북방민족의 정체성과 계승성
Identity and Inheritance of the Northern Peoples
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of the study was to make correction of wrong cognition on the Northern nomad and to examine identity and inheritance of the Northern nomad from neutral point of view. China was no more than a part of regions of the empires of conquest dynasties such as Khitai, Altan, Yuan and Qing. Viewpoint of the Chinese history of conquest dynasties lost balance because of foundation in the territory of China. Even if Khitai and Altan included a part of central districts into the territory, they wanted to control grassland and Manchurian force having direct relation with their existence. As a matter of fact, the conquest dynasties accepted Chinese systems and culture, and the Chinese dynasties also accepted conquest dynasties' systems and culture. The conquest dynasties separated Chinese character culture areas from non-Chinese character culture areas to control their world in their own way. Classification into Yuan, Ming and Qing seemed to inherit the Chinese dynasty, and both dynasties actually confronted each other to the north and south to be enemy. More than two hundred years from fall of Yuan Empire to foundation of Qing Empire, Mongolia was not society divided into west and east but nomadic country of tribe coalition without government. 21 Khans and powerful followers of Mongolian Empire created internal conflict by attack against Ming Empire and gave spoils of war and rights of trading to gather meadow powers. The Mongolian Empire that had loose coalition was not divided society in the unit of tribe but government of Mongolian Empire. The purpose of the study was to make correction of wrong cognition on history from point of view of China and to examine identity and inheritance of the Northern nomad race.
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to make correction of wrong cognition on the Northern nomad and to examine identity and inheritance of the Northern nomad from neutral point of view. China was no more than a part of regions of the empires of conquest dynasties such as Khitai, Altan, Yuan and Qing. Viewpoint of the Chinese history of conquest dynasties lost balance because of foundation in the territory of China. Even if Khitai and Altan included a part of central districts into the territory, they wanted to control grassland and Manchurian force having direct relation with their existence. As a matter of fact, the conquest dynasties accepted Chinese systems and culture, and the Chinese dynasties also accepted conquest dynasties' systems and culture. The conquest dynasties separated Chinese character culture areas from non-Chinese character culture areas to control their world in their own way. Classification into Yuan, Ming and Qing seemed to inherit the Chinese dynasty, and both dynasties actually confronted each other to the north and south to be enemy. More than two hundred years from fall of Yuan Empire to foundation of Qing Empire, Mongolia was not society divided into west and east but nomadic country of tribe coalition without government. 21 Khans and powerful followers of Mongolian Empire created internal conflict by attack against Ming Empire and gave spoils of war and rights of trading to gather meadow powers. The Mongolian Empire that had loose coalition was not divided society in the unit of tribe but government of Mongolian Empire. The purpose of the study was to make correction of wrong cognition on history from point of view of China and to examine identity and inheritance of the Northern nomad race.
참고문헌 (41)
- М. Баярсайхан, "Алтан Товч, сонгомол эх бэлтгэж, хөрвүүлэг, № VIII" (2006), УБ
- 김장구, "역주 몽골 황금사" (2014), 동북아역사재단
- М. Баярсайхан, "Саган сэцэн, Эрдэнийн товч, сонгомол эх бэлтгэж, хөрвүүлэг, № VIII" (2006), УБ
- 小澤重男, "元朝秘史全釋" (1987), 風間書房
- 유원수, "몽골비사" (2004), 사계절
- 라시드 앗딘, "부족지" (2002), 사계절
- 張穆石州, "蒙古遊牧記" (1939), 開明堂出版部
- 栗林 均, "華夷譯語(甲種本)モンゴル語 全單語․語尾索引" (2003), 東北大學東北アヅア硏究所ヤンタ一
- 토마스 바필드, "위태로운 변경" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 임대희, "대원제국" (2013), 혜안
- 피터 C. 퍼듀, "중국의 서진-청의 유라시아 정복사" (2012), 길
- Б.Я. Владимирцов, "몽골사회제도사" (1990), 대한교과서주식회사
- 김호동, "講座 中國史II" (1995), 지식산업사
- 景愛, "征服王朝論的要害在於歪曲中國歷史上的民族關系" (1984), 文化部文物局古文獻
- 記江紅, "中國通史" (2003), 北京出版社
- 范文爛, "中國通史" (2004), 人民出版社
- 社榮坤, "西蒙古史硏究" (2008), 廣西師範大學出版社
- 杉山正明, "モンゴル帝國と長いその後" (2008), 講談社
- 護雅夫, "北アジア史" (1981), 山川出版社
- Karl Wittfogel, "The History of Chinese Society: Liao (907-1125)" (1949), American Philosophical Society
- Herbert Franke, "The Cambridge history of China. Vol. 6: Alien regimes and border states, 967–1368", pp.864~ (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Crossley, Pamela K., "The Manchus" (1997), Blackwell Publishers
- David M. Robinson, "Culture, Courtiers and Competition: the Ming Court (1368-1644)" (2008), Cambridge MA
- Standen, Naomi, "Unbounded Loyalty: Frontier Crossings in Liao China" (2007), University of Hawaii Press
- 김호동, "몽골제국과 ‘大元’", 역사학보, (192), pp.221~253 (2006), 역사학회
- 김호동, "몽골제국의 ‘울루스 체제’의 형성", 동양사학연구, (131), pp.333~386 (2015), 동양사학회[DOI]
- 박원길, "금나라의 북방방어선과 타타르부", 몽골학, (35), pp.1~46 (2013), 한국몽골학회
- 윤영인, "외국학계의 정복왕조 연구 시각과 최근 동향" (2010), 동북아역사재단
- 윤영인, "하-송의 5년전쟁(1039-44)과 11세기 동아시아 세력균형", 만주연구, (16), pp.7~28 (2013), 만주학회
- 윤은숙, "北元과 明의 대립― 遼東 문제를 중심으로―", 동양사학연구, (105), pp.81~112 (2008), 동양사학회
- 윤은숙, "옷치긴과 칭기스칸의 金國 정벌전", 중앙아시아연구, 11, pp.51~74 (2006), 중앙아시아학회
- 윤은숙, "14∼15세기 우량카이 3衛와 몽골․明 관계", 명청사연구, (43), pp.1~29 (2015), 명청사학회
- 이석현, "‘전연의 盟’의 성립과 宋人의 認識", 동북아역사논총, (26), pp.165~203 (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 조병학, "後金의 東蒙古 복속과정 연구 - 淸實錄을 중심으로 -", 몽골학, (21), pp.141~171 (2006), 한국몽골학회
- 테무르, "만주(滿洲)가 직면한 원북남명(元北南明) - 몽골적 요인이 청나라 초기 제도에 미친 영향 -", 한국학연구, (37), pp.411~466 (2015), 한국학연구소
- N. 哈斯巴根, "清初汗號與满蒙關系", 民族研究, (2) (2012)
- 王文光, "中國民族史硏究散論", 思想戰線, 4 (2000)
- 雪蓮, "遼代西北邊疆的征服與治理", 內蒙古社會科學, (1) (2015)
- 劉浦江, "遼朝國號考釋", 歷史硏究, (6) (2001)
- 張帆, "學術思想評論 1" (1997), 遼寧大學出版社
- 程尼娜, "遼朝黑龍江流域屬國, 屬部朝貢活動硏究", 求是學刊, (1) (2012)