eccentricities
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
지진하중에 의해 발생하는 비정형 건물의 피해를 줄이기 위하여 내진설계기준에서는 비틀림 증폭계수를 도입하였다. 이계수는 내진설계기준에 따라 다르게 적용되었으며 같은 시기의 설계기준에서조차 다르게 적용되었다. 본 연구에서는 서로 다른 설계편심으로 설계된 건물의 최종 정적편심의 크기, 연약단부의 횡강성과 비틀림 강성비를 비교하였다. 비틀림 증폭계수가 증가할수록 연약단부의횡강성이 증가하여 건물의 최종 정적편심의 크기는 감소하였으나 이 계수가 최대값 3.0에 도달한 이후부터 건물의 최종 정적편심의 크기는 다시 증가하였다. 우발편심과 정적편심의 합에 비틀림 증폭계수를 곱하여 구한 설계편심으로 설계된 건물의 최종 정적편심의 크기는수직부재의 위치에 따라 0 또는 음수로 측정되었다.
Abstract
To reduce the vulnerability of torsional irregular buildings caused by seismic loads, the torsional amplification factor was introduced by the seismic code. This factor has been applied differently in a variety of seismic codes. In this study,the final static eccentricity, and the lateral and torsional stiffness ratios of buildings designed with different design eccentricities were compared. The increment of the torsional amplification factor resulted in a decrement of the final static eccentricity of the building. However, after reaching the maximum value of this factor, the final static eccentricity of the building increased again. The final static eccentricity of the building designed by multiplying the sum of the inherent and accidental eccentricity by the torsional amplification factor was zero or had a minus value, depending to the position of the vertical element.
참고문헌 (20)
- 대한건축학회, "건축구조설계기준", pp.106~ (2009), 대한건축학회
- ASCE, "SEI 7-10", Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, 2010, pp.80~92
- Stefano, M. D., "A comparison of the present SEAOC", UBC torsional provisions with the old ones, 1997, pp.19(8), 655~664
- 이명규, "모드 해석을 이용한 등가 지진하중에서의 설계 편심", 대한토목학회 논문집A, 22(6-A), pp.1259~1269 (2002), 대한토목학회
- 홍성걸, "평면비정형 벽식 구조물의 비탄성설계변위 산정", 대한건축학회논문집 구조계, 23(2), pp.51~58 (2007), 대한건축학회
- NEHRP recommended Seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures, "Federal Emergency Management Agency", ~, pp.Report FEMA P-750 (2009)
- International Conference of Building Officials, "Uniform Building Code" (1988)
- Structural Engineers Association of California, "Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary", ~ (1999)
- International Conference of Building Officials, "Uniform Building Code", USA (1991)
- International Conference of Building Officials, "Uniform Building Code" (1994)
- International Conference of Building Officials, "Uniform Building Code", pp.2~15 (1997)
- NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, "Federal Emergency Management Agency", ~, pp.Report FEMA 273 (1997)
- NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, "Federal Emergency Management Agency", ~, pp.Report FEMA 302 (1997)
- Structural Engineers Association of California, Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary, "Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary", 13; 112; 121, ~ (1999)
- Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, "Federal Emergency Management Agency", ~, pp.Report FEMA 356 (2000)
- NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, "Federal Emergency Management Agency", ~, pp.Report FEMA 368 (2000)
- ASCE, "SEI 7-02", Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, 2002[DOI]
- NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, "Federal Emergency Management Agency", ~, pp.Report FEMA 450 (2003)
- ASCE, "SEI 7-05", Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, 2006
- 대한건축학회, "건축구조설계기준 HANDBOOK", pp.121~ (2006), 대한건축학회